logo Sign In

Stinky-Dinkins

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Jun-2005
Last activity
23-Mar-2024
Posts
1,265

Post History

Post
#909745
Topic
Team Negative1
Time

That sucks, on every end pretty much. How did they gain “access” to a print, or scans of it, that was not theirs to disseminate? I don’t really care about the drama or fine details really, it’s just a shame that the Technicolor print project looks (looked?) so astronomically promising. Too good to be true, I guess.

Post
#909354
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

alienmem said:

Ok.that’s fair enough. What programs does that the best:
tsMuxER, multiAVCHD, other?

I do have the mkv’s

I personally use tsMuxer, but I’ve had the program for a long time and I’ve heard when trying to install it now, from its newest .exe, it attemps to install a lot of turdware during the installation (didn’t do this when I installed it). Just be sure to use the advanced installation if you go that route and uncheck everything you don’t want - don’t let it do its own thing.

Using tsmuxer you just simply add the file and the output the file in a BD friendly format (like iso for example,) click a button and you’re done. Use Imgburn afterwards to burn it to a BD.

By the way have you seen these news:
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/watch-new-scan-of-the-original-1977-35mm-print-of-star-wars-vs-the-official-blu-ray-release-20160218

Yeah, it’s a beautiful release. It was completed by an account/team here and you can read more about it:

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/team-negative1-star-wars-1977-35mm-theatrical-version-release-details-and-updates/id/14590/page/123#909007

They’re also working on a Technicolor scan release, which looks even better based on the previews they’ve released so far.

The Negative 1 release is different than the DeEd release and both have their advantages and disadvantages. The -1 release is very much like watching an actual projected 35mm presentation (complete with the occasional pops, specks, flecks, and stuff you’d see inherent to older celluloid) but it is very much an absolutely “pure” presentation of the original film (and the aforementioned “flaws” add to authentic filmic feel of the presentation), complete with one original theatrical stereo English track. DeEd is a more “pristine” presentation by way of “meticulous intervention” on Harmy’s part, with many audio options (like the Hairy Hen DTS MA surrounds track), language dubs, and more resolvable detail, etc. Both are fantastic and absolutely worth it, but in my opinion “worth it” in such different ways that both are must-haves and one doesn’t render the other obsolete or inferior in any way, shape, or form (like, say, v2.5 of DeEd renders its previous iterations obsolete.)

Post
#909275
Topic
Team Negative1 - Star Wars 1977 - 35mm Eastman Vs Technicolot Theatrical Version (* unfinished project *)
Time

That looks incredible, completely amazing. The amount of resolvable detail looks to be pretty much on par with the official BD, and with the grain it looks far more natural and pleasing.

Why is the Technicolor frame cropped slightly? I’m sure it’s been covered before but is the cropping measurably different than, say, the BD version which looks to be more opened up especially on the sides?

Post
#908952
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

Alpinerock25 said:

Stinky-Dinkins said:

DL’d it and watched it. It’s fucking beautiful. It’s just such a “pure” experience, it doesn’t get any more filmic than this (and the grain structure throughout and the occasional celluloid blobs and worms or whatever those things are popping up for a frame don’t detract from it at all, they actually add to the feel.) Great job.

Please see posts above. Can you help me?

Sorry man but I can’t, I would if I could but I know nothing about torrents. I used a combination of Paradox to grab the links, JDownloader to DL and combine them from Uloz, and tsmuxer to turn it into BD-compatible file.

Post
#908915
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

DL’d it and watched it. It’s fucking beautiful. It’s just such a “pure” experience, it doesn’t get any more filmic than this (and the grain structure throughout and the occasional celluloid blobs and worms or whatever those things are popping up for a frame don’t detract from it at all, they actually add to the feel.) Absolutely phenomenal job.

Post
#907352
Topic
Harmy's RETURN OF THE JEDI Despecialized Edition HD - V3.1
Time

Wario64I said:

Stinky-Dinkins said:

Wait, so is the BD/MKV version of Jedi 2.5 completely done and out there in the wild? I know where to find it and everything if it is but I’m at work so I can’t check, and the thread title makes it seem like it’s still the AVCHD version, and every time I try to go back a page, or go to the first page, it just brings me to the last page again.

Yeah, I’m that guy now.

It’s on kat cr

I don’t know what this means. I just use Paradox/JDownloader/Uloz.

Laserschwert said:

Wario64I said:

Stinky-Dinkins said:

Wait, so is the BD/MKV version of Jedi 2.5 completely done and out there in the wild? I know where to find it and everything if it is but I’m at work so I can’t check, and the thread title makes it seem like it’s still the AVCHD version, and every time I try to go back a page, or go to the first page, it just brings me to the last page again.

Yeah, I’m that guy now.

It’s on kat cr

Exactly not what he asked.

So yeah, ROTJ 2.5 MKV is out.

Fucking awesome. Will be downloading it tonight. SOMEONE PUT FRINK ON THE HORN AND TELL HIM I WILL BE DOWNLOADING IT TONIGHT.

Post
#907336
Topic
Harmy's RETURN OF THE JEDI Despecialized Edition HD - V3.1
Time

Wait, so is the BD/MKV version of Jedi 2.5 completely done and out there in the wild? I know where to find it and everything if it is but I’m at work so I can’t check, and the thread title makes it seem like it’s still the AVCHD version, and every time I try to go back a page, or go to the first page, it just brings me to the last page again.

Yeah, I’m that guy now.

Post
#903406
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

iton said:

Hey guys I realise I’m a little late to the party and first off I’d like to give a huge thank you to Team Negative and a big congratulations, it’s simply amazing and gorgeous and is a better version of the film than I ever thought I’d see in these troubled times.
However, I would like to ask how I can burn the film onto a disk. I was able to burn Harmy’s Despecialized Edition onto verbatim DVD+R DL disks but they’re max size is 8.5GB and this is 21GB.
1: Is it possible to put this onto a disk?
2: What disks do I need to buy?
3: If my computer can burn the Despecialized Edition will it be able to burn this (do I need to download any more software or by a different disk drive or something?)
Sorry if my questions have already been asked, I looked through the thread but I’ll admit that it’s late and I may have skim read some pages near the end.
Thanks in advance

The newest editions of Harmy’s Despecialized are around 20 gigs for both Star Wars and Empire, so if you have 8.5gb versions you have the old outdated editions (apart from Jedi, which he is finishing now.)

To burn this to a disc you’ll need to use blank BD’s and a BD burner. I use an LG burner and Falcon Pro SmartGuard BD discs (high quality media and great printing surface). Assuming you used ImgBurn to burn the old Despecialized versions to DVD, you can use that same program to burn Negative 1’s 35mm presentation to BD, the process is largely the same it’s just that the hardware and disc media are different.

Post
#896224
Topic
Harmy's RETURN OF THE JEDI Despecialized Edition HD - V3.1
Time

Get tsMuxeR HERE:

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=168539

DL’ing it from some random site can be risky depending on which site you use. Lots of them bundle garbage, spyware, and viruses along with “free” software. The DL on the Doom9 forum is definitely safe (and tsMuxeR itself is also safe and adware free).

Post
#896212
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

althor1138 said:

Harmy said:

Well, actually, ISO may be a little better, since it’s easier not to screw up the burning process. But content-wise, definitely the same thing.

I haven’t been paying attention to the BD projects here in this thread but thought I should mention that if you have integrated (real) seamless branching somewhere on the disc then it is imperative that you burn from the disc image in order to maintain the physical disc layout and prevent skipping during playback of the branches. With the right authoring software it will interleave the 2 branches so that they occupy a similar space on the disc to prevent the laser from having to bounce around. Otherwise, yeah, about the same thing.

I doesn’t have seamless branching.

And it isn’t “about” the same thing, it is the same thing.

Post
#895891
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

imail724 said:

Stinky-Dinkins said:

Ben-Solo said:

I was wondering if let’s say I wanted to burn these onto a BD-RW what would you recommend Harmy? I want to make sure this is burnt properly on a BD for the best viewing experience on an HDTV.

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/784975#TopicPost784975

Hmm… I just burned these a few days ago without seeing this post. I used TSMuxer to output to Blu-Ray Disc then just burned the ISO with Imgburn. The disc played fine as far as I can tell. What would be the advantage of doing it your way? Was there a loss of quality in the way I did it?

No difference, it’ll be identical.