logo Sign In

Moth3r

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Oct-2004
Last activity
16-Jul-2017
Posts
4,892

Post History

Post
#245851
Topic
Info: 2006 OT DVD/Laserdisc - a comparison...
Time
It certainly looks like a vertical blur has been applied to the official DVD; there is a noticeable loss of vertical detail when compared with the laserdiscs (both the DC and the PAL laserdiscs). I don't know why this might be the case, perhaps it was done to reduce the effect of IVTC artefacts (e.g. see here)?

I think the DVD could do with some processing to remove video noise/grain, and because it has superior horizontal detail/sharpness the results should look better than any laserdisc transfer, despite the vertical blurring.

That said, there are some scenes in the PAL laserdiscs that are cleaner than the DC and the official DVD - fewer dirt spots/scratches on the print. (I'm thinking of the "flyover" shot as one example.)
Post
#245393
Topic
Help Wanted: an MP3 of the 1.0 mono mix from the pre-ANH projects?
Time
Originally posted by: Mielr
I also noticed that the voices sound sped-up. Was this because it originated from a PAL TV broadcast? Yes. There was an AC3 version I put up that ran at the correct speed (it synched up with Doctor M's NTSC DVD). I can re-upload if there's any interest.
Originally posted by: Bahax
A friend of mine claims that originally, later in the movie after Luke says, "I'm gonna use the Force ..."
The line is "Nothing. I'm alright.", and there is no response from base. Unless you're thinking of something different?

Originally posted by: Bahax
Also, is the mono mix featured on the EditDroid DVD, or any others?
Editdroid version 1 and The Starkiller bootleg. Also the mono mix is available seperately in PAL and NTSC speeds for patching the Moth3r and Doctor M DVDs.
Post
#244724
Topic
Info: 2006 GOUT DVD using 'Faces' PCM Sound?
Time
Originally posted by: Belbucus
...
is there anyway to identify an exact start point relative the video for synch purposes?
When you ripped the AC-3 off the DVD, you will probably have noticed it had a delay value specified.

Now, as far as I know you cannot specify a delay for PCM audio when authoring a DVD. So, if you take into account this delay by either padding the start with silence, or trimming a few milliseconds from the begining of the file, you will end up with audio that will line up with the video without any modification required by the end user.

Post
#244580
Topic
Star Wars Limited Edition Screen Captures.
Time
Originally posted by: Zion
Originally posted by: Moth3r
This is weird. Although the GOUT version has more horizontal detail, it looks like vertical detail has been filtered.
...
I think before we start throwing ideas around llike detail has been lost or they added grain, we need to compare the GOUT to the NTSC Definitive Collection LD, which all versions of the GOUT look to be sourced from. It's one thing to compare it to a PAL transfer or a pre-'93 transfer, and completely another to compare it to the version it actually came from. When I have time tonight or tomarrow I'll post screenshots of a DC capture, unless someone beats me to it. (hint )
Well we already have screenshots from TR47, Cowclops, DrGonzo, etc... sourced from the NTSC DC laserdiscs. Even they contain more vertical detail than the GOUT version (see R2D2 in Shot 36).

And it's not due to the NTSC->PAL scaling, because the NTSC GOUT version is just as bad.
Post
#244043
Topic
Star Wars Limited Edition Screen Captures.
Time
Originally posted by: R2D2
Missing frames for Moth3r and Zion are here:
http://rapidshare.de/files/32986405/pal_update.zip.html
Thanks, I've now uploaded these (link).

This is weird. Although the GOUT version has more horizontal detail, it looks like vertical detail has been filtered. Compare the width of the black line in shot 4:

http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3729/untitled1copyyc7.jpg

(GOUT - top, Moth3r - bottom. The increase in grain is also evident in this shot.)

So - is this loss of vertical because of the upscaling from NTSC to PAL? Please can somebody grab some comparison frames from the NTSC release?
Post
#243575
Topic
So then, PAL or NTSC GOUT for best quality?
Time
I'm guessing any difference in picture quality would be negligible (but would appreciate some sceenshots from an owner of the NTSC discs). If you live in a PAL country, you're probably marginally better off getting the PAL discs, as that is what your equipment will primarily be calibrated for.

Has the audio been pitch corrected? I've seen someone else say that it hasn't.
Post
#243567
Topic
Are the PAL GOUT DVDs upscaled from the NTSC masters?
Time
From a screenshot comparison, it appears that the PAL discs are definitley from the same master used for the NTSC laserdiscs.

However, it does seem that the DVDs do contain more picture detail than my transfers - I think screenshots I'd seen previously had been softened and did not accurately represent the quality of the DVD.

(Which is what you'd expect, as the transfer process:
D1 master -> DVD
is theoretically superior to:
D1 master -> Laserdisc -> Analogue capture -> DVD)

But the transfer process has also reproduced a fair amount of grain and noise. I'm sort of leaning towards processing the GOUT DVD for Moth3r V1.1 rather than a new laserdisc transfer, using a filter chain to remove noise and convert the image to anamorphic.

My ultimate dream for V2.0 would use colour-corrected shots from the 2004 version (which have been cleaned up without that damn ghosting), and only use the GOUT version where necessary. A sort of ultimate classic edition, if you like.
Post
#243562
Topic
Star Wars Limited Edition Screen Captures.
Time
I agree, Zion. The shots posted by R2D2 are sharper than those posted by boris, and they do seem to contain more detail than my laserdisc transfer.

I'll try to get the shots up on my page today.

Edit:

LINK

GOUT shots are now up, except for Nos. 3 and 5. (R2D2, could you possibly provide these please? Also, I think I need the preceding frame for shot 6 - compare the pattern of film dirt with the TR47 version.)

The GOUT version is clearly more detailed than any other version*. It's also evident that the picture contains more grain/noise.

* Edit: But a few scenes do look better on the PAL laserdisc transfers. See shots 22 and 24 on Zion's site.