- Post
- #661943
- Topic
- Movie Chains
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/661943/action/topic#661943
- Time
and he should be called Shonzie anyway.
and he should be called Shonzie anyway.
anti piracy coded? what on earth could that mean??
You can undo that, NTSC pulldown can be more destructive if not done properly...
This looks interesting, Andrea, I'm impressed at how you were able to regain some details, like the numbers in the B&W test card. I think this script could prove very useful.
Do you reckon it could also be useful for VHS ?
Bespin Luke looks like a nice figure, but he looks sad.
My lovely horsies in Minecraft
And one of my dogs sitting in front of the fireplace
Oh, we're ignorant idiots? You come here, you make it a chore for us to understand what you want, you willy nilly request footage and help from people, you spam the forum with duplicate requests, and now you insult us??... I'll tell you what, you little dummkopf, if that's going to be your attitude, you're not even welcome in Off Topic.
CP3S said:
Gaffer Tape said:
Sigh. Yes. My full name is Edmund Stanislaus Rumowicz. Lance for short. I am not ashamed.
He has a badass name and claims he is not ashamed. Of course you're not ashamed! That name is crazy badass!
If I had a name like that, I'd commission a painting of myself to hang over the mantel with a plaque with my name on it under.
Edmund Stanislaus Rumowicz, the scourge of Carpathia, the sorrow of Moldavia, commands you!
Laserschwert said:
It's interesting that there WERE French credits though. This might be an indication, that there were in fact German credits as well, which I didn't know of.
There were french credits, and there were italian credits. Why not german? :)
JEDIT wait, you weren't talking about ANH, were you?
I bent my wookiee.
Awesome ensemble, interesting arrangements. IMHO the miking on the djembe wasn't that great, to be honest, and I understand, those things are nice to hear live, but a bitch to mike.
Unlike you.
That makes two of us. I'm already balding and pudgy.
CP3S said:
Over the last couple of years I've discovered I'm really good at casual relationships, I can juggle several at once, hold their interest for pretty much as long as I want most of the time, and (usually) gracefully drop the ones that grow stale or uninteresting. But I suck at potentially serious monogamous ones. Girls will get into me real quick, become totally smitten, and when I return interest and want to pursue something, it seems to fizzle in 3 to 6 months, then I have to go out and start new casual ones because I blew all the other ones off for that one.
Been hanging out with this one girl for a month now (yeah, that's not very long) who I really click with. The other day she admitted that she stopped answering messages from the other guys she had been seeing right after meeting me because they suddenly didn't seem worth wasting time on anymore, and hasn't fooled around with anyone since. I haven't admitted it to her yet, but I've totally been dodging messages from all the other women in my life since meeting her too.
I really dig this girl, she makes it all the way down my check list on desirable features and traits so far, and we seem to want all the same things in life, but this is the point where I feel like a hopeless high schooler and have no idea how I am suppose to act from here on. I feel like if I reach over the line and admit I want to date her exclusively, we'll probably have a really fun 3 or 4 months before we realize we are just smoking filter and have to toss the butt. If I keep it casual, I bet I could still be hanging out with her for another six months or more down the road, while not having to muck around with obligations and strong feelings.
Ugh, relationships suck. But I'm kind of getting burnt out on meaningless physical activity, and kind of want someone to work towards goals with. A solid partner in crime and shenanigans who is always there.
Wow, I pity you. You WISH you were a self hating, depressed basement dweller like me. But hey, not everyone is as lucky as good ol' yours truly. ;)
[not hating on you, C3PS, this is more of a counterpoint to your words, and, let's face it, only results in adding narcissistic to my list of adjectives]
That thing is impressive.
I also recommend "Conker's Bad Fur Day".
From another thread:
Bingowings said:
TV's Frink said:
http://drawception.com/viewgame/7q4yRCjT98/gandalf-illuminates-the-long-dark-walk-moria/
I have played this game with pencil and paper (you roll it between rounds).
The longer the paper the more amusing the results (though they tend to involve penises and bees).
Best party game ever.
I've joined the site. Here's a game I just completed:
http://drawception.com/viewgame/WtfEcsMsaY/city-floating-in-the-sky/
TV's Frink said:
Harmy said:
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
DRAMATIZATION: MAY NOT HAVE HAPPENED
Oof. As if having to interpret intentions thru the written word wasn't bad enough...
I think those were 3 strip separations.
I've seen a couple of tweets about it. What's actually going on, apart from the same 3 pictures they keep posting?
Ok, that one, I missed. Unless you're channeling Ric Olié.
It actually sounds like a sensible post-prequel SE change.
Hal 9000 said:
I guess nobody liked Leonardo's joke.
Well, you know how it is, you hit, you miss. I mostly miss.
As soon as the dog on the roomba entered the frame, my mind immediately played the Imperial March. If that isn't Pavlovian conditioning, I don't know what is.