logo Sign In

Moth3r

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Oct-2004
Last activity
16-Jul-2017
Posts
4,892

Post History

Post
#584052
Topic
PS78: Pre-ANH Star Wars Bootleg VHS from 1978 ***"RAW" DVD RELEASED***
Time

AntcuFaalb said:

frank678 said:

I forget, did you determine whether the light trails you see following the ships in space and following some of the motion was already present on the tape or was only in the transfer. I wonder if its on the tape whether theres a way to reduce it to a degree through post processing, when the time comes

It's not on the VHS. It's the Toshiba DVR620's fault; i.e., false MacroVision detection.

Macrovision's analogue copy protection does not cause motion trails. Sounds to me like a temporal noise reduction applied somewhere in your chain.

Post
#583933
Topic
Is the theater where you saw Star Wars still standing ?
Time

SilverWook said:

"Cineworld" looks more like a home improvement store than a movie theater! Talk about a bland exterior...

Was it AOTC, or the theater itself that put you off, Moth3r?

AoTC, definitely. I just found it so boring.

My brother and I went to see The X Files movie at Cineworld soon after it had been built, and I enjoyed that experience. I remember the sound (not sure if it was DTS, Dolby Digital or SDDS) being incredible.

Post
#583833
Topic
Is the theater where you saw Star Wars still standing ?
Time

SilverWook said:

Interesting looking theater, Moth3r. How big was it on the inside?

The Minor screen was about the size of the average home theatre room that rich bachelors build for themselves these days. And the Major was twice as big.

On reflection, I think it was slightly larger than that! But it was no 70mm 6-track venue, you understand.

This is where I saw The Phantom Menace:

Still standing, and still a cinema (I took my son to see Toy Story 3 there a couple of years ago). 100 years old next year, it is believed to be the second oldest remaining purpose built cinema in the UK. Here's what it looks like on the inside.

And this is where I saw AoTC:

An experience that put me off cinema-going for years. I watched RoTS (the workprint bootleg) on a 32" TV at home in my conservatory.

Post
#583829
Topic
Thorr's 35 mm Star Wars Trilogy SE Trailer WQHD Restoration (Part-Finished)
Time

thorr said:

After a four month hiatus, I finally started working on this again.  Here is the latest.  I used sendspace because mediafire makes you login now.  It should be blu-ray compatible, although I didn't test it on a blu-ray player.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/4na6aw

Enjoy!

Copied it onto a USB stick and it plays fine on my PS3.

Looks beautiful!

Post
#583824
Topic
Is the theater where you saw Star Wars still standing ?
Time

The building is still there, now an Indian restaurant.

Edit - some pics back then:

And now:

Edit #2 - the cinema had 2 screens, 'Major' and 'Minor'. At the time of this photo (probably around 1982) The Verdict was showing on the minor screen, and the major has a Mad Max double bill. The poster you can see on the right hand side is this one:

 

Post
#583492
Topic
Brooks's Adventures in VHS preservation (Released)
Time

Brooks said:

... (Vimeo smoothes it out a bit when streaming, at least on my computer/connection, so you can't really see the interlacing which is quite prevalent)

...

After thousands of man hours and millions of dollars spent, the scientists at Brooks laboratories have tweaked the footage in Premiere to downplay the interlacing, tone down the reddish tone and sharpen things a bit.  They also used neat video to remove some of the noise.  

Alarm bells ringing! 

The scientists at Brooks laboratories don't seem to understand certain video basics, such as the difference between interlaced video and video telecined with 3:2 pulldown.

I had an almost identical conversation with another new member just a couple of weeks ago:
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-SWOLT-ANHV8-Preservation-Project/post/580980/#TopicPost580980

Your sample plays with no audio, however the vimeo link plays with a choppiness that suggests you have not carried out an IVTC.  

Post
#583261
Topic
Info Wanted: Question about "Faces" VHS subtitles
Time

hypeiv said:

1990osu said:

Wasn't "Faces" just the VHS versions of the 1993 definitive edition master?

If that is true then why would they have made a "faces" version of the LD's?

To make more money.

The Definitive Collection was a laserdisc boxed set of the whole trilogy released in 1993. The "Faces" editions released in 1995 were available to buy individually, and I'm 99% sure they used the same master. (At one time there was a suggestion that the DVNR artefacts were not as severe on the Faces discs, but this has recently been shown to be incorrect.)

More info and links here: http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-originaltrilogycom-acronym-buster/topic/6810/

Post
#583098
Topic
STAR WARS - Special Widescreen Edition (Technidisc) (Released)
Time

Crosstalk (in the context of laserdisc) is indeed a type of interference - which is why the artefacts look similar.

In this case it's nothing to do with RF (so cable shielding won't help) but a disc mastering defect which results in the laser pickup reading a signal from an adjacent pit track that interferes with the signal from the main track.

It was discussed here:
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Smear-free-93/topic/12190/page/4/

Post
#582888
Topic
Star Wars 1997 DTS CD-ROMs (Released)
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Moth3r said:

borisanddoris said:

The DTS-6 can be made to play discs without film.  If you wanted to record from it, you'd need a proprietary analog cable (DB25) and a 5 channel recording mechanism.  I really don't think it'd be worth doing things that way.

If the ROTS discs contain the encrypted AUE files, instead of the older AUD files, then the "analogue hole" method is the only way.

They do contain the .AUE files....and I suspect that AOTC might as well.  

I think the encryption was introduced in 2004. AOTC is probably OK.