- Post
- #232654
- Topic
- Koyaanisqatsi - IRE Fullscreen Version (MORE IMAGE!) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/232654/action/topic#232654
- Time
cashflagg
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 10-May-2006
- Last activity
- 23-Jan-2008
- Posts
- 60
Post History
- Post
- #231526
- Topic
- Koyaanisqatsi - IRE Fullscreen Version (MORE IMAGE!) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/231526/action/topic#231526
- Time
- Post
- #230862
- Topic
- FAN EDIT REQUEST THREAD - Post your dream Fan Edits Here!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230862/action/topic#230862
- Time
Originally posted by: bigrob
i'lll be bidding for the laserdisc on eBay then! never knew about this!
Originally posted by: cashflagg
A simple one, really: ANIMAL HOUSE - anamorphic picture but with the original audio track from the non-anamorphic version. The re-release doesn't use the proper 60's tunes, instead substituting cheesy generic 80's ones. I can't bring myself to watch the DVD.
A simple one, really: ANIMAL HOUSE - anamorphic picture but with the original audio track from the non-anamorphic version. The re-release doesn't use the proper 60's tunes, instead substituting cheesy generic 80's ones. I can't bring myself to watch the DVD.
i'lll be bidding for the laserdisc on eBay then! never knew about this!
The earlier non-anamorphic release has the original audio track but the anamorphic re-release does not so there'd be no need for the laserdisc.
- Post
- #230385
- Topic
- FAN EDIT REQUEST THREAD - Post your dream Fan Edits Here!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230385/action/topic#230385
- Time
- Post
- #229646
- Topic
- Koyaanisqatsi - IRE Fullscreen Version (MORE IMAGE!) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/229646/action/topic#229646
- Time
Originally posted by: joebshmoe
where is this seeded? i can't find it anywhere...
where is this seeded? i can't find it anywhere...
Try torrentspy.
And thanks, baxter. She's movin' again!
- Post
- #229161
- Topic
- Koyaanisqatsi - IRE Fullscreen Version (MORE IMAGE!) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/229161/action/topic#229161
- Time
EDIT: She is downloading. Just very, very slowly. About 95 KB in the past hour. Rock'n'roll!
- Post
- #228834
- Topic
- Koyaanisqatsi - IRE Fullscreen Version (MORE IMAGE!) (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/228834/action/topic#228834
- Time
- Post
- #227024
- Topic
- Request: 'Dawn of the Dead - Ultimate Cut'
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227024/action/topic#227024
- Time
- Post
- #212879
- Topic
- ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/212879/action/topic#212879
- Time
Originally posted by: Gorram
Ahhh, now this is the problem, some people want fixes (sbres matte lines etc.) other people consider those types of fixes unacceptable and leading down the path to the SEs anyway.
Ahhh, now this is the problem, some people want fixes (sbres matte lines etc.) other people consider those types of fixes unacceptable and leading down the path to the SEs anyway.
Absolutely. Just give us the original versions how they first played in the cinemas, warts and all. If you have problems with the special effects technology of the time then that's your problem. Get the SE's. Me? I love matte lines and changing saber colours. Give 'em to me!
Just say NO to fixes.
- Post
- #208140
- Topic
- ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208140/action/topic#208140
- Time
Originally posted by: Davis
Then Grinder showed me a clip of his LD cap of the 1982? fullscreen LD of A New Hope. That clip was JUST as I remembered Star Wars.
See that's my thing. Also, if they release it in fullscreen, wouldn't that mean that the part of the picture that you ARE seeing be in the highest-res the OOT has EVER been released in? Maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Yeah, and? Theoretically they could scan in the image zoomed into - not just 4:3 - but beyond... so that all we get are close ups of lips and ears and glasses of blue milk. They'd be in the highest-res ever released on video but without context they're worthless. That said, you're quite right in your assumption. The difference between an anamorphic 2.35:1 transfer and a 4:3 fullscreen one ain't that great enough to warrant a fullscreen release, I believe. I suggest anyone wanting one for mere nostalgia purposes simply use the zoom button on their DVD player and let the DVD makers utilize their time and energy on more important pursuits...
My other two questions were....
1. If this is REALLY pressed from the original prints from 77-83, then we should be seeing the original subtitles BURNED IN, in their original font, right? That means we get Return on the Jedi with no misspelled subtitles, and no player-generated stuff that looks like garbage.
Then Grinder showed me a clip of his LD cap of the 1982? fullscreen LD of A New Hope. That clip was JUST as I remembered Star Wars.
See that's my thing. Also, if they release it in fullscreen, wouldn't that mean that the part of the picture that you ARE seeing be in the highest-res the OOT has EVER been released in? Maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Yeah, and? Theoretically they could scan in the image zoomed into - not just 4:3 - but beyond... so that all we get are close ups of lips and ears and glasses of blue milk. They'd be in the highest-res ever released on video but without context they're worthless. That said, you're quite right in your assumption. The difference between an anamorphic 2.35:1 transfer and a 4:3 fullscreen one ain't that great enough to warrant a fullscreen release, I believe. I suggest anyone wanting one for mere nostalgia purposes simply use the zoom button on their DVD player and let the DVD makers utilize their time and energy on more important pursuits...
My other two questions were....
1. If this is REALLY pressed from the original prints from 77-83, then we should be seeing the original subtitles BURNED IN, in their original font, right? That means we get Return on the Jedi with no misspelled subtitles, and no player-generated stuff that looks like garbage.
Not neccessarily. Those subs would've been the last thing put on since different territories would have different language requirements. Its easy enough to subtitle a scrawl but you don't wanna subtitle subtitles. My bet is that they'll be player-generated to accommodate the various language requirements of the format. Don't worry - I'm sure someone here will come up with a burnt-in version down the line!