- Post
- #230329
- Topic
- SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230329/action/topic#230329
- Time

THX
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 21-Apr-2005
- Last activity
- 11-Dec-2006
- Posts
- 1,263
Post History
- Post
- #230297
- Topic
- SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230297/action/topic#230297
- Time
- Post
- #230289
- Topic
- first viewing of the 2006 OOT dvds
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230289/action/topic#230289
- Time
- Post
- #230079
- Topic
- first viewing of the 2006 OOT dvds
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230079/action/topic#230079
- Time
- Post
- #230078
- Topic
- OOT DVDs - interlaced or progressive?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230078/action/topic#230078
- Time
- Post
- #230077
- Topic
- The "original crawl" on the new DVD is NOT the original crawl! Screenshot inside!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/230077/action/topic#230077
- Time
- Post
- #227897
- Topic
- Superman Returns Discussion - SPOILERS
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227897/action/topic#227897
- Time
- Post
- #227759
- Topic
- $36 pre-order (AR) for all 3 titles...anyone found it cheaper??
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227759/action/topic#227759
- Time
- Post
- #227756
- Topic
- 20 years ago, would anyone believe...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227756/action/topic#227756
- Time
Originally posted by: Mike O
It seems that Lucas has been too busy viewing Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope to actually watch Star Wars, the film which was released in 1977.
It was implied by calling it Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope.
It seems that Lucas has been too busy viewing Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope to actually watch Star Wars, the film which was released in 1977.
Originally posted by: andy_k_250
You forgot Special Edition.
Originally posted by: Gaffer TapeYou forgot Special Edition.

It was implied by calling it Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope.
Um...
- Post
- #227755
- Topic
- Info: DC & Faces - Original audio sources (lots of information)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227755/action/topic#227755
- Time
Originally posted by: belbucus, quoting Dave Schnuelle
The mixes that are on these discs are all redone directly from the furthest back material that we had...
The mixes that are on these discs are all redone directly from the furthest back material that we had...
- Post
- #227357
- Topic
- $36 pre-order (AR) for all 3 titles...anyone found it cheaper??
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227357/action/topic#227357
- Time
Originally posted by: bgx90
Not buying the September release won't send the message that demand for the OOT doesn't exist; it will send the message that fans want a release of the OOT that is a transfered from the restored film sources and treated with the respect it deserves.
Hmm...or perhaps it'll send a message that the Sultan wishes for a bottle of Tokay.Not buying the September release won't send the message that demand for the OOT doesn't exist; it will send the message that fans want a release of the OOT that is a transfered from the restored film sources and treated with the respect it deserves.

- Post
- #227354
- Topic
- Help: looking for... TATOOINE OR BUST
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227354/action/topic#227354
- Time
- Post
- #227301
- Topic
- SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227301/action/topic#227301
- Time
- Post
- #227102
- Topic
- The Emperor & line change in ESB SE 1997
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227102/action/topic#227102
- Time
- Post
- #227096
- Topic
- 20 years ago, would anyone believe...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/227096/action/topic#227096
- Time
Edit: beat me to it.
- Post
- #226897
- Topic
- A Scanner Darkly - First 24 minutes
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226897/action/topic#226897
- Time
Originally posted by: none
THX: Cinematically i'm not sure what issue you forcusing on which was lacking from this presentation. It's not a blade runner-esc future we're talking about. These are basic schlubs on the burbs doing they're thing.
If you read "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep," I think you'll see what I mean. That's not a Bladerunneresque future either, but the film brought out Dick's ideas better than a faithful adaptation would have. Dick's novels usually have many levels, he starts with a small story and then just when you're getting comfortable with it, he steps out into a bigger one. This movie just got stuck at the first level. THX: Cinematically i'm not sure what issue you forcusing on which was lacking from this presentation. It's not a blade runner-esc future we're talking about. These are basic schlubs on the burbs doing they're thing.
- Post
- #226894
- Topic
- The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe: 1979 Animated VS. 2005 Live-Action
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226894/action/topic#226894
- Time
- Post
- #226891
- Topic
- Fox France confirms the French OOT release >NOT< to be anamorphic
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226891/action/topic#226891
- Time
- Post
- #226888
- Topic
- OK, the DVDs are coming...so how bad are they going to look?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226888/action/topic#226888
- Time
Originally posted by: Mike O
...doesn't anamorphic offer a 33% resolution increase regardless? Even on my computer screen the anamorphic picture looks crisper.
That's because your computer has enough resolution to display all that an anamorphic DVD has to offer, unlike the majority of 4:3 CRT sets. The 33% resolution increase is lost when anamorphic discs are displayed on a regular 4:3 TV, sometimes by simply discarding every 4th line (which obviously leads to a less accurate picture). There simply aren't enough lines in the letterboxed area to display the increased resolution on the disc. The exception to this is in sets with a "widescreen" mode like the one Mielr described above, which squeezes the lines closer together in the center of the screen, so you can see all the resolution. However, most sets don't have this feature. The compression artifacts thing was kind of facetious, although anamorphic discs do require more compression. For these reasons, though, most viewers (i.e. those with 4:3 sets without "widescreen" modes) will actually get a better image from a letterboxed disc (especially in the case of a letterboxed master). None of this is intended as an excuse for the September discs, which should be a new anamorphic transfer. ...doesn't anamorphic offer a 33% resolution increase regardless? Even on my computer screen the anamorphic picture looks crisper.
- Post
- #226876
- Topic
- ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226876/action/topic#226876
- Time
- Post
- #226604
- Topic
- The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe: 1979 Animated VS. 2005 Live-Action
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226604/action/topic#226604
- Time
- Post
- #226596
- Topic
- SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226596/action/topic#226596
- Time
- Post
- #226594
- Topic
- A Scanner Darkly - First 24 minutes
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226594/action/topic#226594
- Time
- Post
- #226592
- Topic
- Making our own 35mm preservation--my crazy proposal
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226592/action/topic#226592
- Time
- Post
- #226588
- Topic
- ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/226588/action/topic#226588
- Time
Or boris
