- Post
- #391261
- Topic
- AVATAR and 3D in general....
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/391261/action/topic#391261
- Time
Eh...never mind. My New Year's Resolution is to stop wasting so much time.
This user has been banned.
Eh...never mind. My New Year's Resolution is to stop wasting so much time.
Excellent post xhonzi, much more eloquent than I could ever hope to put it.
Except for that bit about me and Ric. That sounds off to me.
TV's Frink said:
bkev said:
Tantavive
Who's a what now?
I was going to link to a Tantavive but all I found on Google was a woman named Tanta Vive who died not that long ago. It didn't seem right to link to that. Anyhoo...
bkev said:
Tantavive
Who's a what now?
vaderios said:
I want a step by step guide.
I want Sienna Miller.
-Angel
Selling mockups for sex might be against forum rules.
xhonzi said:
I just hate Mac commercials... so much misinformation.
I know. Those two guys totally say they are computers, but I'm on to them. They're people! People!!!!!!!
Cool. Thanks.
xhonzi said:
or 3 hours. Unless you meant to say that only the first 2 hours are entertaining. Or perhaps the final 2 hours.
eh
Anyways, here's another article dicussing Avatar and Conservatives. Very intertesting...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/11/usc-professor-creates-alien-language-for-avatar.html?cid=6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a6c873f0970b
How was that about conservatives? Were you looking at this one?
I understand why we are not allowed to delete our own posts. It can make a horrible mess of a thread if some goes on a rampage. But have you considered allowing a user to delete their own post as long as no one has posted after it? This would clean up all those "sorry, double post" entries.
Oops. I'm going to suggest to Jay a way that these "accidental double posts" can be deleted by the poster.
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Self-deleting-of-most-current-post/topic/11103/
Vaderisnothayden said:
ferris209 said:
But my whole point is VINH is that Nanner does that to EVERYONE!! He's posted various pictures in response to my rants. If he hadn't done that to you, at some point, then you'd certainly be the exception. I think you read way too much into the smallest things and take then too personal.
Well, there's posting pictures and there's posting pictures. This one was especially mocking.
My god. He called you a baby. Big deal. By going on and on about it, you're just confirming the picture.
I'm starting to feel sorry for you. Seriously. Something tells me you've been picked on your whole life.
Vaderisnothayden said:
doubleofive said:
I was telling my wife about SkyJedi and VINH, and how they always seem to bring a thread around to the prequels sucking, even if its a thread that's not even about movies.
We don't. We do it sometimes, hardly "always". And what's wrong with mentioning one of the most significant truths of Star Wars on a Star Wars board I don't know.
My respect for skyjedi has really grown in the last few weeks. It's interesting to compare his attitude to VINH's.
For those who missed it the first time around, jedi93 (a very familiar figure in a zigfried/ingosucks kind of way) had his clone wars thread bumped by fishmanlee. If you're an off-topic person who stays out of star wars fan edit threads, you might want to give it a read, as it goes extremely off-topic starting around the end of the second page.
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/STAR-WARS-EPISODE-III-THE-CLONE-WARS-RECLONED-EDITION/topic/10880/
Warbler said:
the thing I don't understand is why Vick gets to play again, but Pete Rose is gone for life. Is gambling worse than torturing and murdering dogs?
Agree with that. Actually, wasn't Vick gambling also? Granted, not on his own sport, but I would have preferred that.
Vaderisnothayden said:
You replaced my post text with a cartoon pic of a childlike rabbit wiping away tears while going "Bawww!" The implication being that that was what my posts amounted to and, more particularly, that that was what I amounted to, which was unprovoked personal insult.
You are very sensitive. And not in a "sensitive guy gets the hot chick at the end of the lame comedy" way.
When did this become a "VINH Responds to Those Who He Is Ignoring" thread anyway? I liked it better when it was the "Who is Ignoring You?" thread, which to be fair, is also way off-topic. But I still liked it better that way.
Incidentally, I don't understand putting people on ignore and then still responding to them. I don't actually get putting anyone on ignore in the first place, but why bother if you're going to read what they say anyway?
Why am I not on your ignore list? I'm still confused about that.
EDIT: I get i now. TVF FTW!
ferris209 said:
TV's Frink said:
Link appears broken...
Fixed! Dunno what happened.
It looked like it was linking to a non-exisitant OT.com thread. Works now, thanks.
I still haven't seen Avatar, but pro or con, you gotta admit that "Unobtanium" is one of the dumbest names for something ever.
Link appears broken...
vote_for_palpatine said:
"So I supppose by that logic that Jabba the Hutt must be Han Solo's father."
Thanks for ruining it for those of us here who haven't seen the movie yet :-(
It's funny how far this thread has drifted away from Avatar and the Politics thread has drifted away from politics. I blame myself, of course.
Moth3r said:
Assume the site you are talking about is fanedit.info (it's OK, you can mention it) then check their FAQ:
what do I do if a link is not working or somethign (sic) else is wrong?
write a REPORT about it .
From faneditforum.com
The link for Adywan's ANH Revisited PAL DL DVD points to a PAL SL DVD. This has been mentioned a few times on a Star Wars website of our acquaintance...
Response - corrected. also added corrected torrent links
There is also an unconfirmed report that one of the PAL links contains NTSC files...
Response - ...uploaded this to RS.....its 100% PAL
I was messing around with my Star Trek Wrath of Kahn and I discovered bookmarks. It worked even after taking out the disc. Very nice.
ferris209 said:
TV's Frink said:
ferris209 said:
Put on top of all that, I simply like her approach, I like that she pisses off liberals so badly, that tells me they feel threatened by her. If she was so "ignorant" and "without merit" then they would ignore her, like they do Ron Paul.
Democrats I know actually love Reagan, because they think he would kill the Republican Party's chances again if he was the 1980 nominee.
Umm, makes sense. Talked it over with my Dad, since I was just a one year old at the time, and he said he'd heard this statement before!!!
1980 was a long time ago. Especially when it comes to media coverage.
Sorceror said:
But my banana is incomplete!
Though, as it was raised...
Hey hey hey, this is a family-friendly website!
Thanks for the help Chewtobacca (and for the offer Ziz)
Wait, this is on RS? Could someone PM me the links?
Also, is there any other SW blu-ray on RS?
Thanks.