logo Sign In

generalfrevious

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
23-May-2006
Last activity
29-Aug-2017
Posts
2,022

Post History

Post
#741692
Topic
Hobbit - The Battle of Five Armies
Time

TV's Frink said:

generalfrevious said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

This just proves he was a talentless filmmaker from the start

Jackson has not made a good film since Return of the King.

 

 At least it's apparent that Kiwi Jack actually doesn't like any of Tolkeins work. I hope Christopher Tolkein stays alive long enough to stop him from making the Silmarillion. That could end up as five really awful four hour movies with King Kong thrown just for spite.

 http://i.imgur.com/2KODfWh.gif

 Ironic because jackson missed the point of Tolkein altogether.

And besides, sometimes a hack can accidentally make a good film (I'm looking at you Shyamalan)

Post
#741613
Topic
Hobbit - The Battle of Five Armies
Time

DrCrowTStarwars said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

This just proves he was a talentless filmmaker from the start

Jackson has not made a good film since Return of the King.

 

 Yep and I liked these movies.

So what if he didn't transcribe the book and give the Dwarves nothing to do but being saved at the last minute by Gandalf?  He stuck to the books for three movies and did three movies of his own thing, they are both good for different reasons so I am happy.

Also just because he didn't stick to the books or made some bad movies doesn't mean he has never had any talent as a film maker. At least he didn't just stick people on a couch and use shot reverse shot in every scene that wasn't an action scene. Oh and even if you don't like the 48fps 3D at least he had the guts to try something new to try and fix people's biggest complaint about 3D movies, you have to give him that.

Oh and you can't make a good movie if you have no talent, it doesn't happen. So Jackson's films may not be your cup of tea but I have seen real bad movies and let me tell you the Hobbit films and everything made by Jackson are nowhere near being bad films.  Jacks knows how to use a camera so you can see what is going on, he knows how to light a scene, he knows how to put a film together so viewers can follow the plot, and he knows how to direct actors. All of those things take talent and I have seen tons of movies from directors who can't get even one of those things right.

So no these are far from being bad movies, let alone the products of someone who doesn't have any talent.

 Yeah, but he still pissed on Tolkeins grave. I don't care if he was the next Bergman or Kurosawa; he was disrespectful to his work.

Post
#741606
Topic
Hobbit - The Battle of Five Armies
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

This just proves he was a talentless filmmaker from the start

Jackson has not made a good film since Return of the King.

 

 At least it's apparent that Kiwi Jack actually doesn't like any of Tolkeins work. I hope Christopher Tolkein stays alive long enough to stop him from making the Silmarillion. That could end up as five really awful four hour movies with King Kong thrown just for spite.

Post
#741583
Topic
Hobbit - The Battle of Five Armies
Time

Peter Jackson should of just exhumed Tolkein's remains and used his skull as a coffee mug; that would have been more respectful than these Hobbitt films. This just proves he was a talentless filmmaker from the start and that his encounter with Middle Earth was the worst thing to happen to JRR Tollein since the Great War. Why is it that Tolkein (and Batman) fans have to suffer so much when it comes to film adaptation? This ruined the LOTR trilogy for me forever, since to properly dismiss the Hobbitt you have to reject the originals as well.

Post
#736701
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

Possessed said:

generalfrevious said:

Possessed said:

Well I'd hate to be that guy to push drugs or drinking on somebody.

 Thank you very much: now I'll go overdose on some heroin.

 Why jump straight to heroin?  I was thinking like some pot.  That'd help you be more at peace with the world, and without overdosing  or dying.  I'm not even being that sarcastic, you really seem like you could use a good joint.  It wouldn't hurt you and it would help with your general despair.

 It's illegal though, even with a prescription. Not to mention if marijuana will even survive climate change.

Post
#736683
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

I don't mean to cut you off, but the truth is that what you see happening in the future doesn't jive with reality. Pessimism is not intrinsically wrong, but you go overboard. You need to start looking on the positive side, and realizing that the world is no worse than it ever was, and is in many ways better. Overall, people have a better quality of life than they used to. There are things that have gotten worse, but they are cancelled out, if not outweighed, by the things that have gotten better. Make a conscious effort to be positive, possibly seek therapy, but do not allow yourself to remain trapped in your dystopian view of the present and future.

 Didn't I read this conversation before? (NOT TROLLING)

Post
#736679
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

When I meant a 300 year period, I meant from 1850 to 2150. It has never been this abrupt and catastrophic before, hardly a "natural cycle" the pro-carbon activists want you to believe. Maybe it will be a 2C rise in the next century, but it probably be much higher than scientists are currently predicting thanks to a runaway greenhouse effect that will be triggered in the next few decades. There is a lot of carbon in permafrost and the oceans: warming the Earth will release it. Remember, it took 100 million years for all that coal and oil to be made in the first place. Burning all of it within the space of a hundred years is fatal. Evolution can't work fast enough compensate this geologically instantaneous event, hence niches will be emptied, and the whole tree of life crumbles like a house of cards.

Post
#736673
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

RicOlie_2 said:

generalfrevious said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

It totally sucks that I am living in the last decades of humanity, and that all life on Earth will probably be wiped out.

The largest extinction event in history -- the Permian-Triassic extinction event -- wiped out 96% of all marine species and 70% of all terrestrial vertebra species. Yet look at the Earth now -- chockful of life in all it's various forms.

Somehow, I don't think something as relatively minor as global warming is going to be the straw which breaks the Earth's back.

 I disagree. Global Warming WILL destroy 100% of all living organisms on Earth within the next century. We have never seen this before; and science will probably confirm my worst fears a few years from now. They could predict a 10-12 C rise in temperature by 2100 instead of 4-6 C. We could see South America, Africa, and half of Asia rendered uninhabitable much sooner than we expect; maybe by 2030 or 2040. The news is getting progressively worse every year.

 Scientists were predicting last winter that the icecap over the North Pole would be gone in 2015 (no joke). They seem to suck at predicting things.

Regardless, how would a 10-13 degree rise in temperature wipe out all living things? The temperature of the world has dropped and risen to far greater extremes in the past, so why would it wipe everything out this time? I can't imagine that everything would be wiped out if it was 35 to 40 degrees C in the summer and -20 to -10 degrees in the winter in Alberta (which is what it would be like with a 10 degree change). I'm pretty sure most things could survive within that temperature range, or at least move north (or be moved north, in the case of plants). Also, just because the good ol' U.S. of A. is warming up does not mean that the whole world is. Antarctica, for instance, is as cold as ever, if not colder.

Yeah, but never in our geologic history has it risen so fast in so short a time: 10 degrees C in less than 300 years, all cause by fossil fuels that took tens of millions of years to accumulate. Life on Earth may exist by 2150, but it will be nothing more than Archea species that will survive. It will end up like Mars at best. No plant life will likely to exist by the end of the century, and without plants there are no other life forms that can live on land; at sea the acidification of the ocean will kill of plankton, causing the same effect for marine life and reducing atmospheric oxygen to roughly 10% or less. It will be nothing but endless deserts on both land and sea a hundred years from now.

Post
#736661
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

It totally sucks that I am living in the last decades of humanity, and that all life on Earth will probably be wiped out.

The largest extinction event in history -- the Permian-Triassic extinction event -- wiped out 96% of all marine species and 70% of all terrestrial vertebra species. Yet look at the Earth now -- chockful of life in all it's various forms.

Somehow, I don't think something as relatively minor as global warming is going to be the straw which breaks the Earth's back.

 I disagree. Global Warming WILL destroy 100% of all living organisms on Earth within the next century. We have never seen this before; and science will probably confirm my worst fears a few years from now. They could predict a 10-12 C rise in temperature by 2100 instead of 4-6 C. We could see South America, Africa, and half of Asia rendered uninhabitable much sooner than we expect; maybe by 2030 or 2040. The news is getting progressively worse every year.

Post
#736552
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

Why is no one responding to my post!?!? Doesn't anyone know climate change is going to kill all humanity by 2100, and that we'll have two essentially back to back mass extinctions (65mya)? That anyone who voted republican this year is be default a mass murderer who deserves to be shot? That Bush v Gore was the death certificate of humanity because the right wing fucks didn't want a democrat in the White House? That the United States of 2014 is brick for brick an  exact replica of Nazi occupied Europe ca.1944? Why can't I go off the rails if the world is currently in the worst possible hell conceived by any intelligent being?!?!

Post
#736544
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

On another subject, the republican controlled congress is going to destroy large portions of civilization thans to their energy hungry policies, leading to the worst case scenario of climate change (6-10 degrees celsius) as already set in stone in the history books. If they are going to remorselessly manslaughter billions of people for the energy lobby's greed, then they deserve the worst death possible. They are going to be worse than the nazis and communists combined; they should be all assassinated.

since none of you believe in climate change anyways, you're all going to say this belongs in the politics thread.