logo Sign In

Superweapon VII

User Group
Members
Join date
30-May-2022
Last activity
29-Jun-2025
Posts
858

Post History

Post
#1529949
Topic
<em><strong>ANDOR</strong></em> - Disney+ Series - A General Discussion Thread
Time

So I bit the bullet and watched Andor. As someone who initially loved Rogue One but found it weaker with each subsequent watch, and as someone who’s been turned off by everything else Disney’s had to offer thus far, I didn’t think I’d ever touch this show, but the continual praise convinced me to take a leap of faith.

I thought the first half of the season was a bit on the boring side, but once the proceedings on the sheep planet were through, I really came to admire the show. Though I love certain EU stories more, this is definitely the best thing to come out of the live-action/television corner of the SW Universe since 1980.

I give it a tentative 9/10. Here’s hoping Season 2 keeps the flow going strong.

Post
#1529948
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

StarkillerAG said:

Spartacus01 said:

a movie so poorly written as AOTC.

Yeah… No.

“Just being around her again is… intoxicating.”
“Attachments… FORbidden.”
“I’m haunted by the kiss that you should never have given me. My heart is beating, hoping that that kiss will not become a scar.”
“Don’t leave. Your presence is soothing.”
And of course, the ultimate example:
“I don’t like sand. It’s coarse and rough and irritating, and it gets everywhere. Not like here. Here everything’s soft… and smooth.”

I’m sorry, but if you can’t see how crappy half the dialogue in AOTC is (especially whenever Anakin’s on screen), you’re delusional. And the extremely subpar directing doesn’t do it any favors either.

I was around sixteen when I first saw AOTC. Even at that age, when I unironically liked lots of subpar crap, I found Anakin’s dialogue on the cringey side.

There’s no legitimate defense of that movie.

Post
#1529474
Topic
Has anyone Read the Book The Secret History of Star Wars by Michael Kaminski?
Time

JF_Sanderson said:

If Vader was Luke’s father in 1978, was he Anakin at that point? The whole “Obi Wan never told you… Etc… I am your father” does not entirely preclude the possibility that he, as a separate guy named Darth, sired Luke with Mrs. Skywalker.

I imagine Lucas was keeping his options open at that point.

Post
#1529022
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

Channel72 said:

G&G-Fan said:

Michael Corleone from The Godfather is a better young Darth Vader then the actual young Darth Vader.

The Prequels miss so much of the nuance that made Vader so great in the OT. His sadistic humor, his boldness, his cold, domineering presence, how calculating he was. In the Prequels, he’s a hot-head that flies off the handle. OT Vader got mad, but he wielded it like a blunt weapon. OT Vader is like Michael Corleone, but PT Anakin is like Sonny Corleone (at least in terms of temper; Sonny was never intolerably whiny). And that doesn’t mix. They’re two different characters.

If I wrote the Prequels I would have at least one scene where Anakin says “Impressive” and maybe another scene where he says “All too easy.”

I would have zero scenes where Anakin says “You will not take her from me!!!1!!”

Don’t forget the trademark belt grip.

Post
#1528446
Topic
The Random EU Thoughts Thread
Time

Servii said:

I get the disdain for a lot of larger EU projects though. Especially the entire Shadows of the Empire project, the disdain for that one I totally get. Prince Sex Pest and the Han Solo replacement don’t have much lasting appeal.

It’a funny you mention that, cause I’m actually rereading Shadows of the Empire right now. I read it over a decade ago, and the writing is a lot cornier than I remembered. The writing style is clearly oriented toward a younger reader, which makes the creepy Xizor scenes feel even more out-of-place and weird.

The best thing we got out of that whole MMP was all the cool artwork the Hildebrandt brothers did depicting scenes from the book. I love those.

I still don’t get why’d people get vitriolic about it, though. It’s non-canon and has no bearing on current Star Wars. It’s just something harmless that’s there for people to look back on and enjoy, if they want to.

I loved Shadows of the Empire when I read it in high school. All the SW material I’d consumed up to that point had been pretty chaste, so I was … interested … by the plot’s relatively heavy involvement of sex. I also really liked the insight into Vader’s character. But when I revisited the novel in my twenties, none of that wowed me anymore. I find it meh nowadays.

Post
#1527795
Topic
The Random EU Thoughts Thread
Time

All I can say is that a big chunk of my own antipathy towards the EU back in the day was fueled by supercilious EUphiles* who were adamant that the Expanded Universe was incontrovertibly canon. And I won’t deny that I experienced schadenfreude when those same people were forced to eat crow.

*They also tended to be diehard PT/SE apologists, which also fanned the flames of contempt.

Post
#1527784
Topic
Reimagining the OT with more realistic space physics
Time

I’m not a science buff, but I have at least a rudimentary understanding of biology and physics, and it does vex me immensely when I see sci-fi works blatantly disregard physical laws. Star Trek is a perfect exemplar of what I’m taking about, which is why I have an immense love/hate relationship with that franchise. And this came to colour my perception of Star Wars, too. But there’s a thread on this site which makes a strong case that SW was never meant to be viewed as sci-fi, but rather Surrealist fantasy.

https://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Star-Wars-is-Surrealism-not-Science-Fiction-essay/id/82402

Viewed through that lens, the 2D space travel, human-piloted fighters, giant legged walkers, and other logically implausible elements SW is rife with don’t bother me so bad.

Post
#1527782
Topic
The Unpopular Film, TV, Music, Art, Books, Comics, Games, &amp; Technology Opinion Thread (for all you contrarians!)
Time

StarkillerAG said:

Superweapon VII said:

At least 99% of all modern mainstream musicians with any acclaim are overrated, IMO. Genuinely great modern music isn’t the stuff you’re likely to hear on the radio.

I definitely agree, especially in the last few years.

I saw a very interesting video, arguing that the rise of TikTok is what killed pop music. Ever since Old Town Road became a massive hit due to its popularity on the platform, record labels have been demanding that pretty much every song needs to be “danceable on TikTok”; with a trap beat, gimmicky lyrics, and a general feeling of generic-ness. Indie music is the only genre where you can escape producers demanding that artists pander to ADHD-addled teenagers.

Heh. As someone who felt mainstream music had already reached its nadir by 2010, the notion that it’s gotten even worse makes me giddy.