logo Sign In

Warbler

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
7-May-2003
Last activity
28-May-2021
Posts
18,708

Post History

Post
#122217
Topic
MANGLER BROS., INC. IS NOW CLOSED HERE
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/122217/action/topic#122217
Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa


you dont understand thou super glue is stronger then skin, so you when break the bond its the bond of your tissues

super glue maybe stronger than normal skin, but not the Warbhulk's.

Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab


*Sprays Mace in Warbler's eyes&*


*the mace angers Warbler and so he turns into the Warbhulk once again and makes Chaltab eat his can of mace. Then the Warbhulk pounds Shim into submisson*
Post
#122188
Topic
MANGLER BROS., INC. IS NOW CLOSED HERE
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/122188/action/topic#122188
Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa


and warbler so your sayign that when you transformed you ripped your ass off. so now you cant sit


No I'm saying that the Warbhulk is strong enough to break the hold of the superglue, thus freeing the Warbhulks hands(without damaging his butt), and allowing to remove the staples from his month. I would have thought that was obvious.



*Warbhulk destroys everyone in the thread.*
Post
#122203
Topic
War of the Worlds
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/122203/action/topic#122203
Time
Just saw The War Of The Worlds last night. Good movie. I found it difficult to go to sleep afterwards. Spielburg did an excellent job on this film.

Spoiler

I don't think I'll ever forget the roar the alien ships make, or the effect of the heat rays turning people to ash in seconds. Very frightening. I surprised it didn't get an R-rating. But I must say that having the ships buried on earth years before, was a bad idea. It created an unnecessary plot hole.
Post
#121969
Topic
Rankings
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/121969/action/topic#121969
Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa
hey guys i wonder who is going to get to 3000 posts first, warbler, or the ranks thread.


But are we talking about 3000 pages? this thread is nowhere near close to that. If you are talking about 3000 posts on this thread, well how are you going to find out how many posts have been posted to this thread? It will take awful long time to go back and count them. Also remember this thread was deleted once, how are you going to count the
deleted posts?
Post
#121959
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/121959/action/topic#121959
Time
Ok JediSage I owe you an apology. The was an actual reported case of a teacher throwing Bibles into the trash. Althought the lawsuit has been dropped and the school district denies that any Bibles were thrown into the trash. So its just a question of who you believe. Again I'm sorry I jumped the gun. Its just I had never heard of the incident and found it difficult that it could have happened without me knowing since I watch the news and read the paper daily. I apologize. However it would seem to be an isolated incident.

Originally posted by: JediSage


I find it odd that we need to oppress freedom in order to attain it, however, I'll bite:



I never said that. All I meant was that how can someone have true freedom of religion, without having to right to chose no religion at all? without being able to chose not to belief
in God?

Originally posted by: JediSage


So, in other words, anyone who assumes public office or works in government automatically abbrogates their right to the free exercise of religion? Must they now take a vow of official atheism prior to taking the position?


No, what it means is that they can't use/abbuse their position to support their religion

example: A school teacher can't use their position to preacher their religious views to thier students. However, that same school teacher has every right to practice his/her faith, As long as doing so doesn't violate someone else's rights.

Originally posted by: JediSage


Keep in mind that appeasing all faiths via a position of no faith is just as much of a philosophy as any religion. By definition it's excluding the people who believe and practice their faiths.


Now, just how is the Government excluding you by appeasing you? Maybe its a philosophy as any religion as you say, but if it is, does that mean we should drop it and just pick a religion to support and what one should that be and why? Whichever one we pick is going to offend someone. All I am saying is the Government shouldn't be in the position of deciding what religion is right and what religions aren't. It should treat all religions equally and that includes Atheists.

Post
#121687
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/121687/action/topic#121687
Time
Originally posted by: JediSage


None of our founding documents forbids the oft forgot second half of the "establishment" clause from being practiced in, on, or around public grounds or buildings, yet the secular establishment, using tax payer dollars and municipal funds to pay court fees, is continually assaulting religious people/groups/organizations on that particular issue. We now live in a society where children who try to read bibles during their free time in public schools have their bibles siezed and thrown in the garbage by school beaurocrats with a secular axe to grind. Yes, there are many grey areas, but let's be clear about who's at which end of the lash right now.

And the reason why Christmas and Easter will never be excised is because they've been stripped of all their Christian meaning, and secularized to the ground (Happy Holidays!). If they still had their original Chrisian conotations, they would cease to exist and the Gaia worshippers would rule the day even more so than they do now.



Ok, I have never heard of any children having their Bibles siezed and thrown in the garbage. That was an unneeded exaggeration. One thing I hate when people use obvious
exaggerations to support their argument.

The First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

To me, this says that people can practice their religion on public property but the government can't get involved in it. So although you have the right to pray to the god of the your choice while on school property, School officals can't lead a prayer or have an offical school prayer. Which means reading the Bible on your own free time, say at lunch is perfectly O.K.

About the "In God We Trust" on our money and "One Nation Under God" in our pledge. Tell me, would the Government be allowed to change the words to "In God We Do Not
Trust", and "One Nation Not Under God"? If the Government can't print on our money "In God We Do Not Trust", why can the Goverment print on our money "In God We Trust"? By allowing "In God We Trust" and disallowing "In God We Do Not Trust" The Government is imho, establishing a religous belief. Which is outlawed by the 1st Amendment.
Same goes for the pledge.

One last thing, alot of people say the 1st Amendment only gives freedom of religion and not freedom from religion. I ask, how can you have true freedom of religion without having freedom from religion?

btw: I am not an Athiest, I am a Protestant. Although I'm sure some of my beliefs go against my Church's beliefs.