Lord Haseo

moviefreakedmind said:

Lord Haseo said:

Well I take “It’s not as good as people says it is” as saying “I know better than everyone else” or “You should trust my opinion over most others” but that’s just me.

You can read minds though;

I don’t have to when I can just read the post.

Smithers said:

but not as awesome as everyone says it is.

we can’t and just have to assume that his comments were made in good faith.

I’m sure he didn’t have any malicious intent with that post but taken at face value the post indicates that his point of view on the film holds more weight than others. Had he said something like “I don’t feel as though this film is as good as people have led me to believe” the entire feel of the post would have been totally different even though he was essentially saying the same thing.

Well I take “It’s not as good as people says it is” as saying “I know better than everyone else” or “You should trust my opinion over most others” but that’s just me.

moviefreakedmind said:

Debates?

A couple of debates about Battle Meditation and Dark Side Degradation

The most serious of debates you see.

If you at least have a rudimentary base of knowledge about the subject you’re looking up then one should be able to discern fact from fiction. Wookiepedia has actually helped me in quite a few debates.

Smithers said:

Lord Haseo said:

Smithers said:
but not as awesome as everyone says it is.

Even though this and saying it’s overrated are pretty much the same goddamn thing I hate when people say that shit. It’s pretty much saying “Everyone else’s opinion doesn’t matter except for mine”

I liked the movie, I just think it was just overhyped. I’ll definitely buy it when it comes out and I’ll probably enjoy it more the next few times around but I was just saying that all of the youtubers giving it an A+ was a little overboard.

The general public seems to enjoy the movie a lot too.

Masochism

Jonno said:

Granted, this clearly isn’t the thread for subtleties, but there’s a difference between female characters who are portrayed by their creators as helpless and decorative (Leia and Padme at various times) being depicted as such by other artists, and those who are purposefully designed to be progressive still being mentally undressed by sweaty fanboys.

I’m pretty sure these “sweaty fanboys” among a lot of other people who aren’t even into Star Wars like we are were mentally undressing her when they saw the movie and even before that. Daisy Ridley is a beautiful girl you know…

Also just her hips are kind of exposed; it’s not like the artist was showing ass and tits. It’s more sensual than explicitly sexual. If that makes any sense lol

And what constitutes a ‘radical’ feminist anyway?

Something like this:

I tried to play MGS 3 a year ago and I was interested in the plot but the gameplay was ass.

HansiG said:

So many reaction pics to choose from.

And they’re also the same people who didn’t champion Rey for being the most competent female character in some time if not ever. I’m just saying…they’re inconsistent.

Also when I said “anyone” I meant us. As in the Star Wars fanbase.

TV’s Frink said:

Lord Haseo said:

And I’ve never heard anyone being in an uproar over this shit

Hahahahahaha

I have.

Radical Feminists excluded

And I’m pretty sure hardly anyone would have a problem with the first 3 Leia fan pictures because of the Gold Bikini in ROTJ. If you don’t have a problem with the 4th then I have bad news for you lol

EDIT:

And I’ve never heard anyone being in an uproar over this shit

Ryan-SWI said:

Lord Haseo said:

And before you say anything The God Father 2 had multiple flashbacks so let’s not even.

Who’s that directed at?

Anyone who would have said “The God Father 2 was a sequel though. What are you talking about?”

Smithers said:
but not as awesome as everyone says it is.

Even though this and saying it’s overrated are pretty much the same goddamn thing I hate when people say that shit. It’s pretty much saying “Everyone else’s opinion doesn’t matter except for mine”

And before you say anything The God Father 2 had multiple flashbacks so let’s not even.

Ryan-SWI said:

imperialscum said:
I probably will skip it. Nevertheless, I can give my opinion on this.

You can, but you can’t give an informed opinion on the entire film if you don’t see it, just make educated guesses at best.

The two are one in the same for him.

It’s just fan art; had this been official art I would completely understand how it can undermine what the character is about but it’s not that serious.

and at least it’s not this type of fan art…

disregard

Well it seems that Snoke is NOT Plagueis. Which is slightly disappointing to me but Snoke still has plenty of time to establish himself as a great villain. If Palpatine could do it in one then Snoke can surely do it in two 😃

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/939520

imperialscum said:

This film was inherently a failure. The very basic rule is that you do not meddle with OT main characters. On top of that, you simply cannot do a Han Solo film without Harrison Ford. And even if they used a time machine to make Ford young again, the film would still suck as the very basic rule is broken.

The only thing that is inherently wrong with this film is that it’s a story that doesn’t need to be told. However, that doesn’t mean it can’t be told well.

Visions From The Dark Side - Morbid Angel

Seasons In The Abyss - Slayer

Smithers said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7ie2G0TUOE

I agree that I’ll just have to trust the casting department

I’ll say that they made a great decision in not casting Miles Teller but that’s all I’ll give them

What a disaster that would have been…

suspiciouscoffee said:

My God

EDIT:

This casting choice is reminding me of when Jesse Eisenberg was casted as Lex Luthor.