logo Sign In

TheBoost

User Group
Members
Join date
6-Nov-2008
Last activity
9-Oct-2015
Posts
3,988

Post History

Post
#403817
Topic
My Very Minor Upcoming PT Edits
Time

I'm back to work on these. Finished "TPM," which was so minor as to almost not count as an edit at all.

But as I approach AOTC and ROTS there's one more thing I want to do. Eliminate Duel of the Fates. It just feels forced.

It should be easy in AOTC, as it's all by itself and can just be replaced with something better. Any ideas what to use? There's a Duel of the Fats ripoff on the Force Unleashed soundtrack I might try.

As for ROTS, I think it will be beyond my abilities to even attemp to remove that tune from the Yoda/Palpy fight. I'd have to re-foley the entire thing. It'sa pity, because it's just too over the top musically, and the scene is already way over the top.

Post
#403806
Topic
Why Can't We Respect Other Peoples Beliefs?
Time

doubleofive said:

TheBoost said:

 

So you disagree with Rick Warren and his type's specific theology? That doesn't sound very respectful.

You can agree with his theology and not how he spends his church's money, which I do.  Megachurches rub me the wrong way for just what sean is saying.  Golden crosses and waterfalls in the foyer aren't going to help anyone, whether they go to that church or not.

The church I went to in TN was fairly small, but gave over half of their money to missions.  That's how it should be done.  Or like currently I help lead a bible study in someone's home.  No money changes hands at all, we just invite our neighbors over to encourage them.  That's what its about, not vast sanctuaries and video screens.  Relationships.

That what YOUR church is about. But if we're respecting other people, it means we respect what their church is about. In the case of Mega-church theology, their about mass salvations, huge gatherings, hands in the air praising the spirit. They value sheer vollume of praise and salvation.

Coud you respect a religion that charity and relationships are NOT a part of at all? Could you respect a Leprechaunist?

 

 I'm kind of enjoying this thread.  We've managed to be pretty civil to one another.  I'm proud of us. :-D

Well screw you hippy!

Post
#403740
Topic
POLL: How do You Mock Lucas' Name?
Time

vote_for_palpatine said:

 

Yeah, you're right - but it was fun to do it back when we were all complaining about the GOUT. It's like yelling at the furniture after stubbing a toe on it - it's useless and achieves nothing, but it somehow beats not saying anything. I don't know why.

For the record, I've never been a Lucas basher. Not on a personal level, anyway.

Oh, people can talk all the shit they want about GL till he stops being a douche and releases the real version of the movies.

I just find the name calling kinda dumb.

Post
#403710
Topic
Why Can't We Respect Other Peoples Beliefs?
Time

sean wookie said:

I really have no problem with religion or people if they don't have a problem with me. I just wish instead of those super stadium-like huge churches some of that money should be used to help the poor. I know most churches arent like that but do we really need any of those? I would assume doing good things would get you out of a bad list more than getting church built.

So you disagree with Rick Warren and his type's specific theology? That doesn't sound very respectful.

Post
#403709
Topic
Why Can't We Respect Other Peoples Beliefs?
Time

vote_for_palpatine said:

But speaking only for myself, I don't believe everyone else is wrong; I have no way of knowing one way or the other. I believe what I believe because it makes the most sense to me.

So you're not REALLY 100% sure about your faith? And you can respect other people based on that.

That's not a knock. This topic strikes me where I live because I'm at the same time the world's worst Christian and the world's weakest atheist. What you're saying makes all the sense in the world to me.

But what about the people who really, really, really believe? People who believe with fervor and absolute unquestioning faith. People who don't believe, people who know.

Can they be expected to respect other people religons? If someone truly and absolutely thinks I'm going to hell, or that I'm sadly deluded, or that my particular god is a myth or perhaps a demon, isn't there something dishonest about talking about how they respect that?

Post
#403682
Topic
Why Can't We Respect Other Peoples Beliefs?
Time

 

DoubleoFive said

As a Christian, I appreciate your respect.  I have my beliefs and even went to Bible College, but I'm not going to run around screaming that everyone else is wrong.  I doubt many people have come to believe through picketing, yelling, and being holier-than-thou.  Its all about relationships, not preaching at people.

But you think it, right?

Lets pretend for a moment that I'm a Leprechaunist. I worship Leprechauns. Each morning I wake up and do my devotionals over Lucky Charms, exchange my paycheck to buy gold coins so I may one day have my own pot of gold, and I beleive that anyone who isn't a Leprechanist is going to be tortured for all eternity by the Leprechaun from "Leprechaun in the Hood." I am also raising my children to be devout Leprechaunists, and don't want them to play with non-Leprechaunists or engage in any secular actvities that distract them from chasing the rainbow.

Coud you really 'respect' that? And if I genuinely beleived in that, could I be expected to 'respect' your ridiculous beleifs in science, YHWH, Ganesh, or The Force?

Picture the following:

DEVOUT FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIAN: Hello, I'm a Christian.

GODLESS ATHEIST: Hello, I'm an Atheist.

DFC: Well, I deeply believe that the nature of all creation dictates that you're going to burn in hell for all eternity for denying Christ, but I wont mention it, because I respect your beliefs.

GA: That's great, because I think you're a deluded fool basing your life on bronze-age mythology and 18th century revivalism, and backwards people like you are harmful to progress, but I'll let it slide because I respect your beleifs.

DFC: If I didn't respect you so much I might mention that God allowed 9/11 and Katrina to happen because of people like you. But I'm not here to judge.

GA: It's a good thing I have so much respect, otherwise I'd bring up all the suffering that religion has caused in the whole of human history and now. But I'm no bigot.

HINDU: Hey guys! I think you're both wrong on every single level, and will be reincarnated as worms because of it, but I sure do respect you!

ALL: Go respect! (group high five. curtain)

Are we actually talking about respecting beliefs, or do we mean "let's just ignore it because it's too fundamentally difficult to interact if we don't."

EDIT: I quote DubOh5, but this post isn't meant as a direct coment on his.

Post
#403335
Topic
PT Radio Drama
Time

Listening to the ESB radio drama the other night.

I wish LFL and NPR would team up again and do a PT radio drama series. With a solid writing staff they could expand and improve these stories. Ideally Matthew Stover, who made the Ep. 3 novelization awesome, could be involved.

It's a pity Brian Daly, daddy of the EU and writer of the OT radio dramas passed away.

And as a commuter, there's nothing I'd dig more than three more 12 episode Star Wars adventures to enjoy (except maybe a jet-car).

Post
#403183
Topic
What do you LIKE about the EU?
Time

xhonzi said:

And...?

I believe you've had more than enough time to read it?

 Sheesh. There's a post I'd forgoten about.

Well I did finish the trilogy and liked them less and less as they went.

They made it so that "Han Solo- Dashing Rogue only out for himself" that we meet in Mos Eisly was actually "Han Solo- Idealistic Hero with a Bad Break suffering from Heart Break"

If he was already a hero willing to champion the little guy against the Big Bads, and had just hit a rough patch, it makes him in the movies a lot less compelling.

Post
#403123
Topic
Correct viewing order of ALL official Star Wars related movies / series ?
Time

I'm thinking I'm going to keep the PT away from my kid until he's older. Let him watch the OT and the Clone Wars cartoon. Maybe TPM. The Ewok movies are ok too.

But I'll save AOTC and ROTS until he's older, old enough to hear about the other kids at school. This way he'll have 'real' Star Wars already ingrained into his little mind.

Post
#403119
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

Rogue Leader said:

Anyway, I would be glad to go head to head with you on this and if you're saying Mandalorian back story only goes back 7 years... well... That already tells me how much you know about their background and history. However, to an extent you're correct, their legend springs from some guy in an awesome costume in ESB. However, if you're gonna say that then it's good to keep in mind that everything about the Mandalore is added on anyway and only 7-years recent (which is also false btw), thus why should we care about any of this... Then why should we care about Star Wars at all? Afterall, it's ALL made up as well and added on over the decades anyway. 

But that's the thing... We do care, and to imply that we shouldn't as much or at all because the simplicity of it's origin misses the point entirely. Why even be interested in Star Wars at all then? That's for the individual person to answer for themselves as I have my own reasons as I'm sure we all do.... However, my point was that Lucas doesn't know what the hell he's doing with his "toy box" anymore and thus creates situations and issues that are contradictory to things that were established previously. Yes, it's made up, it's ALL made up... Yet, I care cos it's a interesting story and all I really wish is that the consistency and quality of the universe is cared for at the level it should be.

Further more to mock the Mandalore by interjecting your dull Klingon comparison is unwarranted. They're different sci-fi and cultures with some similar ideals but only to an extent. I'd say Mandos would tear those ridge headed freaks a new one and won't act like dirty drunken sailors in a bad pirate movie doing so (but hey, that's me). But to say that they're the same/"hardly ground breaking sci-fi", it's been done etc etc etc... Again, the point is missed. EVERYTHING in Star Wars has been done before, it borrows from everything else and it's a different spin on stuff. It's how it's arranged that presented to us that has drawn a lot of to it as fans and even now.

However, it's the presentation NOW, that I have the most problems with... It's inconsistent, contradictory, and concepts to be done for profit rather than the integrity of the story or characters and so I don't buy those novels and/or games any longer. In fact I haven't bought anything that would profit LFL in a few years at least.

As for those notable authors you mentioned (I personally love Zahn and Stackpole's work...) Yeah? And? Is it wrong for these creative people to make money? I mean it's their living right? What sets them apart from Lucas however is that these authors are hardly the gajillionare power house Lucas is. They've not been corrupted by absolute power and not been surrounding themselves with yes men who are afraid to tell them "Hey, dude... that's like... retarded". Thus there is a certain integrity in their work that is based of struggle and meaning to make us more interested in each character (and expanded new characters, Mara Jade, Corran Horn, the Solo kids... etc) as opposed to the absolute pile of nothing that's in something like Episode 1 which had no meaning or struggle we could be drawn into or care about.

 

 Hmmm... so because Lucas actually runs his own creation "Star Wars" and doesn't hand it off to other people to run for him, and he directed the PT when he would have made just as much money barely even being involved, that proves he doesn't care and is only about money, so he should hand off control to other people. Brilliant.

And the money Lucas (the creator) makes is somehow corrupt and immoral, but the money EU authors make (and you can slap "Star Wars" on the cover of just about anything and make it a best seller) is pure and honorable because they're great artists with integrity.

There's this odd mixing of what-is-liked and what-is-morally-good. When you liked the EU it was apparently not "done for profit" and now that you don't like it as much it is just a big money grab.

You don't like the PT or the CWS so they're just pipelines to line Lucas's evil pockets, but "Battlestar: Clone Medics" and "The Hand of Thrawn" were art for arts sake and worthy of our patronage. I'm sure Lucas, Zahn, and the publishers didn't care at all that "Heir to the Empire" sold more copies than God. They were all about integrity back then. To bad they sold out later.

And perhaps I haven't tracked down the right mid-90s comic back issue, or the right RPG supplement, or Abel Pena's blog, or wookiepedia article that somehow explains how the convuluted ret-con full history of the Mandalorian Space-vikings is so wondeful. I probably should have done extensive research before being bored to tears by Traviss's novels. Shame on me.

I should make me a flowchart of how Boba Fett was Jaster Mereel but wans't and how being a Mandalorian is a race, and a concept, and a clothing style, and how Flynn Shyssha in the old Marvel comics made perfect sense until big Evil Lucas came aong  and ruined the flawless continuity.

OR I can roll that the EU is a muddled mess and always has been and parts of it are just as bad or worse than the PTs lowest moments (Crytals Star, Glove of Vader, Swarm War), and not dwell on these inconsistencies as I enjoy the product the creator of Star Wars is actually delivering to me on TV.

 

Post
#403098
Topic
Facebook ruins meaningless social interactions
Time

Anchorhead said:

Recently, however, a board I've been part of for about 7 years announced they'll be shutting down, so we decided to use FaceBook to keep in touch and created a group. It's been strange having to get accustomed to using real names. Imagine that - actual names.

 Wait... are you trying to say that Anchor Head isn't your real name? No wonder I couldn't find you in the phonebook!

Post
#402750
Topic
Facebook ruins meaningless social interactions
Time

In the last week I've bumped into three people I knew in high school (Class of 98).

These were friendly acquaintances, the sort of people you smile at, pleasantly exchange a handful of biographical info (you married who? you had a kid? you moved away and are now back?), say farewell and mention to your pals "I bumped into such-and-such yesterday."

"Facebook" has ruined these meetings.

I don't use Facebook much. I have an account I check maybe monthly, with two pictures of me. My wife does it a bit moree, with a picture of our baby as her picture.

Now, I bump into these people, and via Facebook they already know the simple biographical info we might exchange (and I assume they think I know theirs). Consequently we have nothing to say. If I had anything of more depth I wanted to tell them we'd be actual friends. 

Post
#402745
Topic
The Prequel Radical Redux Ideas Thread
Time

Rogue Leader said:

Anything he writes is freaking SW gold and I'm so glad he bitched slapped Kevin J Anderson in the Hand of Thrawn duology about Mara Jade and Luke (since KJA's Lando romance angle was total crap)... Totally worth reading Silvery Key, along with the Thrawn Trilogy (genius and totally engaging), Hand of Thrawn Duology (if you wanna know what happens to the Empire at it's finale and how Luke and Mara Jade finally get together, these are the books!), and Outbound Flight (bridges elegantly the PT and the future EU nicely... Sets the stage for future occurrences within the SW timeline) .

Do not get me started on the "Mandalore" in the CWS. First off they are the "Death Watch" they are a splinter group of the Mandalore and the armor is suppose to be very different and thus THEY ARE NOT MANDALORE... That "darksaber" thing was a joke as well. Then... the actual Mandalorians from Mandalore being "pacifist"??? Way to ruin the Mandalorian Super Commandos GL... This is a race of warriors, born to fight and die for their code of conduct and honor who offer their services to the highest bidder and never break their word as such. They respect strength and the will to use it to fight for their vode (brothers/sisters), their goals, and their kote (glory).

If you're gonna have them go "pacifist" or whatever for another convoluted plot line then congrats LFL, you have just neutered one of the greatest warrior groups in sci-fi history... . I really do wish GL would turn over SW to someone who actually does care and KNOWS the universe. He just doesn't care. Everything now is all about setting up product pipelines and getting $ from them... Sick of it.

I don't hate Zahn's books, but I like my SW more about the movie characters, not just having them around to observe and comment Dr. Watson style about how awesome Zahn's new characters are. (Luke: "Gee Mara, thanks for killing C'Boath and clone-Luuuke for me. I sure hope someone takes care of Thrawn for us!")

As for the Mandalorians... I found those books dull as dirt, and as background characters in the KOTOR games the Mandalorians were adequate, but hardly memorable.

"We're a race of badass warriors. Our culture is war! But honorable... don't forget that. k'blah!" is hardly groundbreaking sci-fi. I didn't mind a different take on them on the "Clone Wars" show. I don't mind if it was faithful to the extensive linguistics Karen Traviss made up or not.

Remember, every single thing about the Mandalorians is because a dude in ESB had a cool costume. They're a tangential back-story to a background character.  The entire "Mandalorian" concept reaches back... 7 years out of the 33 year history of the franchise? 

I think it's an interesting POV to say LUCAS is the one all about money, when Zahn, Stackpole, Anderson, Traviss, and what not all became best-sellers writing in another creators toybox.

Post
#402743
Topic
"clone wars"=PT for me
Time

skyjedi2005 said:

The roger roger robots and Jar Jar pretty much made me turn it off during season 1.  I tried season 2 but the palpatine machinations and the dumb cad bane boba fett ripoff was really lame.

Totally childish cartoon made for children.

Cad Bane a rip off Boba Fett?

Bane... talked, had an evil team, kicked lots of ass.

Boba... not so much talky, worked alone, snuck around and dies in his only fight.


I just don't see it.