Ziggy Stardust said:
bkev said:
Charles Xavier said:
Heterochromia is in reference to [Bowie's] eyes, which I have to say are stunning. One [hazel], one blue. It's a mutation. It's a very groovy mutation.
No, WRONG.
He was punched in the face as a teenager in a fight over a girl.
Maybe Anchorhead will be less of a sourpuss and let us have fun with that...
Congrats Silverwook! I don't see you much outside of General Star Wars, but your posts are always well thought out.
September 11th, 2001. I'll preface this by saying even though I barely remember the day, I understand for many it was a day of tragedy. However, instead of focusing on the past, I remember the patriotic spirit that the country was overfilled with and attempt to live it in my daily life. I suggest you do the same. Long live America and the freedom it represents.
Personally I'm against knowing the names at all, but not necessarily the twins. And you don't know who takes either of the children, leaving some mystery.
Charles Xavier said:
Heterochromia is in reference to [Bowie's] eyes, which I have to say are stunning. One [hazel], one blue. It's a mutation. It's a very groovy mutation.
Searched Ell the Ewok on a whim because I kinda miss the guy. Then saw Nanner as Groucho. Damn.
off-topic: for those who don't know Kino Video, they work with a lot of public domain movies (Phantom of the Opera, Nosferatu etc) and their releases are considered rather high quality. They're the guys who currently release the restored versions of Metropolis.
Ziggy Stardust said:
Sgt. Pepper
I'm going to echo this sentiment and suggest that you let the original credits run entirely and then have maybe a 5-second gap before displaying your credits separately in a different style, similar to how Lowry treated the Bond movies.
This isn't exactly new news, I believe we'd heard that from the beginning.
Sluggo said:
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; line-height: normal; font-size: small;">
<div>
Monolithium said:
The Cutter said:
those who are tired of it all, join me in the dark side !! The truth is here !! : <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc" target="_blank" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc" target="_blank" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc" target="_blank" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc" target="_blank" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc" target="_blank" title="www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GvpT_7BMAc</a>
Brilliant. Brilliant, I say!
<div></div>
<div>This was over in the blu-ray thread. It wasn't bad.</div>
</div>
</span>
Looks a bit red, but not bad shape. Most of the official trailers were competently transferred to the DVD set.
Extreme power outage in my new backyard. Luckily, University of San Diego has generators that can last... till tomorrow. Here's hoping they fix this shit pronto.
^Yes, please! I would love to use those.
Wasn't there a different image there before that was cropped less?
Yeah, but I was expecting at least a few more people to weigh in...
It uses the Microsoft Silverlight plugin, if that means anything...
Harmy's new avatar... ?
So, really? Nobody has anything to say about this? Maybe I never should've mentioned the idea of splitting the forums, then perhaps the rest of my suggestions might have been taken into account. This is really the time to redesign the site again, even if it's just adding a section.
^SilverWook he's not worth your time.
When he has the right team behind him the man is a genius.
xhonzi said:
bkev said:
Yeah yeah, less apology more articulation. That's kind of what I was asking for.
Alright-
I've never cared for Wonder Woman. I think she does far more damage to the "comics as a respectful story telling medium" than good.
I can sort of appreciate the recent attempts at cleaning up her image (giving her pants and a... lower... neckline) but I think her star spangled bottom is sort of at the heart of her "character". Well, that's not really fair to say. Just because I don't care for her as a character and have only ever seen her as superficial window dressing doesn't mean that there aren't people out there somewhere that like her for her "sparkling personality". I just don't see it personally.
I think cleaning her up sort of makes her unnecessary all around. Not trashy enough to be eye candy, not interesting enough to be anything else. I think she's a product of an earlier age and it doesn't surprise me that she hasn't gotten any new media off the ground.
Yeah yeah, less apology more articulation. That's kind of what I was asking for.
^Obnoxious Trend, is Obnoxious. You could at least try and have an intelligent response instead of "fixing" my post. I mean come on, it's not like the Linda Carter series post-season-one was very dignified anyway.