logo Sign In

Turisu

User Group
Members
Join date
30-Oct-2012
Last activity
17-Dec-2024
Posts
224

Post History

Post
#713298
Topic
Idea: Original dark version of Batman '89?
Time

Ok so, as an experiment, I just fired up the BD on my XBMC setup and used the per-movie settings to turn the brightness down from the default 50% to 46% and it really makes the difference! Blacks are deep and black again instead of grey and murky, some of the visual effects that previously looked extremely dated now look seamless and the 'suiting-up' scene where Batman slowly raises his head is far more impressive as his eyes emerge from darkness rather than just getting a little brighter.

I can't say with any certainty at all that this simple change has returned the film to how it originally looked but it definitely looks far better and reminds me more of how I remember feeling while watching the movie as a kid. I'd love to know how dark the original print actually was and whether only certain scenes were lightened for home video, but until we have a good source then this will do just fine. :)

Post
#713294
Topic
Idea: Original dark version of Batman '89?
Time

borisanddoris said:

http://youtu.be/EyozzozRsCk

like this?

 

Exactly. This is clearly close to the original 35mm source as many of the clips are covered with film dirt. Unfortunately it's a very low-quality transfer so is of very little value as a reference. For interest's sake though:

This scene actually appears as dark, if not darker on the BD:

Trailer


BD


Whereas the shadows in this scene appear to have been lightened for the BD, even accounting for the overall dimness of the trailer source:

Trailer


BD


Then there are shots like these. In this one, it's been speculated that you shouldn't be able to see Jack's face clearly until he steps out of the shadows for the Joker reveal. Though I don't think it was intended to be completely black, I agree that it was probably darker originally:

And in this one where the Batmobile is supposed to be driverless, you can clearly see a driver's hand on the wheel. It's surprising that this goof was missed in post-production so perhaps the original scene was dark enough that the hand wasn't visible:


And then there's just the general sense when watching the BD that many scenes just have a 'greyness' to them and lack of depth due to lightened shadows. Oddly this is not nearly as apparent on my PC monitor as it is on my (calibrated) TV.

Post
#713090
Topic
Idea: Original dark version of Batman '89?
Time

Unfortunately I haven't been able to find any consistency in the brightness changes when comparing various original trailer footage with the BD. Some scenes from the BD actually seem darker than the trailer whereas some look as if they've been lightened significantly. It looks as if no blanket darkening process over the whole movie would do the job well enough and therefore a reference print would be necessary.

Post
#712886
Topic
Idea: Original dark version of Batman '89?
Time

It’s well known that Tim Burton’s 1989 Batman was brightened for home video releases as many cinema viewers found the original prints to be “too dark”. As someone who still remembers the experience of seeing the original none-more-black Batman in the theatre as a kid, I wondered if anybody here with the necessary skills and software would be interested in creating a restoration with darker levels to resemble the original theatrical version.

Now, as far as I’m aware, there are no reference 35mm prints available to the community. But some indication of how dark the movie was originally can be glimpsed from old trailer footage and 35mm stills on ebay. While it may be impossible to recreate the theatrical look 100% faithfully with the materials available, surely any effort to take down the black levels would bring the movie closer to its original look than what we have now.

I’m just throwing the idea out there in case there is any interest.

Post
#710609
Topic
kk650's Star Wars Saga: Regraded and Semi-Specialized (Released)
Time

Isn't that white/green R2 unit seen later being lowered into one of the X-wings before the assault on the Death Star?

I feel that removing him from Tattooine undermines his personal journey somewhat. The least George could have done is replace him with a dinosaur in that scene as well. In fact, replacing all the X-wing droids with dinosaurs would add so much more awesome to the Battle of Yavin!

Post
#709965
Topic
Harmy's THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Despecialized Edition HD - V2.0 - MKV & AVCHD (Released)
Time

Thanks for the screenshots. I have some questions if you don't mind.

In shots 5 & 11 Vader's saber appears pinkish in both the GOUT and the BD, however the v2.0 shot has it much more red. Can I ask what reference you used to establish that a redder saber is more correct here?
In shot 8, the GOUT shows the sabers as being much brighter than in v2.0 to the point where the whites are blooming dramatically at the point where they cross. v2.0 looks closer to the dimmer BD look. Again, was there another reference used here?

Thanks once again. None of the above is meant as criticism, I'm just really interested in your decision-making process when it comes to colour references. :)

Post
#703167
Topic
Harmy's THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Despecialized Edition HD - V2.0 - MKV & AVCHD (Released)
Time

I had actually expected the cloud city interior shots to be a lot more orange, similar to the shots from this bootleg and early LD release.

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Star-Wars-Colortiming-Cinematography-was-What-changes-was-done-to-STAR-WARS-in-93/post/550241/#TopicPost550241

Puggo also mentions that these shots in his 16mm PSB restoration are similarly orange.

Just curious, Harmy; were these sources taken into account when you selected the color grading for these scenes and what made you decide on a color timing closer to the GOUT?

Post
#699758
Topic
The Audio Preservation Thread
Time

PDB said:

That's my fault. I was rushing to upload a new copy and exported the entire session instead of just the LD track. That's what happens when you rush. Thanks to Jonno for pointing that out. I already fixed it, tested it and uploading it now. I will send you a new link boris.

 I'd also very much appreciate a link to the fixed Batman track. Many thanks. :)

Post
#689999
Topic
Info: 'South Park' - episode 201 - Speech Preservation...
Time

Episode 201 was supposed to be censored - that's the joke. The creators may have backtracked on this due to fan backlash but just look at the scene where Tom Cruise is in the machine with Muhammad and draining his power. Muhammad is censored by a black box and, as Tom Cruise absorbs his power, he becomes censored by a black box too! That scene wouldn't make any sense without the censorship.

This myth about the network censoring episode 201 is cute but the joke is on anyone who believes it wasn't intended that way. :p

Post
#680873
Topic
Movies with wrong color grading *** UPDATED ***
Time

TServo2049 said:

And as to how dark the first Batman was, I have a theory. It had to have been dark enough that the Joker reveal actually worked. In every video transfer of the film, when he's standing in the shadows talking to Grissom, you can make out his face (to differing degrees depending on which transfer). But I just can't believe that Burton would have intended this; the original prints had to have had blacks sufficiently deep so as to almost completely hide him in darkness until he steps out into the light and says "You can call me...JOKER!"

That's interesting. I always enjoyed the fact that you could almost see his face but not quite make it out entirely. The way Grissom winces and strains his eyes trying to get a better look at Jack while he's talking as if he can see that something isn't quite right but it's too dark to see what is exactly how I felt watching it. I feel the scene would lose some of it's creepiness if Jack were entirely in silhouette up until the reveal so I'd prefer to think that was intended. It would be interesting to see how the final script describes that scene as the reveal is such a key moment. All I can find online are earlier drafts in which Jack is hiding his face with a muffler.

I agree that the movie should definitely be darker though. I saw the movie in the cinema in 1990 when I was 11 and right from when I got hold of the first-release VHS tape the following year, I thought that it was too light and grey compared to the deep blacks that scared the hell out me the first time I saw it. No home video release has ever reminded me of how I first saw that movie.

Post
#672922
Topic
Info Wanted: 'LOTR - FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING': Green tint removed?
Time

Well that settles The Hobbit for me. If the green tint is theatrically accurate then the BD is perfect as far as I'm concerned. Personally I don't care much about the green tint in FOTR EE since I much prefer the theatrical versions of all the LOTR movies but, as always, I'm glad there are fans out there with the skills and dedication to put these things right for people that want the choice.

That's interesting about movies being delivered on HDDs. I had no idea that's how things were done nowadays. :)