I know that Terrence Young approved of the Criterion transfers-not sure about Guy Hamilton. The color does look amazing on those. (If only they had done Thunderball!)
The framing on the first three were always at the American standard of 1.85:1. In Europe they would be played in their original 1.66:1. So while the cropping is regrettable it isn't the absolute worst in the world. I had no idea that some of the LDs were actually in 1.66:1. This is good!
The Lowry produced UEs came from the original negatives. They went through a whole big hoopla about doing that, but now the opticals stand out like a sore thumb and the films are too cleaned up. Some colors (especially in Goldfinger) look "fresher" to my eyes but they don't seem to be what was originally shot. Comparing the UE to your original Criterion conversion makes this evident. Lowry (and most every modern studio) doesn't give a damn about original color timing. They go back to negatives and do whatever they feel like.
Thanks for comparing these, and those photos are a great help. I will now have to start collecting these to satisfy my inner Bond completist.
Screencaps would be greatly appreciated.
I noticed that the SE of OHMSS had some dialogue missing and that was supposedly one of the flaws on the first pressings of the SE discs. (And it definitely has print damage on the DVD.) If that 89 LD looks like the best to you then I'm definitely looking forward to it. Watching that old disc was an inspiration. It was like watching the film back in my childhood-because that pure technicolor was intact.
That last bit sounds like the ultimate early Connery preservation.