- Post
- #1166124
- Topic
- If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1166124/action/topic#1166124
- Time
ANYONE WHO DOESN’T POST “AGREED” DOESN’T AGREE!
i care
lukified that for you
ANYONE WHO DOESN’T POST “AGREED” DOESN’T AGREE!
i care
lukified that for you
ANYONE WHO DOESN’T POST “AGREED” DOESN’T AGREE!
i know
Not to mention the amount of time it would take to move that amount of matter (from the star to SKB), given that our own sun is about 333,000 as massive as Earth is. I’m not saying SKB is as big as Earth, but that a star has such an incomprehensibly large about of mass that it would take forever to move it all 8 light-minutes away even at relativistic speeds.
that’s what ludicrous speed is for
I don’t mess with River.
wise
If we’re still picking apart the physics of Star Wars, why has no one pointed out just how long it would take for matter from a star to reach a habitable planet (ie. Starkiller Base) that’s as far from it as we are from the Sun (we are 8.3 light minutes away)? Matter is not going to traverse the distance at the speed of light, and the appearance of the stream suggests it does not enter hyperspace.
no one in star wars learned physics, so they aren’t constrained by it.
“we are only limited by our minds”
Stupid Wash.
so look out
sighing is perfectly fine.
being annoying about sighing or not sighing is, well, annoying.
👍 great! Hang in there.
I love this.
It’s quite up to date too. Saves me from doing a 1.87 second Google search.
It’s funny how antsy fans are getting for a trailer for a movie they supposedly have no interest in.
I think it is another manifestation of the “collector” mentality that we all have now that digital media exists. It began with Napster.
ALLOL
70,000 / 1,000,000,000 = lurker
Excuse me, it’s 72,620 / 977,224. Get your facts right, Frink.
Frink is prolific, but is he 7% of OT.com ?
Numbers don’t lie.
No they don’t. but people mentioning numbers almost always are lying.
But I’m not lurking.
70,000 / 1,000,000,000 = lurker
Excuse me, it’s 72,620 / 977,224. Get your facts right, Frink.
Frink is prolific, but is he 7% of OT.com ?
Numbers don’t lie.
No they don’t. but people mentioning numbers almost always are lying.
^ Great job reading the whole thread.
we should give out trophies
70,000 / 1,000,000,000 = lurker
Excuse me, it’s 72,620 / 977,224. Get your facts right, Frink.
Frink is prolific, but is he 7% of OT.com ?
Yes he is, but that’s not what he was talking about.
OH.
In that case then i am a lurker too.
70,000 / 1,000,000,000 = lurker
Excuse me, it’s 72,620 / 977,224. Get your facts right, Frink.
Frink is prolific, but is he 7% of OT.com ?
I’m no brain scientist, but I don’t think we can use that kind of algorithm to define “rarely”.
you are only “mostly lurker”
That describes me as well.
HAH, in what depp universe is that true?
you are only “mostly lurker”
not sure that was necessary
EXERCISE, EXERCISE, EXERCISE
Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you’ve got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude. THIS IS NOT A DRILL.
EXERCISE, EXERCISE, EXERCISE