- Post
- #238682
- Topic
- Good comparison website
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238682/action/topic#238682
- Time

canofhumdingers
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 7-May-2005
- Last activity
- 7-Sep-2024
- Posts
- 1,285
Post History
- Post
- #235151
- Topic
- Real life Prequel Yoda....
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/235151/action/topic#235151
- Time
- Post
- #233428
- Topic
- Star Wars duels: lightsabers & the force!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/233428/action/topic#233428
- Time
canofhumdingers wrote
Gaffertape wrote (in reference to the above Yode comment):
Amen. And the same goes for Palpatine, but I don't think it's quite an "enlightened" state so much as a too important to bother with fighting. Am I the only person who finds it weird that Palpatine didn't have guards stationed when Mace and the others showed up. He certainly had them in ROTJ, not to mention later in ROTS when Yoda shows up, as useless as they were.
EDIT: But I don't mind the telekenesis thing as long as it's someone really powerful using it. If every Jedi, including Luke and Ben, started whipping out telekenesis of large objects during fights all the time, that would be different. But, you know, minor things, like drawing a small, unfixed object like a lightsaber back to them is okay by me.
The Duel of the Fates ( which to this day I think is the greatest lightsaber fight on film. No CGI bull shit doubles or artsy glow stick dancing. ESB's the most dramatic, but for pure spectacle this is the king.)
Have to disagree with you here. i watched the TPM duel the other day for the first time in forever & i couldn't stand it. I've taken Olympic style fencing lessons for several years and recently started taking Kendo (japanese "samurai style" fencing) and Iaido (the art of drawing the sword and killing the antagonist, from an unassuming position - i.e. sitting on the floor eating a bowl of rice & someone attacks you). The TPM fight just made me cringe! Ewan McGreggor jumps off the ground EVERY time he blocks* a blow!!! You would NEVER do that! you'd get killed in a heartbeat! In fact, in kendo you never even allow your feet to cross (much less, leave the ground)! You keep you right foot forward & your left foot back in a very agressive stance. you move in an awkward(at first) way similar to how a child would run with a "stick pony" when playing cowboy. & you lift your feet just enough to be able to move them, effectively "gliding" across the ground. This is so that, when you run into your opponent, if you don't succeed at killing them, they can't knock you over when you run into each other. Having one foot forward & one back is a very stable/powerful position. if your feet are close together, or worse yet, in the air!!, you're a dead man. This doesn't even bring up the point of the ridiculous twirling baton lightsabers of the prequels! The OOT fights were at least reasonably believable as they were based on ACTUAL swordfighting techniques (& honetly, the ANH duel is probably most realistic). I'm a huge fan of swordfighting and can go a long way in forgiving the over-the-top fights from hollywood when they at least try to mimic something that you might actually do, but the prequels are just laughable. They remind me too much of the sword twirling you see at karate tournaments (not to knock karate, it has lots of cool aspects, but the majority of people you see using swords in a karate demo or tournament have no idea how to actually fight with one) Sorry for the rant, i've been chewing on that for a few days now...
*in my experience, you very rarely "block" in a swordfight. you either dodge altogether, which leaves your oppenent open for the brief moment they've extended to strike you, which gives you the chance to kill them. Or, you parry, which is not to block, but deflect the attck in such a way as to make an opening from which you can immediately attack. This attack is called the riposte (pronounced ruh-post or ree-post depending on who you talk to). Of course, this is mostly from my olympic style fencing experience, of which i practiced foil and epee, but really focused on sabre. I've only been taking kendo for the past 4 months or so & we're still working mainly on footwork and swinging the sword correctly. It's a very slow learning curve, like any sword art, and we probably won't begin thinking about the defense side of things for months to come.
canofhumdingers wrote:
Interesting. & i found that to be a great show of the total command of the force Vader had &, the telekinesis aspect seemed like a natural progression of the force to me. PLus it makes the duel that much more intense. After Vader has totally owned luke in the duel, he really pours on the heat, revealing that he doesn't even need the saber to defeat luke. I think that draws a neat parallel to the concept that, once someone has truely mastered the sword arts, they have mastered themselves & therefore, no longer need the sword. Of course, it's not quite in the same vein as the japanese concept seeing as Vader is evil & that concept is really referring to enlightenment in a good way.
As for the telekenisis negating the need for lightsabers, i don't think that's necessarily true. Take, as an example, the jedi knight video games. you can do some pretty amazing force-feats, but you can't do them all at once, or forever. you have mana, which is essentially "force stamina" the more intense the force action, the more of this "stamina meter" you use & the longer you have to wait for it to recharge before using it again. That sort of how i always envisoned using the force, even before those games came out. You can't do everything all the time. the force is a source of energy, & just like our physical body, you can only do so much for so long with it before you need to rest & recuperate. &, just like our physical body, the more you train in the force & the more you "work out" (for lack of a better phrase) with it, the stronger you become & the more you can do before giving out.
edit: this is also why i feel yoda should never be seen with a lightsaber!! He has reached such a high level of "oneness" with the force that he essentially IS the ultimate samurai. He has transcended the need for physical weapons.
Have to disagree with you here. i watched the TPM duel the other day for the first time in forever & i couldn't stand it. I've taken Olympic style fencing lessons for several years and recently started taking Kendo (japanese "samurai style" fencing) and Iaido (the art of drawing the sword and killing the antagonist, from an unassuming position - i.e. sitting on the floor eating a bowl of rice & someone attacks you). The TPM fight just made me cringe! Ewan McGreggor jumps off the ground EVERY time he blocks* a blow!!! You would NEVER do that! you'd get killed in a heartbeat! In fact, in kendo you never even allow your feet to cross (much less, leave the ground)! You keep you right foot forward & your left foot back in a very agressive stance. you move in an awkward(at first) way similar to how a child would run with a "stick pony" when playing cowboy. & you lift your feet just enough to be able to move them, effectively "gliding" across the ground. This is so that, when you run into your opponent, if you don't succeed at killing them, they can't knock you over when you run into each other. Having one foot forward & one back is a very stable/powerful position. if your feet are close together, or worse yet, in the air!!, you're a dead man. This doesn't even bring up the point of the ridiculous twirling baton lightsabers of the prequels! The OOT fights were at least reasonably believable as they were based on ACTUAL swordfighting techniques (& honetly, the ANH duel is probably most realistic). I'm a huge fan of swordfighting and can go a long way in forgiving the over-the-top fights from hollywood when they at least try to mimic something that you might actually do, but the prequels are just laughable. They remind me too much of the sword twirling you see at karate tournaments (not to knock karate, it has lots of cool aspects, but the majority of people you see using swords in a karate demo or tournament have no idea how to actually fight with one) Sorry for the rant, i've been chewing on that for a few days now...
*in my experience, you very rarely "block" in a swordfight. you either dodge altogether, which leaves your oppenent open for the brief moment they've extended to strike you, which gives you the chance to kill them. Or, you parry, which is not to block, but deflect the attck in such a way as to make an opening from which you can immediately attack. This attack is called the riposte (pronounced ruh-post or ree-post depending on who you talk to). Of course, this is mostly from my olympic style fencing experience, of which i practiced foil and epee, but really focused on sabre. I've only been taking kendo for the past 4 months or so & we're still working mainly on footwork and swinging the sword correctly. It's a very slow learning curve, like any sword art, and we probably won't begin thinking about the defense side of things for months to come.
Shimraa wrote:
yeah but they look cool, and thats the best thing about them
Obi Jeewhyen wrote:
I will say that I agree almost wholeheartedly with canofhumdingers' comments re the ESB lightsaber duel.
The thing that wrecks it for me, and wrecks the Force for me in general, is all that wonderful control Vader exhibits over the entire duel is mocked and made pointless when he reveals that, at any time, he can simply start throwing brick-a-brak around with his telekenesis. Pfft, why have duels at all?
Sorry, but I hate the telekenesis aspect of the Force that was grafted onto it for Empire Strikes Back. Kinda makes things a little too easy, if Jedi have to power to move all objects at will. What would they need lightsabers for? Or any other skill for that matter? It's too easy, and too cheesy. Personally, I'd like a little less Carrie in my Star Wars.
yeah but they look cool, and thats the best thing about them
Gaffertape wrote:
Yeah, I never had a problem with the original duel from Star Wars, and I had no idea anybody else did until Lucas himself started complaining about it. It always made perfect sense to me in the way they were fighting. And the sequels just built on that and made it slightly more intense. But you get to the prequels, and it's all just crazy, especially the one in ROTS, which is another reason why that movie is becoming, to me, the worst prequel.
canofhumdingers wrote:
i completely agree that the lightsaber duels should not be totally grounded in real sword fighting. As you say, it is, afterall, Star Wars. Not to mention lightsabers are unlike any type of sword ever made, opening the doors to all sorts of potential. add to this the fact that these are the weapons of Jedi, & you have the makings for some pretty fantastic fights. But that doesn't change the fact that there are some basic rules in close combat that are standard no matter what. one such example is, when you intend to block/deflect a powerful blow, you better be firmly planted or you're going to be dead.
I think ESB is a PERFECT example of a fantastic fight that, while completely impossible in the real world, is totally believable for the world presented on screen. The things they do make sense. when Luke is taking the full force of Vader's assault as he gets backed out onto the catwalk, he cowers down to get his center of gravity low to absorb the impact. He's certainly not jumping. While the techniques and moves are not textbook swordfighting, they (like many things in the OOT) have some basis in the world we actually live in which makes them familiar and acceptable, despite their fantastic nature. In fact, to me the ESB duel is a masterpiece of sorts just from a technical, stagecombat point of view. Anyone who's got some knowledge on the subject will quickly pick up on some subtleties (sp?) that are really neat. The way Luke fights shows an aggresive and courageous person with talent, but a severe lack of proper training/experience; which is exactly what his character is supposed to be at that point. Vader on the other hand is clealry a master and is in completle control of the fight the whole time. He overwhelms luke on a whim as he tries to intimidate luke into the dark side. But when luke begins to give in to his anger, vader backs off and takes the full brunt of luke's rage, clearly hoping he'll turn. It's also made clear that Vader's purpose is not to kill Luke, but to turn him as he has multiple opportunities to dispatch his son, but always hesitates just long enough, or swings just wide enough to allow Luke to escape certain death. & a moment that i love is, when Luke has one brilliant strike that actually lands, Vader immediately stops the fight by taking control once again and severing Lukes hand with the very next blow! To sum it up, luke is skillful, but unrefined; while vader is cool, powerful, and in total control. & i love that b/c, as anyone who has dueled someone far more skillful than themself can attest, it is incredibley intimidating when your opponent has clearly taken control of the fight and is working you into exactly the position they desire. & it's even more intimidating when they have done this, have the chance to beat you, but don't b/c they know they can keep you in that place and continue working you until you essentially defeat yourself.
Yeah, I never had a problem with the original duel from Star Wars, and I had no idea anybody else did until Lucas himself started complaining about it. It always made perfect sense to me in the way they were fighting. And the sequels just built on that and made it slightly more intense. But you get to the prequels, and it's all just crazy, especially the one in ROTS, which is another reason why that movie is becoming, to me, the worst prequel.
Obi Jeewhyen wrote:
Hahahah, I always thought the short duel from the original Star Wars was not only the most realistic, but the most dramatic. (Ok, Ben's twirl was like WTF, but I love it).
But the Ep. 1 duel looks real cool, and I can't deny that. Oh, not realistic?!?! Not a standard that I hold anything in the prequels to.
Wesyeed wrote (in reference to canofhumdinger's original post about kendo/fencing):
Wow deja vu. about 5 years ago someone said pretty much the same thing to me about how unrealistic the fighting in the pt is compared to the Ot. I agreed to some extent as far as the bouncing weightless cgi doubles are concerned but the realistic enough fencing thing I think is pretty moot when we're talking about star wars with jedi flying all over the place. Vader throws his saber at luke in rotj; I doubt a swordsman who doesn't have force powers would do that in real life. It's of course supposed to be cool and spectacular rather than perfectly accurate. But The fighting in AotC is the worst of them all I have to say. You can just tell absolutely none of the jedi have had any real martial arts training with a weapon whatsover. And I don't know the first thing about fencing so I'm have no idea what to look for as far as wrong footing and such is concerned, It's just the beauty in the well coreographed and intense lightsaber duel I admire that really shows how the jedi fought in their prime. Reality's the last thing on my mind while watching star wars.
Hahahah, I always thought the short duel from the original Star Wars was not only the most realistic, but the most dramatic. (Ok, Ben's twirl was like WTF, but I love it).
But the Ep. 1 duel looks real cool, and I can't deny that. Oh, not realistic?!?! Not a standard that I hold anything in the prequels to.
Wesyeed wrote (in reference to canofhumdinger's original post about kendo/fencing):
Wow deja vu. about 5 years ago someone said pretty much the same thing to me about how unrealistic the fighting in the pt is compared to the Ot. I agreed to some extent as far as the bouncing weightless cgi doubles are concerned but the realistic enough fencing thing I think is pretty moot when we're talking about star wars with jedi flying all over the place. Vader throws his saber at luke in rotj; I doubt a swordsman who doesn't have force powers would do that in real life. It's of course supposed to be cool and spectacular rather than perfectly accurate. But The fighting in AotC is the worst of them all I have to say. You can just tell absolutely none of the jedi have had any real martial arts training with a weapon whatsover. And I don't know the first thing about fencing so I'm have no idea what to look for as far as wrong footing and such is concerned, It's just the beauty in the well coreographed and intense lightsaber duel I admire that really shows how the jedi fought in their prime. Reality's the last thing on my mind while watching star wars.
canofhumdingers wrote:
i completely agree that the lightsaber duels should not be totally grounded in real sword fighting. As you say, it is, afterall, Star Wars. Not to mention lightsabers are unlike any type of sword ever made, opening the doors to all sorts of potential. add to this the fact that these are the weapons of Jedi, & you have the makings for some pretty fantastic fights. But that doesn't change the fact that there are some basic rules in close combat that are standard no matter what. one such example is, when you intend to block/deflect a powerful blow, you better be firmly planted or you're going to be dead.
I think ESB is a PERFECT example of a fantastic fight that, while completely impossible in the real world, is totally believable for the world presented on screen. The things they do make sense. when Luke is taking the full force of Vader's assault as he gets backed out onto the catwalk, he cowers down to get his center of gravity low to absorb the impact. He's certainly not jumping. While the techniques and moves are not textbook swordfighting, they (like many things in the OOT) have some basis in the world we actually live in which makes them familiar and acceptable, despite their fantastic nature. In fact, to me the ESB duel is a masterpiece of sorts just from a technical, stagecombat point of view. Anyone who's got some knowledge on the subject will quickly pick up on some subtleties (sp?) that are really neat. The way Luke fights shows an aggresive and courageous person with talent, but a severe lack of proper training/experience; which is exactly what his character is supposed to be at that point. Vader on the other hand is clealry a master and is in completle control of the fight the whole time. He overwhelms luke on a whim as he tries to intimidate luke into the dark side. But when luke begins to give in to his anger, vader backs off and takes the full brunt of luke's rage, clearly hoping he'll turn. It's also made clear that Vader's purpose is not to kill Luke, but to turn him as he has multiple opportunities to dispatch his son, but always hesitates just long enough, or swings just wide enough to allow Luke to escape certain death. & a moment that i love is, when Luke has one brilliant strike that actually lands, Vader immediately stops the fight by taking control once again and severing Lukes hand with the very next blow! To sum it up, luke is skillful, but unrefined; while vader is cool, powerful, and in total control. & i love that b/c, as anyone who has dueled someone far more skillful than themself can attest, it is incredibley intimidating when your opponent has clearly taken control of the fight and is working you into exactly the position they desire. & it's even more intimidating when they have done this, have the chance to beat you, but don't b/c they know they can keep you in that place and continue working you until you essentially defeat yourself.
Obi Jeewhyen wrote:
I will say that I agree almost wholeheartedly with canofhumdingers' comments re the ESB lightsaber duel.
The thing that wrecks it for me, and wrecks the Force for me in general, is all that wonderful control Vader exhibits over the entire duel is mocked and made pointless when he reveals that, at any time, he can simply start throwing brick-a-brak around with his telekenesis. Pfft, why have duels at all?
Sorry, but I hate the telekenesis aspect of the Force that was grafted onto it for Empire Strikes Back. Kinda makes things a little too easy, if Jedi have to power to move all objects at will. What would they need lightsabers for? Or any other skill for that matter? It's too easy, and too cheesy. Personally, I'd like a little less Carrie in my Star Wars.
canofhumdingers wrote:
Interesting. & i found that to be a great show of the total command of the force Vader had &, the telekinesis aspect seemed like a natural progression of the force to me. PLus it makes the duel that much more intense. After Vader has totally owned luke in the duel, he really pours on the heat, revealing that he doesn't even need the saber to defeat luke. I think that draws a neat parallel to the concept that, once someone has truely mastered the sword arts, they have mastered themselves & therefore, no longer need the sword. Of course, it's not quite in the same vein as the japanese concept seeing as Vader is evil & that concept is really referring to enlightenment in a good way.
As for the telekenisis negating the need for lightsabers, i don't think that's necessarily true. Take, as an example, the jedi knight video games. you can do some pretty amazing force-feats, but you can't do them all at once, or forever. you have mana, which is essentially "force stamina" the more intense the force action, the more of this "stamina meter" you use & the longer you have to wait for it to recharge before using it again. That sort of how i always envisoned using the force, even before those games came out. You can't do everything all the time. the force is a source of energy, & just like our physical body, you can only do so much for so long with it before you need to rest & recuperate. &, just like our physical body, the more you train in the force & the more you "work out" (for lack of a better phrase) with it, the stronger you become & the more you can do before giving out.
edit: this is also why i feel yoda should never be seen with a lightsaber!! He has reached such a high level of "oneness" with the force that he essentially IS the ultimate samurai. He has transcended the need for physical weapons.
Gaffertape wrote (in reference to the above Yode comment):
Amen. And the same goes for Palpatine, but I don't think it's quite an "enlightened" state so much as a too important to bother with fighting. Am I the only person who finds it weird that Palpatine didn't have guards stationed when Mace and the others showed up. He certainly had them in ROTJ, not to mention later in ROTS when Yoda shows up, as useless as they were.
EDIT: But I don't mind the telekenesis thing as long as it's someone really powerful using it. If every Jedi, including Luke and Ben, started whipping out telekenesis of large objects during fights all the time, that would be different. But, you know, minor things, like drawing a small, unfixed object like a lightsaber back to them is okay by me.
- Post
- #233360
- Topic
- How the prequels should’ve played out:
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/233360/action/topic#233360
- Time
Originally posted by: Obi Jeewhyen
Oh, and to atone for my continuance of the derail ... I will say that I agree almost wholeheartedly with canofhumdingers' comments re the ESB lightsaber duel.
The thing that wrecks it for me, and wrecks the Force for me in general, is all that wonderful control Vader exhibits over the entire duel is mocked and made pointless when he reveals that, at any time, he can simply start throwing brick-a-brak around with his telekenesis. Pfft, why have duels at all?
Sorry, but I hate the telekenesis aspect of the Force that was grafted onto it for Empire Strikes Back. Kinda makes things a little too easy, if Jedi have to power to move all objects at will. What would they need lightsabers for? Or any other skill for that matter? It's too easy, and too cheesy. Personally, I'd like a little less Carrie in my Star Wars.
But I guess that's just me.
.
Oh, and to atone for my continuance of the derail ... I will say that I agree almost wholeheartedly with canofhumdingers' comments re the ESB lightsaber duel.
The thing that wrecks it for me, and wrecks the Force for me in general, is all that wonderful control Vader exhibits over the entire duel is mocked and made pointless when he reveals that, at any time, he can simply start throwing brick-a-brak around with his telekenesis. Pfft, why have duels at all?
Sorry, but I hate the telekenesis aspect of the Force that was grafted onto it for Empire Strikes Back. Kinda makes things a little too easy, if Jedi have to power to move all objects at will. What would they need lightsabers for? Or any other skill for that matter? It's too easy, and too cheesy. Personally, I'd like a little less Carrie in my Star Wars.
But I guess that's just me.
.
Interesting. & i found that to be a great show of the total command of the force Vader had &, the telekinesis aspect seemed like a natural progression of the force to me. PLus it makes the duel that much more intense. After Vader has totally owned luke in the duel, he really pours on the heat, revealing that he doesn't even need the saber to defeat luke. I think that draws a neat parallel to the concept that, once someone has truely mastered the sword arts, they have mastered themselves & therefore, no longer need the sword. Of course, it's not quite in the same vein as the japanese concept seeing as Vader is evil & that concept is really referring to enlightenment in a good way.
As for the telekenisis negating the need for lightsabers, i don't think that's necessarily true. Take, as an example, the jedi knight video games. you can do some pretty amazing force-feats, but you can't do them all at once, or forever. you have mana, which is essentially "force stamina" the more intense the force action, the more of this "stamina meter" you use & the longer you have to wait for it to recharge before using it again. That sort of how i always envisoned using the force, even before those games came out. You can't do everything all the time. the force is a source of energy, & just like our physical body, you can only do so much for so long with it before you need to rest & recuperate. &, just like our physical body, the more you train in the force & the more you "work out" (for lack of a better phrase) with it, the stronger you become & the more you can do before giving out.
edit: this is also why i feel yoda should never be seen with a lightsaber!! He has reached such a high level of "oneness" with the force that he essentially IS the ultimate samurai. He has transcended the need for physical weapons.
- Post
- #233196
- Topic
- How the prequels should’ve played out:
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/233196/action/topic#233196
- Time
I think ESB is a PERFECT example of a fantastic fight that, while completely impossible in the real world, is totally believable for the world presented on screen. The things they do make sense. when Luke is taking the full force of Vader's assault as he gets backed out onto the catwalk, he cowers down to get his center of gravity low to absorb the impact. He's certainly not jumping. While the techniques and moves are not textbook swordfighting, they (like many things in the OOT) have some basis in the world we actually live in which makes them familiar and acceptable, despite their fantastic nature. In fact, to me the ESB duel is a masterpiece of sorts just from a technical, stagecombat point of view. Anyone who's got some knowledge on the subject will quickly pick up on some subtleties (sp?) that are really neat. The way Luke fights shows an aggresive and courageous person with talent, but a severe lack of proper training/experience; which is exactly what his character is supposed to be at that point. Vader on the other hand is clealry a master and is in completle control of the fight the whole time. He overwhelms luke on a whim as he tries to intimidate luke into the dark side. But when luke begins to give in to his anger, vader backs off and takes the full brunt of luke's rage, clearly hoping he'll turn. It's also made clear that Vader's purpose is not to kill Luke, but to turn him as he has multiple opportunities to dispatch his son, but always hesitates just long enough, or swings just wide enough to allow Luke to escape certain death. & a moment that i love is, when Luke has one brilliant strike that actually lands, Vader immediately stops the fight by taking control once again and severing Lukes hand with the very next blow! To sum it up, luke is skillful, but unrefined; while vader is cool, powerful, and in total control. & i love that b/c, as anyone who has dueled someone far more skillful than themself can attest, it is incredibley intimidating when your opponent has clearly taken control of the fight and is working you into exactly the position they desire. & it's even more intimidating when they have done this, have the chance to beat you, but don't b/c they know they can keep you in that place and continue working you until you essentially defeat yourself.
Anyway, i've derailed this thread enough. maybe i'll start a new one to see if there's any interest to continue the topic
- Post
- #232950
- Topic
- How the prequels should’ve played out:
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/232950/action/topic#232950
- Time
The Duel of the Fates ( which to this day I think is the greatest lightsaber fight on film. No CGI bull shit doubles or artsy glow stick dancing. ESB's the most dramatic, but for pure spectacle this is the king.)
Have to disagree with you here. i watched the TPM duel the other day for the first time in forever & i couldn't stand it. I've taken Olympic style fencing lessons for several years and recently started taking Kendo (japanese "samurai style" fencing) and Iaido (the art of drawing the sword and killing the antagonist, from an unassuming position - i.e. sitting on the floor eating a bowl of rice & someone attacks you). The TPM fight just made me cringe! Ewan McGreggor jumps off the ground EVERY time he blocks* a blow!!! You would NEVER do that! you'd get killed in a heartbeat! In fact, in kendo you never even allow your feet to cross (much less, leave the ground)! You keep you right foot forward & your left foot back in a very agressive stance. you move in an awkward(at first) way similar to how a child would run with a "stick pony" when playing cowboy. & you lift your feet just enough to be able to move them, effectively "gliding" across the ground. This is so that, when you run into your opponent, if you don't succeed at killing them, they can't knock you over when you run into each other. Having one foot forward & one back is a very stable/powerful position. if your feet are close together, or worse yet, in the air!!, you're a dead man. This doesn't even bring up the point of the ridiculous twirling baton lightsabers of the prequels! The OOT fights were at least reasonably believable as they were based on ACTUAL swordfighting techniques (& honetly, the ANH duel is probably most realistic). I'm a huge fan of swordfighting and can go a long way in forgiving the over-the-top fights from hollywood when they at least try to mimic something that you might actually do, but the prequels are just laughable. They remind me too much of the sword twirling you see at karate tournaments (not to knock karate, it has lots of cool aspects, but the majority of people you see using swords in a karate demo or tournament have no idea how to actually fight with one) Sorry for the rant, i've been chewing on that for a few days now...
*in my experience, you very rarely "block" in a swordfight. you either dodge altogether, which leaves your oppenent open for the brief moment they've extended to strike you, which gives you the chance to kill them. Or, you parry, which is not to block, but deflect the attck in such a way as to make an opening from which you can immediately attack. This attack is called the riposte (pronounced ruh-post or ree-post depending on who you talk to). Of course, this is mostly from my olympic style fencing experience, of which i practiced foil and epee, but really focused on sabre. I've only been taking kendo for the past 4 months or so & we're still working mainly on footwork and swinging the sword correctly. It's a very slow learning curve, like any sword art, and we probably won't begin thinking about the defense side of things for months to come.
- Post
- #230280
- Topic
- getting rid of "halos"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230280/action/topic#230280
- Time
Thanks for the help!
- Post
- #230177
- Topic
- getting rid of "halos"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230177/action/topic#230177
- Time
- Post
- #230097
- Topic
- getting rid of "halos"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230097/action/topic#230097
- Time
Anyways, to all you A/V files out there, i need some help with my dvd player. I recently got a new HD 16x9 tv. It's a 30" Phillips and is an actual picture tube. I'm having some major issues from painfully obvious halos on every dvd i watch (like the ones you get from too much edge enhancement or having the sharpness set too high). I know it's not the tv, as all our cable channels (analogue, digital, and HD) look fine (no halos) as do my laserdiscs. The thing that really confuses me though, is that turning the sharpness setting up actually makes the halos get better!? of course, to make the halos completely disappear, you have to turn the sharpness up so high that the picture looks like crap & all fine detail is gone. Another interesting bit about the sharpness feature is that turning it down too low (below about 35 or 30 on a scale of 100) actually makes anything look like "double vision". i.e. - there's two of whatever you're looking at mostly overlapping each other, but not quite lined up. But, as i said, when properly adjusted, everything looks great EXCEPT for those danged halos on dvd!! I've tested many dvds, so i know it's not just really bad edge enhancement on one or two discs. I've tried adjusting every setting on the tv, but only the sharpness makes any difference. The only thing i can think of that might be causing it is that i have a cheap (one of those $30 Cyberhome numbers from Walmart) dvd player hooked up with cheap video cables (the yellow, red & white ones). Would upgrading to a higher quality cable (maybe an s-video, or a component cable) help this? Or could it be the cheapo dvd player? I have also noticed, when looking really closely, what i can only describe as looking like the analogue "noise" you see on laserdiscs (the Definitve Star Wars discs being a prime example) when watching dvds. It's very slight, and i only saw it when i was scrutinzing those danged halos. during normal viewing, no one would ever see that "noise," but it is there. For all i know, that may be normal on dvd's & i just never noticed it.
Wow, that took a lot longer than i thought to explain, but my big question is, can anyone give me some tips on getting rid of those halos?!?! I already plan on picking up a calibration dvd sometime soon so i can get all my colors/ black levels/ contrast set up properly (thank you X0Project tutorials!!) but i fear that won't solve this problem.
- Post
- #229218
- Topic
- What did the Prequel Trilogy need?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/229218/action/topic#229218
- Time
- Post
- #228862
- Topic
- first viewing of the 2006 OOT dvds
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/228862/action/topic#228862
- Time
- Post
- #217488
- Topic
- The Official Lucasfilm Response
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/217488/action/topic#217488
- Time
I wonder how people would feel if da Vinci came back from the dead and repainted the Mona Lisa to look like Pamela Anderson because his tastes changed?
Sorry to go off on a tangent, but, after the stupidity with which the "Da Vinci Code" has blinded the general populace, i have to correct you. (No, i'm not saying you're dumb, just that people have been fed all sorts of falsities from that book/movie) & this is one i just can't stand. Leonardo da Vinci's name is LEONARDO. Da Vinci is NOT A NAME. It simply clarifies that you're talking about Leonardo from the town of Vinci, and not some other Leonardo. It'd be like if you knew a guy named Bob who was born in Chicago and contantly referred to him as "from Chicago"..... "hey, from Chicago, wanna go catch a movie tonight?"
Oh, & that's not the best example either. If i recall correctly, it's widely believed/accepted that Leonardo carried the Mona Lisa around with him for most of his life & did make changes to it. (the one that comes to mind is that she was originally bracketed by columns on either side, but he later cut them off.)
- Post
- #215095
- Topic
- A Very Star Wars Christmas
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/215095/action/topic#215095
- Time
- Post
- #206932
- Topic
- FS: Han Shot First T-shirts
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206932/action/topic#206932
- Time
wierd. they changed it. i have the old version (which i like better than any of the others i've seen)
- Post
- #206930
- Topic
- FS: Han Shot First T-shirts
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206930/action/topic#206930
- Time
- Post
- #206071
- Topic
- ITS HAPPENED-- OOT AVAILABLE FROM LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206071/action/topic#206071
- Time
Anyways, back to jumping up and down victoriously in my "Han Shot First" t-shirt!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH!!!!!
- Post
- #195465
- Topic
- End of SE ROTJ...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/195465/action/topic#195465
- Time
- Post
- #169596
- Topic
- Burning video dvds on Macs
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/169596/action/topic#169596
- Time
- Post
- #169567
- Topic
- Burning video dvds on Macs
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/169567/action/topic#169567
- Time
- Post
- #169548
- Topic
- Burning video dvds on Macs
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/169548/action/topic#169548
- Time
- Post
- #138505
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Code 3 Millennium Falcon
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/138505/action/topic#138505
- Time
a very nice falcon: falcon


another nice one:
this one's great:
http://www.spacemodelmania.com/models/gallery4/al_falcon.htm
Again, very nice:
http://www.starshipmodeler.org/gallery7/ta_falcon.htm
Here's an incredible x-wing:
http://www.starshipmodeler.org/gallery9/dg_xwing.htm





Here's the main starwars page (go to the bottom of the page. in the first drop down menu that says "select a category to view," scroll through & select Star Wars & click GO): http://starshipmodeler.com/gallery/gallery.cfm
- Post
- #118331
- Topic
- neat little thing from ESB linking to PT
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/118331/action/topic#118331
- Time
OK, what, from the get-go, was problematic for Anakin that ultimately led him down the dark path? his fear. fear of leaving/losing his mother, fear of losing Padme, etc. We know from yoda that fear, anger, & hate lead to the dark path. Anakin was never able to control his fear which ultimately led to the other two emotions & thus the dark side.
fast forward to Luke's confrontation with Vader in the carbon freezing chamber. during the battle, Vader says, "Obiwan has taught you well. You have controlled your fear. Now, release your anger, only your hatred can destroy me!" & from that point on both Vader and the Emperor continue to encourage anger and hatred in their attempts to turn Luke. How cool is that? They see that Luke overcame his father's fault. He was able to control fear & thus, they move forward down the line in the emotions that lead to the dark side.
It's just the little things like that that really get me going.
- Post
- #118233
- Topic
- Wanted: 12 inch Sith Lords
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/118233/action/topic#118233
- Time
- Post
- #117043
- Topic
- Most Powerful Quote in all the Star Wars films.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/117043/action/topic#117043
- Time
As for my personal pick, I'd go with "Don't make me destroy you!" the delivery is great & powerful. Plus, Vader just totally owned Luke through the whole fight, toying with him along the way (if you know much about real sword combat, you can see many instances when Vader has a perfect shot to slice Luke into pieces, but either hesitates or intentionally swings wide b/c his goal is not to kill Luke, but to dominate him & strike fear into him, in hopes of turning him to the darkside too.) He's just rubbing salt in the wound at this point, essentially saying, "dude! i just totally owned your butt! give up already!" in a much more powerful and frightening way.
- Post
- #116475
- Topic
- emperor slugs
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/116475/action/topic#116475
- Time