logo Sign In

Tobar

User Group
Moderators
Join date
13-Sep-2006
Last activity
12-Nov-2025
Posts
5,347

Post History

Post
#741956
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

HotRod said:

Hal 9000 said:

HotRod said:

Ady, Makingstarwars.net just ripped into you on their latest podcast. 

 Can you say more? I don't want to have to wade through the episode.

 Go to the 2:08 mark. It starts there

 Sounds like they're bagging on Harmy, making fun of someone for watching Despecialized as their first Star Wars experience. And then they start ripping into Revisited.

These guys are a-holes.

Post
#741499
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

John Carpenter's THE THING (1982)

Still brilliant to this day. Maintains a feeling of suspense throughout the entire running time. Practical effects work was fantastic.

THE THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD (1951)

A classic. The overlapping dialog technique utilized here was revolutionary and helped to usher in more naturalistic conversations in film. Love this film.

THE THING (2011)

A completely bland prequel. The only aspect of it that could have been redeeming, the practical effects, were completely covered up by horribly subpar slapdash CG. A complete waste of story potential.

I will say I appreciated some of the throwback elements from the 1951 film. Though its complete lack of suspense, interesting characters and original Thing variations outweigh the few positive aspects of the film. Perhaps if the studio hadn't been out to sabotage the project from the start we might have ended up with something decent.

Post
#741327
Topic
The new Star Wars comics - a general discussion thread
Time

SilverWook said:

They're going to SE the original comics now? This is as bad as colorizing old movies.

 They kind of hinted at this back in November when they revealed the cover for one of their omnibus volumes that used the original line art from a cover but recolored it:

And I thought the Dark Horse reprints in the 90's had bad coloring.

To be fair, Dark Horse made up for that in the early 2000's when they came out with the A Long Time Ago... anthology reprints. They went to great lengths to try and recreate the comics original coloring. It wasn't absolutely perfect but it was very faithful.

I don't think I'll care for Marvel's new modernized recolorings but at least Dark Horse's compilations are still available for purchase.

Post
#741314
Topic
The new Star Wars comics - a general discussion thread
Time

New York, NY – December 16, 2014 – Next year, the original Marvel Comic adaptations of the iconic Star Wars trilogy return for new, oversized graphic novels with remastered coloring! It all starts this May as the first original comic adaptation of the greatest space-fantasy film of all time is reborn for the modern age as STAR WARS™: EPISODE IV A NEW HOPE makes it’s triumphant return to comic shops!

Weeks before George Lucas’ first STAR WARS film hit theatres, Marvel gave eager fans their very first look at Luke Skywalker, boldly asking “Will he save the galaxy, or destroy it?” Over 30 years later, you know the answer, but that doesn’t spoil the excitement of reliving this now classic adaptation like you’ve never seen it before – including scenes that never made it to the silver screen! Written by Roy Thomas with art by Howard Chaykin, this iconic story has been remastered for the modern age all-new coloring by Chris Sotomayor.

“When Star Wars took the world by storm in 1977, Marvel Comics was right there with exciting comic adaptations and new stories set in a galaxy far, far away,” says Marvel SVP Sales & Marketing David Gabriel. “With new Star Wars comics being published by Marvel in 2015, we’re proud to look back on this exciting remastered adaptation of the original film, with remastered adaptations of The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi coming later in 2015.”

Debuting in an oversized hardcover format with sophisticated packaging and a new cover by famed artist Adi Granov, relive the original Marvel Comics adventure of Luke, Han, Leia, Chewbacca, C-3PO, R2-D2 and the villainous Darth Vader again – or for the very first time. It’s six against an entire galaxy – one that’s far, far away and a long time ago!

May the Force be with you, and in the mighty Marvel manner this May when the remastered STAR WARS™: EPISODE IV A NEW HOPE OGN HC comes to comic shops and bookstores in 2015!

Source

Bleh.

Post
#741152
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

DuracellEnergizer said:

The Jewel of the Nile (1985)

It certainly is funny what tricks the mind can play on you. When I watched this movie back as a kid, I distinctly remember there being a literal jewel in it -- a large, fist-sized ruby. Yet watching it again last night, there wasn't a literal fist-sized jewel -- ruby or otherwise -- in it at all. The closest the film ever gets to one is the jewel-encrusted dagger the Sufis give to DeVito's character at the end.

 You're probably confusing it with the first film in the series, Romancing the Stone, which did have a large jewel:

Post
#741076
Topic
Guardians of the Galaxy discussion thread
Time

canofhumdingers said:

This thread is interesting in that the Godzilla message board I frequent just went through this SAME experience of the Godzilla (2014) 2d vs 3d bluray differences with people being very upset that the 2d version was noticeably darker.

But what a lot of people don't seem to realize is that 3d copies are almost ALWAYS a bit brighter in order to compensate for the fact that 3d glasses have a slight tint to them. You can't compare a raw 3d screenshot to a 2d screenshot. To make the comparison fair, you'd need to send the 3d shot through a filter equivalent to viewing it through the 3d glasses. And I'd be willing to bet that if you do that, they will look awfully similar.

 Yes, yes, to canofhumdingers you listen!

Post
#740995
Topic
Guardians of the Galaxy discussion thread
Time

I just finished a full viewing of the 2D blu-ray. The tint isn't really noticeable at all.

I think the more naturalistic color timing in the 3D version has something to do with making for a more comfortable stereoscopic experience.

The fact that there are differences like that lens flare is a pretty clear sign that we're dealing with two distinct cuts of the film.

As such, I would imagine the 2D color timing is exactly how Gunn wanted the final film and isn't a mistake.