logo Sign In

Mielr

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Jun-2006
Last activity
27-Dec-2024
Posts
2,805

Post History

Post
#328241
Topic
I have an idea for a new petition.
Time

Then, who would we send this petition to? George Lucas? Like he'd care.

 

The only thing that motivates GL now is $ and power, and those of us who didn't pay to see Clone Wars sent a very strong message that said "no more of your crap, George". That's a lot more powerful than signing a petition. The movie only made about $38,000,000 which is a lot less than he was expecting.

Post
#328166
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
negative1 said:
nohandluke said:

Nothing about the 1980 version of Empire Strikes Back sucked. It was a seminal moment in film history where everything came together in the end in complete narrative and aesthetic synergy. There are only a handful of films that can boast such perfection (e.g. Lawrence of Arabia) At the end of the day, were there a proper anamorphic DVD transfer of this original 1980 version, there would be no need for Adywan to even work on this film. As it is however, sadly, there is no proper DVD and hence Adywan must take a not-so-special edition and make it special so we can have something that is presentable on a modern home theater.

i'm sorry, but ESB was a let down for me when i saw it, i wanted to know what happened right after star wars, and it jumped ahead without filling in all the gaps... i also felt let down that it was the middle third part [i wasn't too fanatical to read that there was a plan for the third film], and didn't feel conclusive at all.... what if 'jedi' had never been made? then what? there were narrative leaps, and plot subpoints that didn't click for me ...

 

The lack of a satisfying conclusion was exactly what I loved most about ESB- it was daring, edgy, unconventional and very "UN-Hollywood".

I never doubted there would be a third film. I didn't see it until the re-release in 1982, so by then we knew they were already filming Jedi, but even in 1980, the huge success of ESB made 'part 3' a given. 

Post
#328161
Topic
The middle ground...or how I learned to relax and stop worrying where I fit in.
Time

There was a time when I would have been considered a 'hardcore' Star Wars fan- I loved every Star Wars movie, and thought George Lucas was a genius. He could do no wrong. Then came the Special Editions.....and the prequels. I was then in a position of only loving half of the Star Wars movies, and thinking I had seriously overestimated George Lucas' talent.

So, now I guess I'd be considered a "middle of the road" fan, since I don't like the prequels or the EU (I've only read 2 EU books and of those the only one I really liked was Splinter).

But, I still consider myself a hardcore fan, because to me there are still only 3 Star Wars movies and I'm a hardcore fan of those, and of the related memorabilia. 

Post
#328029
Topic
So I'm getting a dog/what pets do you have
Time
doubleofive said:

I’m considering making a bandolier so he can be mini-Chewie.  I’ll take pictures and post them to the inevitable Halloween thread.

 

 

That would be funny! :-P

Post
#327895
Topic
I'm still a little confused about this anamorphic issue.
Time
Janskeet said:

Could someone tell more the difference between letterbox and anamorphic again?

This is a very good visual comparison (pay special attention to the two photos a the bottom of the page):

http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/anamorphic/anamorphic185demo.html

 

The main point to remember is that letterboxed DVD images are essentially square(ish). They are made up of a widescreen movie image, sandwiched between two black bars that are PART of the image.

Anamorphic widescreen DVDs are rectangular in shape- like the movie image itself.

 

Post
#327753
Topic
Yet ANOTHER DVD boxed set...*sigh*
Time
Gaffer Tape said:

Well, anyway, as lukewarm as I was about the puppet they used in TPM, I think TPM was the only prequel that had the right idea about how to use Yoda.  They actually used the puppet in conjunction with a couple of shots of CG where it was needed.  It was used in a wide shot of Yoda pacing, so it actually looked like he was there walking.  Then when it closed in, it was the puppet again.  That's how I thought it should have been done.  Rather than the complete CG Yoda used in the other prequels, they should have used a puppet except where necessary.

I agree- even though the puppet was butt-ugly and looked angry (?) I prefer it over CGI Yoda.