logo Sign In

Tyrphanax

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Nov-2010
Last activity
14-May-2024
Posts
6,821

Post History

Post
#608153
Topic
Michael Arndt heavily involved in writing the new SW trilogy
Time

xhonzi said:

Bingowings said:

If there is a sharp disconnect to appeal to one group it will be as divisive as what George did with the SE and the PT.

I don't think so.

The ways that the OT already doesn't jive with the PT are more likely to continue than not.

What I mean is, Luke isn't asked to become Obi-Wan's padiwan, so Luke has never heard that term, so he isn't likely to use it.  Why would he?*

Luke was not instructed to grow a rat tail upon starting his journey to become a Jedi knight, so how would he know of that tradition?  Why would he start it again?*

Luke's never heard of midichlorians.*

Luke's never heard of the Jedi Council.*

Luke's never seen two jedi break-dance-fight.*

No one in the OT mentions that stormtroopers were/are clones.*

No one mentions Naboo, Mustachefar, or the Genesis Planet.*

No one mentions the rule of two.*

No one told Luke that Jedi can't get married.*

No one told Luke that the prequels sucked.*

Why would any of that come up in the SWST?

 

*yet

 

Obviously in his quest to rebuild the Jedi Order, he would find vast repositories of this information that was once being hidden by the now-defunct Empire.

Post
#607932
Topic
Are you interested in people?
Time

I'm not sure I'm totally interested in people, per se...

First, a little lot of background.

I was homeschooled, and this, inevitably led to my social life consisting of my younger brother, my dog, my parents, and their adult friends almost exclusively.

Spending so much time around adults meant that I matured (in a sense) faster than most people, which meant that I didn't sometimes connect with kids my age (music tastes were different, wanted to do different things, wasn't all that rambunctious and whatnot). I did have a few friends my age due to a homeschooling group, but they came and went, and I don't know any of the kids I met anymore.

Once my parents forced me into junior college at 17, I met a few people in my classes, and eventually met someone who pulled me into the big group of "the popular kids" (because junior college is really just an extension of high school) and I had more friends than I knew what to do with, I met girls and had girlfriends and normalized socially. Eventually, the group began to fragment, as all large groups do, and I ended up with a core group of really good friends, who I remain close to today.

Going to real college since 21 has been interesting, because the atmosphere here is entirely different, and more productive, than junior college, and the people are generally more "adult" and are intelligent and doing their own thing and living life, which is refreshing. I wouldn't trade my junior college experience for anything, but it's nice to be around grownups. Making friends has been a little slower because it's still a fairly new situation, but it's picking up.

As for how my early schooling situation defined me, I don't think it had a big negative effect or that it stunted me socially, in fact, I feel lucky, because I have never been bad with people; I feel like I was born talented in my personal interactions, and can always make conversation in any situation. I can certainly understand that people could have the same experience and be completely socially destroyed because of it; as good as I am with people, I'm certainly no big extrovert and can be shy to first interact with people initially (after initial contact, though, it's easy). I find the best cure for my tendencies towards introversion are forcing myself to socialize and participate in conversations and meet people (being part of clubs and whatnot at school help a lot in this regard).

At the same time, though, I don't really need people around me so much. Because I grew up so used to making my own fun most of the time, I find that I don't need (or want) to be surrounded by people very often. I do get lonely sometimes (especially when I'm stuck on this campus as I don't have a car and most of the people I know take the shuttle here from another campus), but generally that's related to a lack of female company. This can be a boon (in that I can be fairly autonomous and not need personal interaction all the time), but it has drawbacks (in that, if I don't remind myself to do it, it can be hard to maintain relationships with people because I just don't even think about it, honestly).

So, to this end, I'm not sure if I'm interested in people for more than selfish reasons; I don't think I've ever talked to someone just to be talking to someone because they seemed interesting... but at the same time, I've never turned down a conversation from someone I knew I'd never talk to again. This isn't to say that I'm cold or uncaring, because a truly am interested in my friends and their well-being and life and interests; as separate people and not how they benefit me. But I don't generally go out of my way to talk to people just to be talking to someone.

This is interesting, I'll have to analyze my interactions with people more over the next week so I can see what my motives are.

Post
#607752
Topic
Secession!
Time

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say it shouldn't have happened, because it really solidified the nation (at the expense of the south, but dividing the nation would have ended badly for both sides in the end if it came to that; division would have robbed the United States of its strength [unity and thus control and shared benefit of the natural resources of North America] and resulted in two lesser nations that would have been more easily exploitable by outside nations) and was one of the earlier factors in the rest of the world taking us seriously as a nation.