- Post
- #392292
- Topic
- Pat Robertson does it again
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/392292/action/topic#392292
- Time
oh good god

I truly can't stand Pat Roberson. He gives Christians a bad name.
This user has been banned.
oh good god

I truly can't stand Pat Roberson. He gives Christians a bad name.
nooooooooooooooooooooooo!
and would we have played well enough to get selected to those 12 All-Star games without the juice? we will never know. That is why he shouldn't go to the hall. He cheated and his whole career is tainted. I don't care that they were all doing it. If they truly all were doing it, then no one from that era of baseball deserves to get in.
Why is it cheating doesn't get you a lifetime ban, but gambling does?
double post, sorry.
hmm, yes. Jim Carrey would be a intriguing choice for Murdoch. Now, I truly hope they do to Face what they did to Dirk Benedict's other character.
exactly. They may not automatically make you hit homers, but it they can help.
I'm also not sure how then can find someone to replace Mr. T as BA, and I'm concerned as well about Howling Mad Murdock. I would think it would be very difficult to fill Dwight Schultz's shoes.
of course the juice helped him. It made him stronger. I guarantee you some of those home runs would have been pop up flies if not for the juice.
I wonder if it will contain alot of scenes where alot of bullets get fired, but no one gets hit?
while watching #1 square off against #16 in the first college division 1A playoff game? very doubtful.
mark my words:
College football will decide to have playoffs, Lucas will release the fully restored OOT on blu-ray with picture and sound equal to the SE, I will find a girlfriend, pigs will fly, and hell will freeze all before Palin wins the White House.
I don't discount history at all. History is a favorite subject of mine. Like I said, I don't doubt that a true Conservative could win someday, just not as soon as 2012 and certainly not Palin(too many people have her pegged as a dope and a quitter). In any case, we'll just have to wait and see what happens then .
I think everyone who has proven to have taken Steroids should never get into the hall of fame. They're cheaters pure and simple. I also think their records should be stricken off the books, or have asterisks.
I know he had a speech and yes, he is seen by the Navi as A leader, I don't recall them making him THE leader(as in head of the Navi). As for the dragon stuff, keep in mind that taming that dragon was a BIG deal to the Navi.
ferris209 said:
Nanner Split said:
ferris209 said:
Warbler said:
ferris209 said:I happen to think that Palin is exactly what America needs right now, a real person who wasn't brought up in a rich family or subjected to years of ------><span style="text-decoration: underline;">ELITE</span><------ college instruction.
you're not saying there's something wrong with candidate having a College Education are you. Imo, there would be something wrong with a candidate not having a college education.
I've done a little work on te sentence to hopefully help you along with that one.
I've seen that word/phrase thrown around a lot, and I have to ask, what on earth does that even mean? What's the difference between a regular college education and an ELITE!!!!11!1!1one!!1! college education? Is that a separate box you have to check on your application?
Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Harvard, Pennsylvania, Princeton, and Yale.
It's not that I necessarily have anything against those who go to those schools, but they seem to have an issue with the likes of me. They seem to think that someone who attended a community college is inferior or under their level. Most everyone in Washington graduated from one of the above Colleges. Those folks are also referred to as "Ivy League".
ferris209 said:
if they run what you believe to be a true Conservative, Obama would have won in even more of a landslide.
I disagree, if the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1980">past</a> tells us anything, the people of the United States elect <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan">true conservatives</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1980#Results">landslides</a>.
ferris209 said:
I did that as to draw attention that they are portrayed as villans. Besides, <a href="http://marinecorpstimes.com/news/2010/01/marine_avatar_010810w/">I'm not the only one who got idea</a>. The Marines seem to feel the same.
ferris209 said:
Whatever, but to me when 40% of the United States identify themselves as Conservative and just 36% call themselves Moderate and a scant 21% are liberal, then Conservatives are the plurality. I am using majority loosely since they do outnumber the Moderates alone and Liberals alone. All a decent Conservative would have to do is siphon 11% of the Moderate vote in the next election and Obama will hopefully be sent packing. However, by that time, even a half assed Conservative should get 65% of the vote when the people see what a disaster Obama has been.
hello, kevin. Welcome to the forum :)
xhonzi said:
Having seen the movie this morning... he's flat out lying. There are parts of this movie that are so oriented as to specifically evoke political controversy surrounding President George W. Bush and the current conflict in Middle East.
hmm, I see as much reference to Bush as I did to our handling of the Native Americans.
ferris209 said:
I disagree, I think the Republican Party has rejected its Conservative foundation. The Republicans tried to run a "liberal light" candidate last election and it failed.
if they run what you believe to be a true Conservative, Obama would have won in even more of a landslide.
ferris209 said:I happen to think that Palin is exactly what America needs right now, a real person who wasn't brought up in a rich family or subjected to years of eilite college instruction.
you're not saying there's something wrong with candidate having a College Education are you. Imo, there would be something wrong with a candidate not having a college education.
ferris209 said:
I don't necessarily dislike Avatar just because of the politics, but they do help me to hate it. I do not like that they portray the "villainous" army to be "Marines" who happen to dress, look, and act like our U.S. Marine Corp. Put on top of it that it is pretty much "Dances in Wolves in Space".
they were supposed to be military force how would how have them look?
also the way you put quotes around the word villainous, do you mean imply that they weren't the villain?
ferris209 said:
Despite the fact that conservatives are the clear majority in the United States
we had the discussion in "another realm" disagreed with this then, and I disagree with it now. Back then the statistics you quoted said the Conservatives were not in the majority. They showed there were more non-conservatives than conservatives.
I saw Avatar and 3D last night. I have to say I really liked it. Some of the scenery was absolutely beautiful to me. The 3D was very neat. Clearly the story is referencing our treatment of the Native Americans. Never having seen Pocahontas, I can't say how similar they are. I can say I really enjoyed the movie and was thoroughly entertained for two hours. I give it two thumbs up.
Ric Olie said:
Dear Warbler,
No, I wouldn't do that. I'd consider something more appropriate, like pancakes.
Sincerely,
hot.like.olie
I give up.
but I didn't ask that. I didn't ask anything.
