bigbaddaddyvader said:
Yes because an archaeologist scouring the world and battling Nazis for the lost ark of the covenant and then battling crazy heart-ripping,voodoo doll using (in India) cultists to retrieve three magic stones and then just for good measure finding the holy grail,no less,after searching through tombs in Venice while battling impossibly hot blond Nazi chicks and getting Herr Hitler's autograph in the process is SO completely feasible.
IJ&TOD is my least favorite part in the trilogy and I do find its plot to be waaay too close to a B-movie.
bigbaddaddyvader said:
Damn come on!It's an Indiana Jones movie!Feasibility of plots and stories is not a concern,is it?
Up to a certain point. If I'm going to watch a superhero movie (Spiderman, Superman or whateverman) I know there will be people who can fly or who can jump over a building or who can do other ridiculous stuff. This doesn't mean that the plot is made of rubber and that its improbability can be stretched ad infinitum.
As I said, I'm not a nitpicker: "oh, Afrikakorps appeared only in 1940s, while we see its sign already in 1936", "oh, these aren't the real Messerschmitts Bf 109 as they should be, damn couldn't they make the prop planes look more like their real-life counterparts?". But I don't like the concept of going back to that warehouse, period. And to say this I didn't need to know the exact plot twists which would lead Indy there, zombie...
bigbaddaddyvader said:
Damn come on!It's an Indiana Jones movie!Feasibility of plots and stories is not a concern,is it?
Well, some people have fairly low standards, e.g.: they will buy anything with STAR WARS or Indiana Jones logo on it, no matter whether it's a good or bad product. I'm not one of them.