logo Sign In

Wazzles

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Dec-2013
Last activity
17-Jun-2025
Posts
1,167

Post History

Post
#1089987
Topic
The Simpsons: Embiggened Edition (* on hiatus *)
Time

Chewielewis said:

I guess an ideal preservation would be to reasseble the episodes from the 35mm neg which would get rid of both wobble and cel edges, but as this would be largely impossible. Deinterlacing and IVTCing gets us one step closer to the cells as they appear on the negative (99% will be original progressive frames rather than interpolated frames).

Then you would have to re-do all the video effects, which the early seasons made extensive use of.

Post
#1089985
Topic
Who Designed The CGI Jabba In The 1997 Special Edition?
Time

Nandi said:

I am possibly the only person on planet that loves 1997 version of Jabba more then bluray version. I am aware that it lacks details, and has a more crude shape, but to me it lightning and its shape felt more realistic, blu ray version seams more cartoony. I have to defend myself by saying I am artist, aka not visually illiterate: http://i.imgur.com/KFCkWxq.jpg and 3d artist http://i.imgur.com/vorw9DN.jpg

I can see why, but despite the shitty lighting, the model and lip-sync are superior. It’s the same model used in TPM, and it looks way better there.

Post
#1083405
Topic
The Phantom Menace HD Theatrical Reconstruction (rough draft uploaded) (a WIP)
Time

LHSmarchingredcoat said:

Also of note, the Battlefront II Theed gameplay debuted this week, and noticed this little detail
https://imgur.com/gallery/Xln7c
It appears that (for this pre-alpha at least) the digital assets from TPM were used for the Theed palace, assets that DO NOT include the bridge added in to the “canon” Blu Ray and DVD. wondering if the team working on BFII either overlooked this for the alpha, or if it’s an intentional detail, seeing as how nuanced and attentive they’ve been with the rest of the map.

I thought most of these were model shots?

Post
#1082619
Topic
Any interest in professionally made box sets for Despecialized?
Time

TheKidd84 said:

Then I agree that digipacks are the best options.

But what do we do in terms of specs and such? I assume our own Despecialized sets vary in terms of audio options, subtitles, special features, number of discs (anywhere from 1 to 3 per film) etc.?

I think the specs should be relatively generic so we could use these for any number of preservations. Just including simple things like year, aspect ratio, and run time should be sufficient.

Post
#1082617
Topic
When Did The Star Wars Prequels Become Cool?
Time

lovelikewinter said:

The pesky whipper-snappers who grew up on crap like Twilight and Harry Potter moved into other fandoms. Since they are easy to please the creators have little incentive to make good stuff when they can half ass any old garbage and make the bucks. They ruined Doctor Who and they tried to ruin Star Wars.

What the hell do you have against Harry Potter? Also, I have a Chrome plugin that replaces the word “millenial” with “pesky whipper-snappers”, so ignore the edit.

Post
#1081116
Topic
The Phantom Menace HD Theatrical Reconstruction (rough draft uploaded) (a WIP)
Time

LHSmarchingredcoat said:

Darth Lucas said:

Hey, great project and can’t wait to see how progress goes when you update it. However, you should probably remove the google drive link, as direct links to fanedits aren’t allowed on this forum.

Ahh, gotcha. Any suggestions for the best place to upload them?

Myspleen is the go-to for most Star Wars edits.

Post
#1077563
Topic
TITANIC 35mm Preservation! (a WIP)
Time

RU.08 said:

yotsuya said:

That is awesome for a raw scan of a print. I can’t say that the changes to this film bother me as they do for some films. I appreciate the removal of the out of place elements and the correction of the sky. Not sure why they changed the sky in the flying scene. I’d have to watch it and see if I like the new version or not. But as I don’t have this film on blu-ray and my copy is the original version on DVD, I would be very interested in seeing the final product.

The Bluray is obscenely revisionist. Have a look at the Title card:

35mm (optical compositing):

Bluray (“glorious” digital compositing):

How can you tell? It looks pretty much the same to me.