RicOlie_2

More universe shrinkage and stupidity. That's like me dating an intelligent snake or something.

SilverWook said:

Sexual orientation might not even be a big deal in the SW universe. Are there even any sexual scenes in any of the books?

Some people have accused Ziro the Hutt of being a flaming gay stereotype, although there is no onscreen evidence of it.

In the Marvel comic, former Senator Simon Greyshade and his shiny pal Master Com might have been the first robosexuals though. At least the parody comic Jaxxon's 11 ran with the idea. ;)

 Hutts are supposed to be both male and female, so they were probably just working with that aspect of the species. I haven't seen the Clone Wars movie though, so I don't really know how he was portrayed.

Bingowings said:

It's possible he just remembered he already had an account and had to choose between them.

Buy yeah, deleting your posts is a bad thing to do.

Maybe he's this guy? The letter P seems to be in common between them.

We found some baby Convict Cichlids just a few minutes ago. Those are the first of that species, but we've also had baby Guppies (these are livebearers and we raised about 50 to adulthood), Bronze Corys (a small type of catfish--only one has survived so far, and it isn't quite adult yet. This is the only egg-laying species of fish until the Convict Cichlids that has produced babies for us), Platys (one of which has survived), and Swordtails (all of which died). The Convict Cichlids are unique out of those in that they protect their babies until they're old enough to fend for themselves. I would post pictures, but Flickr was updated again, and I can't figure out how to link to photos yet...

EDIT:

In case you're interested, here are some links to pictures of some of the fish I mentioned:

an adult Convict Cichlid, a baby guppy, another one, and an adult Cory (not the same species as the babies were).

CO, Lucas will not be putting Chewbacca in Episode VII because he's hardly involved in the making of the movie. So whether or not a lot of canon is retained has nothing to do with George. The Clone Wars series overwrote and contradicted a lot of Clone War-era EU, so George doesn't seem to care a whole lot about the majority of the EU.

One of my favourite scenes in terms of background acting is the one where Luke is training on the Millenium Falcon. Harrison Ford, though not the focus, still acts in the background throughout the scene. It looks natural. In the prequels, the actors can't even act properly in the foreground.

CE-10g

I need to do something about that treacherous fox of yours...

OK, no worries. I thought you sent me a link to the same zillions file you had downloaded. Am I mistaken, or had it been updated since you downloaded it?

Oops! Yes, I'm playing the Forward FIDEs, not the Fabulous FIDEs. How did you end up switching armies when we restarted the game? :P

It's very silly that governments make laws they know will be broken, and then have a police force to enforce them, and courts to send the violators people to prison.

I hardly think God is "surprised" when people reject him. I believe that he is a merciful and understanding God, since he made us this way and he is omniscient and omnipresent. An omniscient/omnipresent God wouldn't be surprised about anything, nor would he be worried in the normal sense of the word, since he already knows what's going to happen.

That's a great way to explain God's system of revelation, ender. According to the Bible, God had a hard enough time getting the Israelites/Hebrews to be faithful to him even with the Mosaic Law, so I doubt he would have had any luck giving them a full revelation all at once.

Easterhay said:

darklordoftech said:

Jedi stupidity. Thinking the Sith are extinct when the Sith have faked extinction before is absolutely nonsensical.

Oh, aye? What film was that in, then?

 If you're pointing out that the Sith hadn't faked extinction before, I guess you're right. That would be the fault of the EU.

Ryan McAvoy said:

Bingowings said:

The gag should be that the original version looked good and the additions are bad so I would use Harmy as a source for the original footage and the 2004 SE for the additions including the colar mismatch.

 ^ This

 Well, I thought it work better to exaggerate how bad the GOUT looks. If Frink wants to exaggerate how bad the SE looks, that would work too. I think he should go with whichever looks the most obvious.

May 10:

A.D. 1534: Jacques Cartier reaches Newfoundland.

A.D. 1559: Scottish Protestant uprising against the queen mother Mary.

A.D. 1570: Czar Ivan IV becomes Protestant.

A.D. 1752: Benjamin Franklin's famous kite and lightning experiment.

Someone on this site has that as an avatar...not sure who.

May 9:

1457 B.C.: The Battle of Megiddo between Thutmose III's Epyptian forces and a Canaanite army. This is the earliest battle that has been recorded in reliable detail.

A.D. 328: St. Athanasius is appointed bishop of Alexandria.

A.D. 1386: The Treaty of Windsor between England and Portugal. This is the oldest diplomatic alliance in the world that is still in force.

A.D. 1502: Columbus leaves Spain on his fourth voyage to the New World.

If the GOUT's bad quality isn't obvious enough, you should downscale it/use a lower quality version to exaggerate the difference.

Ah, that must be it.

I don't know if you'll be up to it, Frink, but you should cover up the SE additions in Mos Eisley with low quality frames from the GOUT. I don't mean replace the whole frame, but just that section of the frame--if you can do it.

You didn't even notice when I pointed it out.

Palpatine would presumably be able to bend Luke to his will if Luke gave into the dark side. It is possible, however, that he would be able to resist Palpatine's domination and die instead.

darklordoftech said:

Easterhay said:

What?

By striking down Vader in anger, you're saying that those means would achieve the end of the Emperor and his empire. And I'm saying you're wrong, based on... well, take your pick, really, from various lines of dialogue throughout the films about striking out in anger and using your powers for attack, not knowledge or defence.

Those means could fail to bring down Palpatine and the Empire, but neither would those means lead to Luke joining Palpatine. 

 Yes it would. Do you not understand the movie? Luke would be going over to the dark side by bringing down Vader, and there's no way he could overcome Palpatine, since Palpatine is so powerful and Luke is inexperienced.

SP-6d

No, I didn't. The bishight moves backwards as a knight. It was on e5 previous to my last move.

If you're sticking the castle move, Bxf5