- Post
- #1176841
- Topic
- The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1176841/action/topic#1176841
- Time
OK
But why ?
OK
But why ?
I think that sounds more sensible than the idea that stuff just is the way it is because.
I’m not sure if Bruce Hornsby will agree with you.
Good luck Poita!
There is testimony we can acquire, but that is not irrefutable nor scientific.
…how do you know that?
Are you asking how do I know there is testimony we can acquire? Or as you asking why it wouldn’t be irrefutable or scientific?
Yes, your second question.
Because that’s not how science works. With testimony, there is credibility in question. How credible is the witness? and so forth. By its nature, testimony is subject to unprovable scrutiny (that is, scientific scruity, not court-of-law scrutiny) and is not irrefutable.
To refute testimony scientifically is to use the wrong test. The correct test would be “beyond a reasonable doubt” as in a court or some such.
How would there be testimony at the dawn of the universe? Nobody was alive back then. I don’t understand your point.
Testimony about it. From the dawn of our universe.
I’m not sure if I quite understand what you’re saying, but testimony can obviously be falsifiable. Let’s say I propose that flowers grow from seeds. You could test this testimony to find out if I’m right or wrong. I think the same could be applied to the dawn of the universe.
That’s what I said. That’s why it’s not irrefutable nor scientific to use testimony as scientific data.
Is the testimony of some guy born 1250 years after Abraham’s presumed birthdate less refutable ?
Because that is what the Bible is. And this is a fact…
God literally created time and space.
Citation needed.
Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?
I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.
As opposed to it happening spontaneously?
Yes.
To assume so makes far less sense. The universe is too complex, intricate and balanced to have been completely generated from nothing by nothing for no reason.
Opinion noted.
It’s the same thing people say about evolution.
What do people say about evolution?
To say that animals evolve to suit their environment, or that genetic mutations win or lose out over time to the ultimate change of a species or development of new ones… that’s not the same things as to say that humans evolved from primates.
Well, technically speaking, Humans ARE primates.
double post.
Finally I agree.
In Frink we trust.
It’s the creation of the universe we’re talking about here. It can’t be fact. None of it. Not to us. You know that.
No, I don’t.
God literally created time and space.
Citation needed.
Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?
I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.
As opposed to it happening spontaneously?
Yes.
To assume so makes far less sense. The universe is too complex, intricate and balanced to have been completely generated from nothing by nothing for no reason.
Citation needed.
Looks like you presents a fact to me. Again.…far less sense to me.
Seriously. -.-
More acceptable. Thank you. Seriously.
God literally created time and space.
Citation needed.
Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?
I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.
As opposed to it happening spontaneously?
Yes.
To assume so makes far less sense. The universe is too complex, intricate and balanced to have been completely generated from nothing by nothing for no reason.
Citation needed.
Looks like you present a fact to me. Again.
Yes
God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.
And therefore, because he created time itself and space itself, he is omnipotent and omnipresent because he is capable of being everywhere all the time.
Also, people who discount the existence of angels have never considered the concept of extradimensional planes of existence on which other beings may exist and be capable of some level of interaction with this one.Apparently, you take everything literally as undeniable facts that must be read in the first degree without thinking nor smiling: the Bible as much as Frink’s posts …
Regarding the Bible: I did not say my understanding of God creating time and space is fact. It is my understanding.
God literally created time and space.
Citation needed.
Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?
I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.
As opposed to it happening spontaneously?
you act like you just made an irrefutable point
No.
You said “God literally created time and space.”.
It looks like you present it as an indeniable fact to me…But you are inferring that on your own. I did not say it is indeniable.
No, you just said “it’s a fact”.
God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.
And therefore, because he created time itself and space itself, he is omnipotent and omnipresent because he is capable of being everywhere all the time.
Also, people who discount the existence of angels have never considered the concept of extradimensional planes of existence on which other beings may exist and be capable of some level of interaction with this one.Apparently, you take everything literally as undeniable facts that must be read in the first degree without thinking nor smiling: the Bible as much as Frink’s posts …
Regarding the Bible: I did not say my understanding of God creating time and space is fact. It is my understanding.
God literally created time and space.
Citation needed.
Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?
I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.
As opposed to it happening spontaneously?
you act like you just made an irrefutable point
No.
You said “God literally created time and space.”.
It looks like you present it as an indeniable fact to me…
God literally created time and space.
Citation needed.
Now really. How would he have explained the space-time continuum to people who lived thousands of years ago? And when such an explanation would have been beside the point?
I didn’t ask for a citation on how he created it, I asked for a citation on that he created it.
As opposed to it happening spontaneously?
you act like you just made an irrefutable point, but i don’t see it.
I happen to 99% believe that God created everything.
Only 99%?
In my universe, 99% is everything.
God literally created time and space. There was no “beginning” before the beginning because before the beginning there was no time. As our universe expands, so does the boundaries of the space-time continuum. God created it. Therefore, he does not have to exist within it.
And therefore, because he created time itself and space itself, he is omnipotent and omnipresent because he is capable of being everywhere all the time.
Also, people who discount the existence of angels have never considered the concept of extradimensional planes of existence on which other beings may exist and be capable of some level of interaction with this one.
Apparently, you take everything literally as undeniable facts that must be read in the first degree without thinking nor smiling: the Bible as much as Frink’s posts …
“Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering”
(Hulk’s hidden son)
Oh my god, I didn’t know the Green Lama. You just changed my life.
You guys can’t even read how am I supposed to fight? It’s the green robot madness all over again.
poor radioactive comicbook character 😉
Could you please show more respect to Hulk?
Needs more smaller Hulks.
OK
Make The Posts Look Weird As Possible!
Ok
The answer is 42.
How Many Quoted Posts Can We Get?
42
I don’t need your screenshots, you are obviously playing or trolling. You ask about something you already know, then you pretend that darthsolo was banned before you join this forum (so why asking about someone you don’t ever know ?), then you change your story one more time.
And now you loose your punctuation again.
So please one last time: don’t play or troll with such serious matters. Please.