- Post
- #896356
- Topic
- Do you eat your vegetables?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/896356/action/topic#896356
- Time
Pork and broccoli= fantastic.
This user has been banned.
Pork and broccoli= fantastic.
I asked if you ate veggies, not if you eat only veggies.
I’m a real man – I eat the greens.
Good man. Have a green bean.
Do you eat your vegetables? I do. Broccoli, carrots, green beans, a little olive oil and soy sauce? Forget about it. Makes hair grow on my head instead of my ears. Sometimes I eat pizza too though, so are my ears hairy? That’s for you to decide. So so you eat your veggies? Or are you a punk ass bitch.
I don’t particularly like his music, but he was the primary reason for Stevie Ray Vaughan getting discovered, so I respect him. RIP
Aye.
I already did. I don’t want to complain too much though. I know he’s worked hard and I’m very grateful
I’d like tobitch about how with the new forum software I can’t find some of the stuff in the “classic lol moments” thread on account of if they link to a specific post it doesn’t show it in the context of the thread.
While the new feature of being able to see specific member’s post history is very interesting, it seems to have come with a drawback, in that linking to specific posts now only shows that specific post, and not within the context of the thread. So if you’re providing a thread and want somebody to start reading at a certain point, you now have to link to the page instead of the post.
That is no big deal at all, except that it has caused certain older threads to become difficult to navigate, since they will sometimes link to a certain post for you to begin reading at and you end up just having to search the whole thread to find what they were talking about.
Also would be nice, when reading a users post history, to be able to click on those posts and see them in the context of the thread, the responses they got, and so on.
Unless of course this is already possible and I’m just missing it, in which case I apologize for wasting your time.
Do yourselves a favor and watch edited versions of them. Still not great, but not as awful.
In addition to HAL’s, Q2’s trilogy is also fantastic at giving it a streamlined OT feel. It’s much leaner and has less annoying stuff than HAL’s does, for TPM anyway, but I still rate HAL’s slightly above Q2 for that particular film because HAL’s approach of completely removing Gungan City worked rather well I thought. Much better than just trying to rush through it.
Don’t ever joke about that!
It’s got a fresh rating on RT, don’t remember what the average rating was though.
I enjoyed Max Payne. It wasn’t a masterpiece, but I thought it was enjoyable.
The sorrow is too great.
Damnit, I didn’t even notice that DE did that or else I wouldn’t have even done mine.
In case anybody was interested, I’m almost done with the first film. Wasn’t really six months worth of work, but I didn’t work on it very consistently.
Just saw TFA again. 8/10. 9 If it weren’t for 2 or 3 bits of humor which could easily be edited out one day. Speaking of edits, I give HAL9000s prequels each a 7.5/10. Maybe I’m crazy, but while they definitely have flaws that make me never want to watch the theatrical again, I don’t see the prequels as the horrible abomination others do, and I think some edits salvage them to where I actually legitimately enjoy them.
Wtf? That’s how Spock was in those? Might as well call it something other than Star Trek and change their names.
This editor doesn’t use Markdown syntax, because it makes it annoying to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:
Preview the new Star Trek movie to see the results.
For more details, read The Lord of the Flies.
You should probably take some steps toward moving out, if you haven’t already.
This editor uses Markdown syntax, which makes it easy to add formatting like italics, bold, and lists:
What happens if you do?
I’ve never posted here, right from the beginning.
I suggest you take better care of your shit. I’ve never had headphones break that soon, even cheapies.