Trident said:
I guess that's true, but it just seems like such a harsh picture: kill yourself because you don't think you can change and can't stand making everyone else suffer or else make everyone suffer, but then know that it will just make them hate you later.
Maybe I'm just naive, but it seems like if I was a compulsive gambler I would just talk to my family about it--but maybe that's because I think of my own addictions as so much worse that gambling seems easier to talk about. Or maybe I just don't understand the thought process. But I mean if you've reached the point where you know what's going on and what's going to happen haven't you gotten to a place where you might be able to change?
Then again I don't think I can change and I've reached that same point so maybe you're right.
I understand your point but since you don't have the addiction you are boarding the subject with a non-addict mind, the underlying problems of the addictions is what make people with better and safer options to solve an issue to sometimes just waste their entire life on the addiction or in worst case scenarios, off themselves.
A better picture of this is the hoarding cases, people without hoarding issues will never let their house to become a junkyard because it's very easy for them to decide that if they have enough stuff to interfere with their everyday life they will just get rid of it, specially if it is trash. Hoarders can't literally see the difference between garbage and useless stuff and things they really need because the psychological attachment, not been able to differentiate between trash and not trash must be something rough.
The addictions are a copping method for the underlying psychological issues, a symptom rather than the disease and that is what make addictions so hard to fight.