LexX said:
Tobar said:
Do they really have blue backgrounds there? Here those are black.
They're black here in the UK. The black doesn't make it look as terrible as the blue
DominicCobb said:
Waiting for someone to post John Cater.
Ask and ye shall recieve...
Warbler said:
the quality of the cover art never matters that much for me. I care more about what is on the disc(s).
O RLY?
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
Warbler said:
I hate mice. They've invaded our home. We've killed 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 so far.
fixed.
fixed.
fixed.
fixed.
fixed.
fixed.
fixed.
fixed.
did you eat it?
darth_ender said:
Warbler said:
darth_ender said:-we may finally have a trilogy that did not disappoint the majority on most levels.
ehem . . .
ROTJ didn't disappoint me at all, but I think that most fans, especially those of the era, found it inferior to the first two films. I love it as is, but I acknowledge it has its shortcomings. TDKR on the other hand promises to surpass the previous two, at least if initial reviews are anything to be believed. I hope they're right.
Bingowings said:
My first time it looked like that but with just Star Wars.
This is how it looked when I saw the double and triple bills though.
Back then people still smoked on the left and right aisles so you would get these two pillars of smoke which caught the projector light and swayed and swarmed like an unnamable alien miasma (masked the smell of the hot dogs though).
Why?
Why Hot Dogs with a film?
It's insanity!
Choc Ices I can get my head around, even crusader nuts but Hot Dogs?
Hot Dogs I'm fine with, because it's a quiet food source. Popcorn, on the other hand, is the real offender for me. You're trying to watch a film and it's a very dramatic moment and the all of a sudden you hear 'scrunch scrunch' rustle rustle 'scrunch scrunch scrunch!'
When I saw Pirates: in an adventure with scientists they showed the one of the early 1940s film classification cards at the beginning. I instantly recoginised it due to it appearing before every film in my Ealing studios collection (plus I had watched Whiskey Galore for the billionth time before seeing Pirates, and that had the same card.)
It made me think about the type of logo 'gag' filmmakers have for the studio vanity plates when they make films set in a certain era. e.g. When a filmmaker uses an old version of a logo relative to the year it's set.
Concerning Star Wars, when they showed the Original Unaltered film print at the Senator theater the print had a BBFC card, but bear in mind that it has the title 'A New Hope' attached to it so it's probably from the 1981 retitled version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OEctWVF4J_w#t=175s
TV's Frink said:
Everything I say is serious business.
Lair.
Lara Croft: Tomb Raider (2001)
Bleeeeuuuugh, this is film is incredibly naff. The only good things that come out of this are Jolie's 'assets', Daniel Craig's career, and the fact that it stars Arnold J Rimmer.
1 out of five balls
Rope (1948)
Fantastic, truly one of Hitchcock's best.
Four out of Five balls
TV's Frink said:
Wut
I miss read the title as 'What is your impression of crop formations?' I would've said 'Sorry I don't do impressions' in an attempt to be humorous. I realised my mistake though and changed it to something nonsensical and odd.
Fleeeeaiiiaggg
Pretty much as the title suggests. My money's on OOT Han, he shoots first.
;)
DuracellEnergizer said:
Wrong Ray gun!!!
Karma-karma-karma-karma-karma-chameleon-layka said:
What is your interpretation of crop formations?
Sort of like this....
squeeeaaag loooggggg hamm giaaaaant
with flappier hands... obviously
doubleofive said:
It's actually in the film, he walks up to the trooper immediately after capturing him and starts taking off his uniform.
Bow chicka waow waow!
Goddamn. I'm fed up with these stupid Ice Age movies. I really hate the advertisments for them. Soon they'll be releasing 'Ice Age 54: Renaissance Rumble Tumble' or something stupid like that.
It's raining so hard here in Englandshire, that it made a huge hole in our Gazebo. It's quite surprising, considering all the other crap the thing has put up with. It really is bucketing down.
Gregatron said:
....
Music:
TREK: Many TOS episodes have fantastic, powerful, and highly memorable scores created by great composers ("The Cage", "The Naked Time", "Amok Time", "The Doomsday Machine", etc.).
WARS: Williams' score reignited the popularity of orchestral scores in film, and the original movie's score has often been considered the best movie score of all time.
Winner: WARS
WHAT!!1111!!!2!!!!1!!!!!ONE!!!?!!!!!
D:<
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
;)
What I don't get is when people say you aren't allowed to like both. It's just silly. I love both Star Wars and Star Trek. It's like when they say that you can either like Adam West's Batman or Michael Keaton's/Christian Bale's Batman, I like both iterations of the character
Oh dear...
Didn't Mr Giger like it??
Bump!
Robocop: Rebooted
A sequel to the original first two films (not the third, screw that film, bleeeeugh) Robocop, after being frozen in ice, or a fridge or whatever wakes up 70 years in the future. In New Detroit, dozens of brand new Robocops run the city. Faster, Darker, gritter, shinier, sexier and, apparently, cooler than the original. The story would sort of be a physical representation of the argument for Original films vs Reboots, with the Original Robocop winning in the end, 'cos he's awesome. It would show both sides of the argument and try to be fair. The new Robocops represent the side of reboots, whilst the Original Robocop represents... err...the originals... The vast amount of New Robocops could represent the over-saturation of Reboots now. There could also be a point where they try and 'remake' Robocop.
Also, on a completely different note... there should be another Don Bluth film out.
Bump!
If glass breaks, unless you're John McClane, you won't get any cuts on you.
Bingowings said:
^I saw The Spy Who Loved Me there, Stirling I mean, at Allan Park (they even put my name over the door).
That's the place! ...I think.
Who are you calling a weak Atheist?!
I'll have you know, I managed to climb onto the roof of a very tall garage the other day using only my upper arm strength, thank you very much!!
;)
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
I had very low expectations for this film, based on the title, and I was actually pleasantly surprised. It's not a perfect movie by any means, but it is a fun ride. It has a lot of goofy moments and it does feel overly long, and the 3D isn't all that great.
I did like that the film took itself seriously instead of a goofy tongue-in cheek lame-o movie. It does get rather schlocky in parts, but overall it's rather solid.
4 out of 10 silver balls
Bester said:
thejediknighthusezni said:
Maul is shown racing clear of the scene on his speeder bike or alternate transport?
Whilst listening to "I'm Walking on Sunshine" by Katrina and the
Waves.
:D
