Ziz

That won't do any good if it's someone remote controlling his machine in real time.

ben_danger said:

what scale is the wampa going to be?

 

you should name it too. snowball is my favourite.

Fluffy.

Next time you have to order something, would it be better to spring the extra few $ to use UPS, FedEx, or some other shipping company unrelated to the post office, or do you have the same problems dealing with them over there?

Ady, how do you know those other people didn't get your Falcon?  They could have just gotten a $200 model for $6 for all you know!

There's other ways to get it besides torrents.  PM me.

alex s said:

I was going to ask if you're using the original untouched shot of the Enterprise when she's leaving the spacedock? You know? Where you can see the black arm that comes out from underneath the ship and covers the stars as it passes in front of them.

 They fixed/erased it for the Director's Edition.

That's what you see in this pic

 

The bottom shot must be an early FX/lighting test pic.  The hull doesn't have NCC-1701 on it.

From a business perspective, it would also be great for Disney, as now people would go thru three or four times in the same day to try and see all the destinations, as opposed to going thru once.

Most likely wider shots are CG - digital matte paintings - and a lot of action that they couldn't have direct control over in the real world - Mutt swinging with the monkeys, ant attack, chases, extensive camera tracking moves, things like that.

Yeah, maybe if you move the SD to the other side behind Vader, leave the TIE and Falcon as is.

In related SW parody news, in the Adult Swim lead in to Robot Chicken a few nights ago, they said "Robot Chicken Star Wars 3.....eventually".

EyeShotFirst said:

It took them 20 years to make the last one. Is Indy going to be a grumpy old man for this. It is funny though the last couple of years 80's stars who are old now are playing their 80's roles. Sylvester Stallone 2 times.

Hollywood has become paranoid of new ideas.  They'd rather pull old ones out of retirement or obscurity rather than come up with something truly new and creative.

Hey Vaderios, one suggestion - can you post your before and after pics top-to-bottom instead of left-to-right?  Less side scrolling.

Vaderisnothayden said:

Ziz said:

Sluggo said:

Also, Speilberg needs to grow a pair.  If George ever comes up with another alien idea, Steven needs to stop it dead in it's tracks.

 

Ironic, since there's stories about Lucas having to reign Spielberg in on "Raiders"

 

GL: "OK, Steven, you said you were just going to kill 'a couple of Germans in this scene."

SS: "Nazis.  I'm killing Nazis.  I like Germans."

GL: "Fine.  How many is 'a couple'?"

SS: "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6....10 guys.  That's 'a couple'."

GL: "That's a dozen!"

SS: "George, I'm making a really big movie here."

GL: "Yes, I realize that, Steven, but there's a difference between a simple murder and a cult massacre!"

 

Are those actual real quotes? Did Spielberg actually get overenthusiastic about killing off Nazis?

 

Taken from "Skywalking - the Life and Films of George Lucas".  I have an original copy from the mid 80's.  Don't know if subsequent releases were edited or changed in any way.

Ok, I had the numbers wrong on TOD and Raiders.  I was posting from memory earlier.  For Crusade, I was home and had the DVD to reference.

Yep, that's dated too.  The Young Indy bit says "Utah 1912" and then it becomes "Portugese Coast, 1938", so since Raiders is also 1938, you can put it either just before or just after Last Crusade.

Don't you have the discs?  Wouldn't it be faster to check this for yourself instead of waiting for someone to answer on here?

Ripplin said:

Another off-topic post, but related to earlier conversation: I just saw a trailer on TV for Fanboys! "Coming to Blu-Ray and DVD June 2nd." That was a surprise.

Well, either they changed the date after the commercial was made or BJ's broke the release date because I bought it there last week.

Yes, right at the start of the film.  As Indy is coming in to Club Obi-Wan, "Shanghai, 1936" flashes on the screen.  In Raiders, it says "Peru, 1938".

Sluggo said:

Also, Speilberg needs to grow a pair.  If George ever comes up with another alien idea, Steven needs to stop it dead in it's tracks.

Ironic, since there's stories about Lucas having to reign Spielberg in on "Raiders"

GL: "OK, Steven, you said you were just going to kill 'a couple of Germans in this scene."

SS: "Nazis.  I'm killing Nazis.  I like Germans."

GL: "Fine.  How many is 'a couple'?"

SS: "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6....10 guys.  That's 'a couple'."

GL: "That's a dozen!"

SS: "George, I'm making a really big movie here."

GL: "Yes, I realize that, Steven, but there's a difference between a simple murder and a cult massacre!"

ChainsawAsh said:

So, since Terminator Salvation starts off at a 6.5 for me, I have a strong feeling that once McG's supposed director's cut comes out, a fanedit of that can bump it up to about a 7 or 7.5.

Depends what, if any, deleted material there will be to work with for an edit.  Also, see this article for the good and bad of what T:S was supposed to be.

6 part tutorial on building the FM Falcon

It's a Japanese TV show, but modeling is universal, so you can still follow it even if you don't read or speak Japanese.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/

Yeah, I guess it is just a random coincidence.  ',:-\

I didn't say "audience", I said "people".  Producers, directors and casting agents are people too.

Yes, audiences typcast actors into roles too, but that's as a result of the decisions made by the Hollywood suits making films and shows in the first place.

I did notice one mistake where someone screwed up dates.  At one point, Kyle says he was born in 1975.

The movie takes place in 2018.  That puts Kyle at 43 years old in the film.  Kyle gets sent back to 1984 from 2029.  That means Kyle is 54 when he goes back to save Sarah.

Methinks Kyle was supposed to have said 1995.  That makes him 23 in this film and 34 when he saves Sarah.

Actors are only typecast in the minds of people who are too lazy or stupid to separate the actor from the character (s)he portrays.

Damn...I thought it was me.  I PM'ed Ady a link to a vendor here in the US that I've dealt with that has them too.