The Starkiller

User Group: Members
Join date: 18-Jul-2005
Last activity: 10-May-2009
Posts: 81

Post History

Post: #264054
Topic: STAR WARS: the alt.binaries.starwars thread
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/264054/action/topic#264054
Time: 4-Jan-2007 7:14 PM

This is probably only of interest to a select few, but if anyone is interested, a 1982 CED "rip" has been posted.

Post: #264048
Topic: Info Wanted: Question about 1980 uncut Empire
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/264048/action/topic#264048
Time: 4-Jan-2007 6:59 PM

What I find increasingly frustrating about these claims is that the person making the claim will never admit even the possibility of being wrong. Therefore, trying to reason with them becomes pointless. They only seek validation, not the truth.

70mm prints were different from 35mm prints. I thought this was common knowledge by now. But the differences were relatively minor, nothing like what has been described in this thread. There were some different wipes, a different shot/cut in the bacta scene, the establishing shot of the rebel fleet at the end, the holographic Emperor doesn't fade in, and some other things that I forget. The list can be found in the Film Score Monthly magazine that is being discussed. 70mm versions had a completely different sound mix as well, which mostly appears in the Special Edition. Many of the sound mix differences are also heard in the 1980 "Adventures of Luke Skywalker: Star Wars/The Empire Strikes Back" album.

I saw TESB exclusively in 70mm during its original theatrical run. It contained none of the grandiose claims in this thread. I didn't even see the 35mm version until it came out on home video.

The truth is memories are often deceptive. To this day, I have a memory of seeing an AT-ST step on an Ewok in ROTJ. Does that mean it happened? No, and I can admit that my memory is wrong.

Originally posted by: Laserman
So it was either in an early version, or was in a trailer or something somewhere, but I still haven't found it, or even another mention of it *anywhere*.

Laserman, the "So's life" dialog exchange between Han and Luke is in the novelization. That doesn't necessarily have to mean that you read the novel; however, you could have been influenced by someone who had, perhaps unintentionally or unknowingly.

Post: #257620
Topic: Pre-ANH bootleg telecine - a widescreen version (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/257620/action/topic#257620
Time: 20-Nov-2006 8:54 AM

I've heard about a widescreen bootleg but I was never able to actually find one. I'm looking forward to seeing this. The sample doesn't look bad at all!

Thanks, Moth3r!

Post: #256398
Topic: The Star Wars Original Trilogy on RCA's CED Format
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/256398/action/topic#256398
Time: 12-Nov-2006 1:33 AM

The Star Wars CED is identical to the 1982 and 1983 laserdiscs--which differ only in panning and scanning to the VHS and subsequent laserdisc counterparts. There is no missing or additional footage. Claims such as Luke throwing the grappling hook twice are nothing but myths with absolutely no validity.

Post: #256397
Topic: .:. MoveAlong's - The Story of TESB/The Adventures of Luke Skywalker .:. Complete!
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/256397/action/topic#256397
Time: 12-Nov-2006 1:13 AM

Good to see this project progressing, MoveAlong. Your SOSW is one of my favorite fan-made DVD projects to date, so I'm really looking forward to this one.

Are you going to stick with the "Story of The Empire Strikes Back" title? When the album was originally released in 1980, it was titled "The Adventures of Luke Skywalker Star Wars/The Empire Strikes Back." It was re-titled as "The Story of The Empire Strikes Back" when it was rereleased in 1983--for conformity's sake I assume. I think using the original title would be more in line with the theme of these projects, but that's just my opinion. What do you think?

Post: #254729
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/254729/action/topic#254729
Time: 3-Nov-2006 6:36 PM

Originally posted by: notbond007
That's weird. I thought that I included the covers. I'll have to check the torrent when I get home from work.

They may be in the RARs. I didn't think about that.

Post: #254585
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/254585/action/topic#254585
Time: 2-Nov-2006 9:05 PM

I included artwork with the original uploads, but I don't see it with the torrent. If anyone needs it, it can be found here.

Post: #254396
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/254396/action/topic#254396
Time: 1-Nov-2006 8:26 PM

Originally posted by: notbond007
ATTENTION: The single layer version is currently being seeded on ILoveTorrents.com and also on DIDIDAVE.com by yours truly. Enjoy!!!
Thanks for providing a torrent! I hope everyone enjoys the DVD.

Originally posted by: Rikter
reminds me of being 12 and rocking out on my PK Ripper!!!!

PK Ripper--that's awesome. I had one of those in my arsenal back in the day!

Post: #250088
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/250088/action/topic#250088
Time: 6-Oct-2006 7:33 PM

The single layer version has been posted to a.b.dvdr and is showing complete on Astraweb. (Astraweb is a news server--like Giganews, Easynews, etc.)

Anyway, if anyone wants to torrent either version, it's fine with me.

Post: #249440
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/249440/action/topic#249440
Time: 4-Oct-2006 4:51 AM

All parts are up and showing complete on Astraweb. If anyone needs an NZB, just PM me.

The single layer version is finished and will start posting tomorrow. I've decided to post it to a.b.dvdr since it's a much smaller group.

Post: #248964
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/248964/action/topic#248964
Time: 1-Oct-2006 7:43 PM

Originally posted by: abamfici
Oh really? And here I am on newegg trying to find a DL burner for no other reason than to put Rad on it (although I'm sure it'll serve me well in the future). How much would it hurt the qualtity and how long do you think it would take?

I guess that's a good reason to upgrade!

At the time I started, I did have a DL burner, or at least access to one. But I don't at this time. The SL version will not take long at all. I already have a SL sized MPEG2 file ready to import into DVD-Lab Pro. I'll just throw some static menus on there and be done with it. I should be able to get it posted soon after the DL is finished. As for quality, I think the difference will be negligible, at least on my low end TV. There may be a difference on a higher end monitor though.

Post: #248951
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/248951/action/topic#248951
Time: 1-Oct-2006 6:59 PM

Yes, it's finally complete and currently being posted to a.b.dvd. However, at 6.2 GB including PAR2's it's going to take 2 or 3 days with my modest upload speed. I'll let everyone know when it's finished and provide an NZB at that point.

I've also decided to go ahead with a single layer version--mainly because I don't have a DL burner.

If there is interest in that, it will get posted as well.

Post: #248264
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/248264/action/topic#248264
Time: 27-Sep-2006 6:09 AM

The Dirt Bike Kid--wasn't Ralphie in that? I think I saw that once.

Anyway, my Rad DVD hasn't been posted yet. I should start posting it by this weekend. I will let everyone know.

By the way, I've responded to all PM's, but I think some people may not have their PM's turned on.

Post: #242725
Topic: 70mm mix to ’93 mix comparison (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/242725/action/topic#242725
Time: 10-Sep-2006 5:59 PM

Nice job on this, Belbucus. It's very interesting. And very timely as well with the "original unaltered" DVD coming next week--which will include the '93 mix.

Post: #240526
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/240526/action/topic#240526
Time: 1-Sep-2006 8:05 PM

Thanks for the kind words, guys.

Originally posted by: mk1277
I have a question to all - what's the best app and news server to pull this down? I'm hoping that someone seeds as a torrent, but just in case that doesn't happen I'd like to know if there are any tricks with the newsgroups. I've never personally had too much luck with free servers, etc. before.

Thanks.
There are several apps to choose from and it really comes down to personal choice. I use Xnews myself; Grabit and Agent are popular too. There are numerous servers out there. I find the best deal is with Astraweb. Anyway, my buddy Russs15 has some great tips here and here.

I'm not going to torrent it myself, but if someone else wants to that's fine.

Originally posted by: radchris
Intersting how the LD version looks so close to VHS quality. I guess those old LDs weren't as great as I thought they were. I always assumed LDs were nere DVD quality.

Yes, the quality of the Rad laserdisc is really not that great. I am really excited to have the new HD source. By the way radchris, I believe you need to turn on your Private Messages in your profile. I think they are off by default.

Post: #240307
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/240307/action/topic#240307
Time: 1-Sep-2006 4:38 AM

Oh yeah, the DVD cover:

http://starkiller72.googlepages.com/rad_cover_3d.jpg

Post: #240305
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/240305/action/topic#240305
Time: 1-Sep-2006 4:36 AM

radchris - I PM'd you back. I'm not sure if you got it.

Anyway, regarding availability, it will be posted to the newsgroups when completed. Probably alt.binaries.dvd. From there it's on its own.

If anyone is interested, here is a small (8MB) DivX of the main menu.

And here are some comparison shots between my original laserdisc sourced DVD and the new HD sourced DVD. As you can see there is no comparison.

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/9237/radhddvd1rp8.th.jpg

Full size

http://img366.imageshack.us/img366/4585/radld1su0.th.jpg

Full size

http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/1818/radhddvd2ve7.th.jpg

Full size

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/2606/radld2hs9.th.jpg

Full size

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/3597/radhddvd3cr3.th.jpg

Full size

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/1626/radld3fi9.th.jpg

Full size

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2953/radhddvd6se4.th.jpg

Full size

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3589/radld6rq6.th.jpg

Full size

Post: #239928
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/239928/action/topic#239928
Time: 31-Aug-2006 7:05 AM

I'm almost finished with the new DVD using the HD file as the source. It will be dual layer to preserve the best possible quality, anamorphic widescreen with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound. I may do a bare bones single layer version as well, I haven't decided.

Here are some sample menu shots. The menus are full motion with audio.

http://starkiller72.googlepages.com/mainmenu.jpg

http://starkiller72.googlepages.com/chapmenu.jpg

Post: #236752
Topic: .:. MoveAlong's - The Story of Star Wars .:. Complete!
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/236752/action/topic#236752
Time: 19-Aug-2006 2:18 AM

Assuming you have DVD Decypter installed, all you need to do is right click the .img file and choose "Burn using DVD Decrypter."

Post: #235298
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/235298/action/topic#235298
Time: 15-Aug-2006 4:32 AM

The HD version looks fantastic. Unfortunately, there is an INHD² watermark on the image. But even worse, it has been cropped to 16:9 and a lot of image has been lost at the top and bottom. Nevertheless, it is leaps and bounds better than my laserdisc.

HD:

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/4384/radhd7gj8.jpg

Laserdisc:

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/5475/radld7sn4.jpg

Post: #234833
Topic: Rad (1986) (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/234833/action/topic#234833
Time: 13-Aug-2006 6:22 PM

Thanks for the heads up, mrwhitethc! I grabbed it last night and will check it out later. I had just about given up on finding an HD cap.

Post: #231210
Topic: Info: DC & Faces - Original audio sources (lots of information)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/231210/action/topic#231210
Time: 1-Aug-2006 4:53 AM

Originally posted by: Belbucus
I still submit that the 70mm and 35mm mixes are distinctly different in many ways including content. There ARE elements in the 6-track that do not exist in the Dolby Stereo version so I assume were not in the original 4-track either. I can only suppose that additional SFX were added during the 70mm dubbing session.

I've given the 70mm recordings a couple of listens and I did not hear any real differences. Can you elaborate as to what you have found? I'd be very interested to know.

Post: #231204
Topic: STAR WARS: the alt.binaries.starwars thread
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/231204/action/topic#231204
Time: 1-Aug-2006 4:28 AM

Originally posted by: dark_jedi
just curious if there is a tutorial or something on how to upload to the newsgroups?
I got downloading down,I cant believe you can DL a full SL dvd in 1-2 hrs,SOOOO much faster than torrenting,and i know how to verify and repair using QuikPar,very nice program I might add.
thanks for the help
DJ

Powerpost is fairly simple. This appears to be a good tutorial.

Post: #231202
Topic: 1977 70mm Soundtrack Strikes Back (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/231202/action/topic#231202
Time: 1-Aug-2006 4:09 AM

David, I think the redo sounds great. Good job.

Blitter, I would love to hear another 70mm recording. Hopefully someone can help you out with it.

Post: #231188
Topic: The "original crawl" on the new DVD is NOT the original crawl! Screenshot inside!
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/231188/action/topic#231188
Time: 1-Aug-2006 3:00 AM

Something that may be of interest in all of this is that the same starfield was used for the crawl on all three films. Of course, this excludes the original pre-Episode IV starfield, which is clearly different.

I'm with the general consensus that the starfield was changed when 'Episode IV' was added. I believe that when they created the new crawl, they used the starfield they had just done for The Empire Strikes Back, which was subsequently used again for Return of the Jedi. All of this makes the original crawl that much more unique.