Spartacus01

fmalover said:

Spartacus01 said:

In retrospect, I think that the best thing that Lucas could have done was keeping Lucasfilm away from Disney and maintaining it as an independent company, but still retiring to private life and putting someone else in charge of Lucasfilm, possibly not Dave Filoni.

In that scenario I fear Lucasfilm would have turned into Filoni’s fanfiction playground. I’m glad we aren’t living in that world.

I said “possibly NOT Dave Filoni”.

On the one hand, I’m glad that Lucas didn’t have the opportunity to make the Sequel Trilogy the way he wanted to, because I strongly dislike his ideas for the Sequels, and I’m genuinely happy that Disney decided not to use them when they decided to make the Sequels. On the other hand, though, I think that almost everything that has been released by Disney so far has been extremely disappointing to say the least, except for Rogue One and Andor. So, I have mixed feelings about this subject. In retrospect, I think that the best thing that Lucas could have done was keeping Lucasfilm away from Disney and maintaining it as an independent company, but still retiring to private life and putting someone else in charge of Lucasfilm, possibly not Dave Filoni.

Dormé (the handmaiden that was played by Rose Byrne in Attack of the Clones) is actually Anakin’s half-sister. Dormé’s father lived on Tatooine for some years, and had a romance with Shmi before she was captured and sold into slavery. The Hutts captured her shortly after she gave birth to Dormé, but the newborn Dormé and her father managed to escape without being captured by the Hutts, and fled to Naboo. Shmi never saw Dormé and her father again, and the Force impregnated her two years after she was sold as a slave to Watto. She never tried to look for Dormé and her father even after she was freed from slavery, because she knew that both of them had a completely new life at that point, and she didn’t want to mess up their lives. And Dormé never knew that she was adopted, because both her father and her adoptive mother never told her. So… yeah, one of Padmé’s handmaidens was actually related to Anakin, and neither of them ever knew that.

Vladius said:

I strongly disagree with points 3 and 4 but I guess that’s the idea. I think those opinions are already more popular than the inverse though.

Well, they are unpopular opinions on here, so I think it still counts hahaha. Besides, my opinion on the Revan novel and The Old Republic is actually quite unpopular. In fact, I see people bashing on both the novel and the game almost on every EU forum and subreddit.

I know! I don’t understand why the forum created two threads… Lol!

Since there’s already a general Unpopular Opinion Thread, I thought it would have been nice to start a thread dedicated to unpopular opinions specifically related to the Expanded Universe.

I will start with some of my unpopular opinions.

1. I honestly don’t find the post-ROTJ stories from the EU to be that interesting. I’m much more interested in the Old Republic, the Prequel era, and the Imperial era up until the Battle of Endor. I don’t mind the post-ROTJ stories (if we exclude anything post-NJO), I just find the pre-ROTJ stories to be more interesting.
2. I don’t mind the Old Republic MMO, I actually like it quite a lot. However, I think that the expansions are much worse than the original, base game. They introduce a lot of plots that are convoluted and unnecessary, like Vitiate coming back a million times, the Eternal Empire, Malgus surviving, etc. Therefore, even though I actually like the game, I try to stick with the original story and ignore the expansions.
3. The Revan novel — and The Old Republic in general — don’t ruin Revan’s character. Yes, they ruin the Jedi Exile from Knights of the Old Republic II, but they don’t ruin Revan in my opinion.
4. I vastly prefer the way in which the Clone Wars were portrayed in the Prequels (and the 2000s EU) over the vague image of the war that results from reading the Thrawn Trilogy and the rest of the pre-Prequels EU.
5. The old EU didn’t have as much contradictions as anti-EU people claim. It was consistent with itself at least 70% of the time. Which doesn’t mean that there were not contradictions, of course, but they were not nearly as much as some people claim. Especially when you consider how many authors wrote in the EU and how many books and comics were supposed to exist in the same universe, the existence of some contradictions can be totally forgiven. Also, I think that the 2008 Clone Wars TV show was responsible for a good portion of the contradictions of the old EU.

Excited to read your own unpopular opinions as well.

The timeline of the Clone Wars Multimedia Project is far more consistent and works way better if you remove Tartakovsky’s Clone Wars show from it.

I had a nice idea. It’s not very radical, but I think it is worth trying, even though it requires some effort, as well as some knowledge about how to create new special effects.

So… I think that you all remember the scene where Anakin kills the younglings in Revenge of the Sith. Before Anakin kills the younglings, the camera focuses on his face for a second. Well, I was thinking that it would be nice to try to create the special effect of a tear falling from his eye and running down his cheek, just before the camera cuts to his lightsaber turning on.

Artificially inserting a tear on Anakin’s face at that precise moment would allow us to make it seem that he’s thinking something like: “I feel like crap. I don’t want to do this. But I have to…”

I think it’s worth trying.

My updated ranking with all the films:

1. Revenge of the Sith
2. A New Hope
3. Rogue One
4. Attack of the Clones
5. Return of the Jedi
6. The Empire Strikes Back
7. The Phantom Menace
8. The Force Awakens
9. The Clone Wars
10. Solo
11. The Last Jedi
12. The Rise of Skywalker

Shrek 3 is a good movie.

Gandalf the Cyan said:

I can give Lucas a bit of slack for the lucklusterness of the PT and ROTJ, since he was ultimately just trying to make pulpy Flash Gordon-esque adventures, not high-art movies. ANH and ESB, however, were so good that they’re generally considered to have entered into the realm of high art. He then fell into a trap where his subsequent films were expected to be masterpieces as well, and I agree that he could have definitely done better on them. But since he really knocked it out of the park on his first 2 SW films, fans’ expectations were higher than his.

I agree 100%. It’s fair to have high expectations, but expecting every Star Wars movie to be a perfect, flawless work of art is unrealistic, and it’s exactly what a lot of fans don’t seem to understand. Star Wars is always beautiful, even when it has some flaws. If it didnt have flaws, there would be nothing to talk about, and places like this forum wouldn’t even exist.

Personally, I think that it’s way more fun to fill in the blanks with your own imagination than having TV shows, books and comics before, between, and after the movies. Using your own imagination to imagine what happened between Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith is way more fun than watching The Clone Wars, or reading the Clone Wars Multimedia Project. Using your own imagination to imagine what happened in the Old Republic era is much more fun than playing Knights of the Old Republic, or playing the Old Republic MMO. Using your own imagination to imagine Luke’s future adventures after Return of the Jedi is way more fun than reading the EU, or watching the Sequels.

From my own experience, I can tell that casual fans are the kind of fans that experience Star Wars in the best possible way. When you are overly attached and overly obsessed with Star Wars, you have nothing but constant arguments and continuous headaches, you always find something to criticize, and the way you experience Star Wars is not as relaxed as it should be. On the other hand, when you are a more casual fan who just wants to enjoy Star Wars and doesn’t care very much about anything outside of the films, you really have the best experience because you have a more relaxed approach to the whole thing. Sure, you can still dislike some of the movies, but you will have a more relaxed approach in general, because your dislike will not go beyond the simple “I don’t like this, this and that”, without carrying your sentiment over time as if it was an obsession, indeed, and without being frustrated for the rest of your life because things didn’t go the way you wanted to.

I think I had a couple of ideas that could fix the Sequel Trilogy. However, they can’t be implemented right now, because they are very radical ideas and we still don’t have the means to implement them. Therefore, we should wait for the technology to advance enough as to allow us to create entire new scenes, with a good mix of AI and CGI.

My ideas are:

1. Modifying the reason that brought Luke to go into exile in The Last Jedi. Instead of going into exile to hide from his responsibilities, Luke went into exile to meditate, understand what he did wrong with Kylo and his New Jedi Order, and study a way to defeat the First Order. When Rey arrives, he realizes that the time has come, so he tells Rey what he did wrong, what the Jedi Order from the Prequels did wrong, and tells her that the Jedi need to be reformed (exactly in the same way Luke reformed the Jedi Order in Legends by abolishing some of the old rules). Then, he dies at the end of The Last Jedi by sacrificing himself to allow the Resistance to escape from Crait.

2. In The Rise of Skywalker, Palpatine doesn’t come back. Instead, it is Snoke the one who comes back. After all, if Palpatine can come back, why can’t Snoke? So, everything from The Rise of Skywalker would be very similar to the original version of the movie, but with resurrected Snoke instead of resurrected Palpatine. Snoke pretends to want to give Kylo another chance to rule the Galaxy with him, and pushes him to bring Rey before him. However, when she arrives he reveals that she was his real target for the entire movie, because she is much more powerful than Kylo ever was, and Snoke wants her to become his new apprentice. He reveals that Rey is Palpatine’s granddaughter, and that this is the reason for her abnormous power. Then, he also reveals that he has always been Vitiate all along, and has waited in hiding since the times of the Old Republic. He was waiting for the right time to come and reclaim the Galaxy for himself.

3. In the final confrontation with resurrected Snoke/Vitiate, the Force ghosts of Anakin, Luke, Leia, Obi-Wan, Yoda and Qui-Gon appear. Anakin’s ghost is the one who actually defeats Snoke/Vitiate, thus ending the Sith for good, and confirming that he was indeed the Chosen One who was destined to destroy the Sith once and for all.

4. At the end of The Rise of Skywalker, both Rey and a redeemed Ben Solo survive. We have a small time jump of some years, and the last thing we see is the two of them standing before a class of students in the New Jedi Temple on Naboo, telling them about the adventures of Luke and Anakin Skywalker, and teaching them the importance of redemption.

What do you think?

Me too.

Although I respect everyone’s opinions, I have never understood people who say that the Prequels shouldn’t have existed and that it wasn’t necessary to know Anakin Skywalker’s backstory. Personally, I am of the opinion that knowing the backstory of a villain makes the moment of his redemption way more impactful. If you don’t know the backstory of a villain, the moment in which he is redeemed is certainly beautiful, but It is not so impactful. He remains simply that, a villain who is redeemed. On the contrary, if you know the reasons why he became a villain, then the moment of his redemption takes on a completely different meaning.

Channel72 said:

Spartacus01 said:
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to attack you or anything. But I think that you are being guilty of the same extremism you are criticizing. You said: “You can look at them as pieces of pop entertainment or as serious films or both, but you don’t have to go to extremes either way”, which is totally correct. But then, when it comes to the history of the movies and their appreciation by the fandom, you did the same thing you are preaching against: generalizing. Sure, I’m one of those millennials who were not around at the time, I became a Star Wars fan in 2018. But I don’t think that saying that everyone hated the movies is fair. I think that it is more fair to say that the fanbase felt very divided about them. I have known a lot of people who liked them from the beginning, just as I have known a lot of people who disliked them from the beginning. There were a lot of fans who liked the Prequels in the 2000s, just as there were a lot of fans who hated them in the same time period. Saying that everyone hated the movies is unfair to the people who always liked them. And they exist, denying their existence is unfair too. Furthermore, I have known a lot of people who became fans of the Saga only in recent years, watched the Prequels as adults, and liked them a lot. I’m one of them. So, to say that they became popular in recent years only because of nostalgia and the memes is a bit unfair too. I liked them when I first watched them. And I was already 18 when I watched them, so I didn’t have any nostalgia for them.

I was a teenager when TPM came out in 1999. I wouldn’t say everyone hated the Prequels initially at the time. But it would be hard to be alive during 1999 thru 2005 and not conclude that, in general, on average, people did not like these movies. These were not to be new classics, like the OT. They were instead the endless punch line of jokes across pop culture (e.g. the Southpark episode mocking Jar Jar, etc.) I never actually met anyone at the time (in my circle of friends or outside it) who actually thought these movies were genuinely good. At best, you had people saying that ROTS was good but the others sucked.

Now - of course, the whole paragraph I just typed is nothing but anecdotal evidence. It proves nothing. And of course, there were also many Prequel fans in 1999-2005 as well who passionately defended these films (just look at theforce.net). To get a truly accurate sense of general public or average fan opinion at the time these movies were released, you would need to have conducted properly-worded opinion polls that randomly sampled some cross section of movie-goers. Unfortunately, such comprehensive scientific polls were not conducted as far as I know. So the only thing I have is my anecdotal impression from having lived through that time. My conjecture, based on anecdotal evidence, is something like 60% to 70% of Star Wars fans (provided we could agree on the definition of “Star Wars fan”) had a negative opinion of two or more of these films. But again, I certainly cannot prove this, and I admit that negative opinions are likely to be voiced more loudly than positive opinions, potentially biasing my impression.

A bit more objectively, I can say that the media at least was more hostile to the Prequels than they were to the first two Disney films, which may have affected fan opinion. If I were inclined to devote time to it, I could probably prove this assertion by randomly sampling popular Internet or print publications or opinion pieces discussing the Prequels from 1999 through 2005. This would probably produce something like 65% negative, 35% positive sentiment, averaged across the three films, in my estimate (again a conjecture). Maybe closer to 60% negative, 40% positive right after ROTS. I could be wildly off, but I would be very surprised.

What I can say for sure is that nowadays there are a lot of ideas about the Prequels floating around the Internet that are blatant revisionist history. These ideas include things like “everyone loved the Prequels until those Plinkett reviews came out in 2009”. This is certainly false. Almost every single criticism made in those videos was typical stuff discussed between friends and pre-social media Internet forums long before Plinkett. (For fun, here’s a 1999 review of TPM that essentially makes the same points found in your typical anti-Prequel youtube video nowadays).

Also, remember that in 1999, TPM was hyped as this monumental, Earth-shattering event - with Lucas descending once again from Mount Sinai Skywalker Ranch to deliver unto us a New Testament from a Galaxy far far away. I lived through both the hype of Phantom Menace and the hype of Force Awakens, and the hype for Force Awakens was nothing compared to what happened in 1999. Remember, at this time, the fanbase was mostly unified, and viewed George Lucas as this master storyteller of unparalleled creative genius who could do no wrong (except Howard the Duck). This environment certainly did not help when the movies came out and not only failed to live up to the hype, but seemed to be just weirdly mediocre movies in general.

Don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t my intention to start a discussion about how the Prequel Trilogy was received by the fandom. Personally, I’ve never been one of those people who’s always tried to prove that the Prequels weren’t as hated as everybody say, because I never gave a damn in general. I have my own opinions, and even if I were the only person in the world who liked the Prequels, I would still like them anyway. I don’t care about what people think, therefore it wasn’t my intention to start a discussion about the fan reception of those films. What I was trying to say in the message you quoted is that, in my opinion, there is no denying that the hatred towards the Prequels was definitely exaggerated. I mean, as long as you just say “I don’t like those movies” and list the reasons why you don’t like them in a respectful way, then there is nothing wrong, because everyone has the right to have their own opinions and their own personal tastes, after all. The problem is that, as Mark Hamill also said, the hatred for the Prequels at the time went far beyond the simple “I don’t like them”. There are actors who have received death threats, actors who have even tried to commit suicide, and George Lucas was covered by a mountain of poop for almost 10 years. Objectively speaking, you can’t deny that this isn’t good. Even if the Prequels were the worst films ever created in the history of mankind, that still doesn’t justify the behavior that many toxic fans had at the time.

I can’t wait to watch both the trailer and the complete trilogy! I am always enthusiastic about fan edits that try to fix the Sequels, because I really, really want to have a good Sequel Trilogy for Star Wars, with all my heart.

StarkillerAG said:

The Sequels (my hypothetical fanedit where Palpatine never comes back)

Ah, that sounds interesting. Can you elaborate, please? What are your ideas to fix the Sequel Trilogy?

I personally think that Lucifer (the TV show) should have ended with Season 4. I know that ending it with Season 4 makes God look like an asshole, but I personally believe that it is still better than what happened in the last two seasons. Season 4 had A perfect finale in my opinion.

I know that this kind of contradicts both Canon and Legends encyclopedias, but I maintain that the first life forms in the entire history of the Galaxy developed on Naboo. Then, life spread from Naboo to the rest of the Galaxy through panspermia.

After further consideration, I have decided to change my approach and include the Dawn of the Jedi comics and the New Jedi Order series back into my timeline. I have come to realize that I enjoy these stories far too much to exclude them. The New Jedi Order series, with its intricate storytelling and compelling character arcs, adds significant depth and complexity to the Star Wars universe. Similarly, the Dawn of the Jedi comics provide a fascinating exploration of the galaxy’s ancient past, rich with new ideas and an intriguing origin story for the Jedi Order. While I still appreciate the hopeful conclusion offered by the Young Jedi Knights series, I find that the inclusion of the New Jedi Order enhances the narrative scope and allows for a more expansive and engaging timeline. As a result, I have revised my personal canon to accommodate these works, reaffirming my appreciation for the broader and more diverse storytelling they provide. Therefore, I have basically come back to my original personal Canon list.

The Sequel Trilogy should have been a Prequel Trilogy 2.0. They should have acknowledged the victories of the previous generation, and should have shown the Galaxy in a peaceful state at the beginning. Then, they should have shown how things started to get worse and worse, until someone falls to the Dark Side and destroys everything again. After that, the fourth trilogy should have been about re-establishing democracy and freedom in the Galaxy and fighting evil, like the Original Trilogy.

Superweapon VII said:
I generally accept the events of TOS as canon – minus such gems as “The Alternative Factor” and “Turnabout Intruder” – but not the visuals, which I think have aged terribly and look cheap/cheesy today. So I imagine the “true” TOS ships, uniforms, aliens, etc. looking closer to the ones in SNW, though I DO NOT consider SNW canon.

Hey, that’s basically what I do as well! I accept The Original Series, but I imagine it with the Strange New Worlds aesthetics, even though I don’t accept Strange New Worlds itself as Canon.

Fan_edit_fan said:
You’re coming across as ultra defensive and also that you weren’t alive then…or aware then. So since you obviously weren’t around for the release of the PT then sit down and chill out. Love the PT all you want.

I’m not ultra-defensive. I just find it annoying that there are people who try to portray the Prequel hate from the early 2000s as something acceptable and understandable, and who even deny the existence of Prequel fans before 2015. The Prequel hate from the early 2000s brought actors like Ahmed Best to almost commit suicide, not to mention the hundreds of death threats that Hayden Christensen received. Trying to defend the Prequel backlash of the time (or even reducing it to simple “criticism”) is intellectually dishonest, in my opinion. Of course, you can criticize the Prequels all you want. Hell, I criticize some aspects of the Prequels too (despite liking them for the most part). But you can’t deny that the level of hate and backlash they received was unnecessary, toxic, and sometimes even borderline insane.

Fan_edit_fan said:
I think it’s cruel you showed the movies in chronological order haha. You ruin the surprises of the OT.

The Vader twist from The Empire Strikes Back is something that almost the entire planet knows at this point, though. Even people who never saw Star Wars in their lives know that Darth Vader is Luke’s father. It is something that has become intrinsically part of pop culture. So I don’t think I’m ruining anything. Virtually every single person who interacted with pop culture know that. From my experience, there are more people who don’t know that Anakin Skywalker is Darth Vader than people who don’t know that Darth Vader is Luke’s father. Also, the chronological order is the order George Lucas told us to watch the movies, and there is a reason for that. Watching the Original Trilogy first gives you a different perception than watching the Prequel Trilogy first. Not to mention, I’m a meticulous person, so I always like to do things chronologically.

Fan_edit_fan said:
And on the other hand I DON’T believe you that they liked the PT more 🤷‍♂️.

I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I didn’t say that my friends liked the Prequels more than the Original Trilogy. I only said that they appreciated the Prequels more than the people who watched the movies in release order tend to do, precisely due to the fact that they watched the Prequels first.