logo Sign In

Orinoco_Womble

User Group
Members
Join date
27-Mar-2008
Last activity
14-Mar-2021
Posts
139

Post History

Post
#324041
Topic
Laserdisc capturing - what is to be considered?
Time
Moth3r said:

Possibly the ideal would be to use a video scaler to convert the composite signal into component outputs (look on ebay, scalers are not as important in the digital age)

 

From what I can find on the net, the Faroudja 'video scalers' and video processors all seem to upsize the image and change it in some way and usually to a higher resolution.  The best I could find convert to 720P output as a minimum which I guess is not ideal considering LD is interlaced.  I thought the idea was to do the scaling and deinterlacing in s/w as this can have better results than scaling in real time.  The only devices that I could find that did not seem to scale the image were the two combfilter/chroma decoder devices that you mentioned in the X0 forum.

 

Has anybody used or owned any of these devices and can comment on all of this stuff please?

Post
#322684
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time

Just been reading through the older posts again and came across this post from Laserman:

Laserman said:

Thanks for the PM Moth3r.
By that I meant the best way to fix the problem is to do it electronically rather than trying to filter it later.
Basically the problem with Laserdisc is that even the best players crap out at around 5 to 5.5MHz. This leaves laserdisc with a relatively slow rise time (the time taken for a signal on the video path to change from one colour to another) and can cause the 'ringing' or halos as well as awful transitions between colours.
To solve the problem somewhat you can map the Chroma signal to the Luma signal. The Luma signal is relatively quick, around 150nanoseconds, whereas the chroma signal lags with a rise time of around 800nanoseconds. By devising a circuit to lock the chroma signal rise time to the Luma's faster rise time the effect can be pretty much eliminated, resulting in a DVD like picture from laserdisc.

If you have a laserdisc with a set of colourbars on it you can see the problem between the Magenta and Green vertical bars quite clearly.
If you were smarter than me you could then work out a way to lower the rise time of the Luma signal with some sort of rise time acceleration and nail the halos forever.

 

Now, this sounds really interesting.  Can anyone shed any further light on this whole 'remapping' business and how it might be achieved please?

Post
#322683
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
bkev said:

Perhaps my question was unneeded.  I was worried about a valued member of the community, is all.  You definitely have a point about it not being my business, Zombie; I just wished we knew more.  

 

 

Personally, I think it's a very valid question and there's nothing wrong with having concern for a mate.  Good on ya bKev.

Could someone on the X0 team please let us know if Laserman is ok?

Post
#322037
Topic
STAR WARS V8 - A Final Attempt (Released)
Time

g-force said:

That was Moth3r's quote, not mine! A mocomped-denoiser is one that motion compensates objects in previous and next frames to their positions in the current frame and does some sort of filtering (median, average, fft etc.) on those frames.

-G

 Oops, aploogies dude.  I got yours and Moth3r's quotes mixed up.  Thanks for answering the question though.

 

This place just gets more and more interesting every day :)

Post
#322034
Topic
Difference in quality of laserdisc players
Time

I've had a look and checked the D925 service manual to confirm what you are saying and from what I can tell it looks like Moth3r is correct (as usual).  According to the block diagram in the manual, the video for the Scart connector comes from exactly the same point in the circuit as the standard composite plug.  The composite video is then fed back from SCH4 to SCH3 and eventually back to the Audio board (SCH2).  This is probably to keep the wiring to the scart connector all neat and tidy inside the player.  It's most likely that you're looking at the audio board, which has all of the scart connections on it for Audio/video etc.  There is no additional processing done to the composite signal from when it leaves the point at the Composite plug, all the way across the 3 circuit boards listed and out through the SCART connector.  The composite output is exactly the same as that on the SCART connector.

Hope this helps.

Post
#321870
Topic
STAR WARS V8 - A Final Attempt (Released)
Time

Moth3r said:

Interesting. Did you use a TBC? Uncorrected VHS sources contain a fair bit of jitter or wobble from one capture to the next. Multi-capture averaging on this kind of source probably would end up blurring edges. Fortunately, laserdisc sources are much more stable.

Yeah, my video player has a built in TBC, which I think is only a line based unit and not a full frame jobbie as I'd like.
The tape I was trying to preserve is pretty fecked and the capture device was my DVD recorder, so probably not the best setup for testing the averaging method.  I found I got better results from capturing once and running a noise filter over the MPG2.  A better VRC/TBC/Capture setup and using a better CODEC would probably get better results than what I was geting.

g-force said:

something like this:

interleave(source1,source2,source3)
temporalsoften(1,255,255)
selectevery(3,1)

Yep, this was the script that I used.  Didn't know about the 25,2 bit though, will have to give that a try once I get a better capture device.

g-force said:

Also, there may be some benefit to throwing a mocomped-denoised source into the mix as well.

Sorry, didn't understand that bit at all. Umm, whats a mocomped-denoiser?


WXM: thanks for posting that 'before and after' pic.  Wow, that's imporessive stuff!  You not only removed noise but it looks like the colours are more vibrant and stable and even and the contrast is much better.  I am definitely going to have to play around with this a bit more.

Post
#321510
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
MeBeJedi said:

Just comment on how many times this project has been called "dead".

You guys might want to hold off on doing so until someone who is actually involved in the project actually says as much, ya know?


From what I understand the X0 project is on hold while a key member of the team recovers from a long term illness.
Post
#321244
Topic
STAR WARS V8 - A Final Attempt (Released)
Time
g-force said:

As for the averaging of the captures, it would be even better to do a median filter on 3 captures.


g-force said:

Even better to use 3 captures from 3 different laserdiscs to remove laser rot, but that I suspect is out of reach. I would love to help with the Avisynth scripting if you would like.


This sounds like a really good idea. Isn't this what TOOT does? Do you have any example scripts of this please G-Force? I tried averaging VHS awhile ago, but just ended up with a slightly less noisy and slightly blurier image, so I was probably doing something wrong.

Moth3r said:

Well the specs for the chip itself mention both an adaptive 3D comb filter and an adaptive 4-line (2D) comb filter. I suppose it depends on the actual card how this is implemented. The PDI uses the older Philips chip (SAA7118) and a Conexant BT878A chip as well.


Thanks for the link Moth3r. Actually, I read that exact same sheet last night before I posted the question. Just wondering if there was much difference because I seem to remember everyone raving about the PDI a few years ago and I wasn't sure if Philips had advanced/improoved the IC or just screwed around with it.
Post
#321131
Topic
STAR WARS V8 - A Final Attempt (Released)
Time
Great project.
Are you planning on transferring the discs that negative1 mentioned or just stick to the SC? Are you planning on doing any colour correction or filtering the image in any way to reduce noise etc?

Any idea how the Philips 7135 card compares with the older PDI cards that were used by other members? Are you going to modify the 7135 card and fit a BNC connector?

This sounds like a very interesting project to keep an eye on. Good luck with it dudes.
Can't wait to see some screen shots.
Post
#320561
Topic
Merry X0mas and a Happy New Year!
Time
Zion said:


Once we finally get the new article up you will know. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> Video and more screenshots are on their way guys. Merry Christmas.


Zion said:

It is mainly a cleaned up SC, but we'll get into the specifics in the article.


I can't seem to find this article anywhere on the X0 site. Did Zion post this article anywhere or could someone please send it to me? I'm sure it would be very interesting and I'd love to have a look at it.
Post
#320378
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
DarkGryphon2048 said:

Oh, wait. My mistake Orinoco.;)


No worries Mate. I'll look forward to your PM after you buy that X0 ;)

DarkGryphon2048 said:

Yeah, it does seem a bit pricey for a player.


ken-oath! A bit too pricey for me too damn it :(

Back on topic: Long ago in the thread someone kicked up a fuss about leaving the matte boxes etc and said that he never saw them in the movie theatres. I absolutely do remember seeing them the first time I saw the movie in 77/78. As far as I'm concerned they are a valid part of the original movie experience, so good on you for keeping them intact.

Also, I just noticed on the 1st page that MeBeJedi listed 3 web docs. I've only seen the 2 that were listed on the X0 site. I think it had something to do with cleaning up some frame with Luke and R2 in it. Can someone send me the 3rd webdoc or repost somewhere please?

Post
#320278
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
Ripplin said:

That's the second time you've referred to this disc. Any chance you can tell us what it actually is sometime? ;)


Sorry, I wasn't trying to be rude or build up suspense. The reason I didn't mention it was because I didn't think that this was the correct forum for talking about other LD movies in the 'SW X0 thread'. Actually, the rare LD that I have is for the '1990 Honda VTec CR-X'. It's a sort of video sales brochure for the car and is quite collectable to other CR-X'ers. It's my precious (insert best Golum voice) ... ohh dear, all this talk aof CR-X's and I think I may have put Ripplin to sleep :/

DarkGryphon2048 said:

It's so Ultra-Rare it mustn't be named! Oh, wait, maybe it's a Japanese exclusive or something?


Yes, Japanese exclusive ... it's my precious (I'm a KIWI. LOTR quotes are compulsory down here).

DarkGryphon2048 said:

And Ripplin, I'd send back both the ultra-rare LD and the DL DVD I use for it to you.


umm, it was my LD that we were talking about. Not nice to go giving my LD's away to other people like that.

skyjedi2005 said:

I saw one as new X-0 player sell for 10 thousand american dollars on ebay once


The last one I saw on Yahoo.Japan was this one: http://page5.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/e75671394
$1900 USD is pretty good and much better than what it'd go for on EBay. A bit too expensive for me and my mortgage though. Bummer! :(
Post
#320187
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
DarkGryphon2048 said:

I would buy an X0 player but it certainly wouldn't be used for any Star Wars preservations. Nah, I'd rather transfer all of those LD extras which aren't on DVD if I could. Believe me I would if I had the means to especially if I could afford it.
There are other films besides Star Wars which need to be preserved. I'd be making my own "X0 Utilised Projects" if I already had the capability and equipment.
These wouldn't be "Fan Edits" either.


I can certainly dig a lot of what you're saying and I'll agree that there is a heck of a lot of stuff that has only been released on LD or VHS which also deserves a decent preservation effort. BTW, if by any chance you do ever buy an X0 player, then please feel free to PM me and I'll send you my ultra-rare LD for preservation ;)

For myself though, Star Wars was such an important part of my childhood experience that it seems such a travesty that it hasn't had the proper DVD release that it deserves. I can certainly appreciate the efforts that the X0 team have gone too and I for one am truly amazed by their tenacity and level of expertise and I applaud their efforts. I would also recommend that you read both the old and the new X0 threads thoroughly because if nothing else, it's all a bloody good read.

As for the 'fan edits', yeah I'll agree that's not my cup of tea either. Having said that, I'm not gonna bag anyone else for getting up off their bum and spending their own time on something that they obviously enjoy doing. Good on 'em and good luck to 'em.
Post
#320166
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
DarkGryphon2048 said:

or did you guys waste your moneys only for this project?


Geez mate, that's a pretty harsh statement. I don't think I'd consider it a 'waste of money' if I was lucky enough to be able to afford and X0 player. Besides, how much money are you prepared to ‘waste’ on your own LD preservations?

DarkGryphon2048 said:

Alot of other LD's could have a highly beneficial means of preservation if utilised via the X0 player.


Yep, this is undoubtedly true. I have one LD in particular that I guarantee no one else on the forum has even heard of which I would love to get transferred from an X0 player as well. Sadly, unless you either own an X0 or are very good mates with someone who does, then I think your chances of getting anything transferred on one of those players is pretty slim.

Here’s a thought; why don’t you go out and ‘waste’ a huge amount of money on an X0 player and then offer it to the rest of us to use for our own preservations? Sounds like a pretty good idea to me :)
Post
#320017
Topic
Anyone have an x0 laserdisc player?
Time
I think Moth3r and DarthMall covered it very succinctly, but I don't think you're quite getting what they were talking about with the AC3 output on LD players.

Basically AC3 is the old name for 'Dolby Digital'. Simply put, the old AC3 (DD) signal from the LD player is not the same as the signal that comes out of a modern DVD player, although it is still DD 5.1. The signal that comes out from the LD player requires a box to 'convert' it into the modern Dolby Digital format that we use today. This will enable your old LD player to hook up to a modern surround amp or even a soundcard on your PC if it has the right SPDIF connector. This 'converter' box is called an 'AC3 RF demodulator' and these units are quite often available on EBay. The AC3(DD) signal is still 5.1 and does not get down converted to 2 channel.

A lot of older consumer level LD players and most (all?) industrial LD players including the V800/V8000/V4300D do not have the AC3 RF output plug and consequently do not give Dolby Digital. Most LD players including the industrial players can be modified to give AC3 output if required though. There used to be quite a few companies advertising on the interweb who did these mods and there are still a few of the circuit diagrams floating around. If you did decide to get an industrial LD player, then chances are that it can be modified to give AC3/DD 5.1. It might actually work out cheaper and easier though to simply buy another cheaper consumer level player which already has the AC3 RF jack plug and grab the sound from that to sync up to a decent video capture from an industrial player like the V8000. ie: use the industrial player to capture the better picture and use the consumer level player to grab the sound.

Just to confuse things a bit more, LD also had available a 16bit digital PCM 2 channel audio track which is the same quality as CD. This is primarily used on the majority of LD discs that are available. Simply put, AC3 (DD) came out of the AC3 RF jack plug and the PCM audio came out of the 'digital optical audio' connector. When they mentioned the ‘digital audio output’ in that online auction, they were talking about the 2 channel PCM audio. If you were to buy that player, then you would have to modify it to get AC3 Dolby Digital.

Don't worry about the BNC sync plugs, you aren't likely to need or use them.

Hope this helps.
Post
#318516
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
I found an old post on the old forum where Laserman had put up some pictures of the X0 vs the D925 and possibly other playersa as well. Unfortunately, it looks like those files are nolonger at the URL listed in the original post.

Could someone please repost these pics as I'd love to have a look at them for interest sake.
Post
#318513
Topic
Difference in quality of laserdisc players
Time
Yeah, I have checked those sites before, but they didn't fully answer my question.
They are great resources sites though, so thanks for posting those URLs.

I don't know how I missed it on my first search, but Laserman has already answered most of what I wanted to know ages ago on this post:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/What-PAL-NTSC-Laserdisc-players-would-you-recommend-me/post/259497/#post259497


So I guess the pecking order from best downwards is : X0, X9, V800, V8000, V4300D followed by the consumer models.

Laserman also mentioned a bit about the CLV smearing that I was referring to here:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Ghosting-problem/post/253620/#post253620


From his comments it's clear that all consumer players suffer from smearing to some extent, except the X0/X9 and some of the industrial players.

Can anyone please tell me what the V4300D player is worth today in working condition?
Post
#318412
Topic
Blank DVD's: + or - ?
Time
Thanks for posting those links.

I had similar experiences to Moth3r with aweful Princo discs. The first few that I tried which were from a mates spindle and were good. The two spindles that I bought however were completely different and were all rubbish. In all that was 3 different discs under the same brand/logo! Verbatim does this as well so I guess Forrest Gump was right 'you never know what you're gonna get' even with the big brands.

umm, and I hate to say this Moth3r, but I think there are also 'fake' discs that report a different manufacturer for their disc ID. There are aparently fake Taiyo Yuden and other media, so I guess it pays to watch out for discs that fell off the back of a truck or deals that seem 'too good to be true' etc.