logo Sign In

Jetrell Fo

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
12-Aug-2004
Last activity
18-May-2017
Posts
6,102

Post History

Post
#1013912
Topic
The Messenger ... What, if anything, did you take away from it?
Time

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

starwarsfan236 said:

You guys are still going with this? Really? Oh boy. I figured you would have forgotten me by now.

Hey ot.com, this is the guy who made starwarsfan234. I’m sure that one of the mods could confirm my identity with an IP check.

Jetrell Fo, there was no message. I was not trying to insult you, as if you’re important enough for me to care.

Also, guess again, I’m not HansiG. The one truth I did tell last week is that I was a lurker who read the forum for about a year before joining.

Oh and feel free to ban me, mods.

I chose to see something positive in your visit. It is sad that you and most other members chose the opposite. I believe you to be a sock, and as with your previous incarnation, your identity will not be released because the person behind it does not want to be revealed as that would be breaking the rules of “no socks”. The only people that can circumvent that rule would be mods or admin. Now, I am NOT accussing mods or admin because I typed that but they are the ONLY entities here that can circumvent any rules without having to reveal themselves. The privilege of being a mod or admin at most any internet site on the planet.

I’m sure you’ll ignore this question but if you aren’t accusing modes or admin who do you think created that account?

Best I can figure, you think it’s me, having done so with mod or admin blessing. Is that right?

As I have explained before, as a regular member, I do not have access to any information that would help to determine who it is.

What I do know is that the “identity” of the other account has not been revealed publicly and I doubt this one will be. I preclude from that alone that it might be someone here and that if their identity were revealed members would be upset because of the “no sock” rule … which includes you as you had to give up your socks, so no, I don’t readily believe it is you.

I’m not asking what you know, I’m asking what you think. So you don’t think it’s me, but you think it’s another member here and that it’s done with permission from mod/admin?

I’m asking because I’m legitimately trying to understand what you are saying.

IF … and I said … IF it is someone here it would have to be done with the permission of someone that controls the membership because I believe the “no new membership” rule is still in affect at this point. Otherwise how could someone from outside become a member if we aren’t accepting any? No regular user would have that authority unless there is something I’m missing as I know I don’t have the option available in my account.

It is a reasonable assumption based on the facts, nothing more.

Registration was quietly opened up on the 13th of this month.

Post
#1013905
Topic
The Messenger ... What, if anything, did you take away from it?
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

starwarsfan236 said:

You guys are still going with this? Really? Oh boy. I figured you would have forgotten me by now.

Hey ot.com, this is the guy who made starwarsfan234. I’m sure that one of the mods could confirm my identity with an IP check.

Jetrell Fo, there was no message. I was not trying to insult you, as if you’re important enough for me to care.

Also, guess again, I’m not HansiG. The one truth I did tell last week is that I was a lurker who read the forum for about a year before joining.

Oh and feel free to ban me, mods.

I chose to see something positive in your visit. It is sad that you and most other members chose the opposite. I believe you to be a sock, and as with your previous incarnation, your identity will not be released because the person behind it does not want to be revealed as that would be breaking the rules of “no socks”. The only people that can circumvent that rule would be mods or admin. Now, I am NOT accussing mods or admin because I typed that but they are the ONLY entities here that can circumvent any rules without having to reveal themselves. The privilege of being a mod or admin at most any internet site on the planet.

I’m sure you’ll ignore this question but if you aren’t accusing modes or admin who do you think created that account?

Best I can figure, you think it’s me, having done so with mod or admin blessing. Is that right?

As I have explained before, as a regular member, I do not have access to any information that would help to determine who it is.

What I do know is that the “identity” of the other account has not been revealed publicly and I doubt this one will be. I preclude from that alone that it might be someone here and that if their identity were revealed members would be upset because of the “no sock” rule … which includes you as you had to give up your socks, so no, I don’t readily believe it is you.

I’m not asking what you know, I’m asking what you think. So you don’t think it’s me, but you think it’s another member here and that it’s done with permission from mod/admin?

I’m asking because I’m legitimately trying to understand what you are saying.

IF … and I said … IF it is someone here it would have to be done with the permission of someone that controls the membership because I believe the “no new membership” rule is still in affect at this point. Otherwise how could someone from outside become a member if we aren’t accepting any? No regular user would have that authority unless there is something I’m missing as I know I don’t have the option available in my account.

It is a reasonable assumption based on the facts, nothing more.

Post
#1013898
Topic
The Messenger ... What, if anything, did you take away from it?
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

starwarsfan236 said:

You guys are still going with this? Really? Oh boy. I figured you would have forgotten me by now.

Hey ot.com, this is the guy who made starwarsfan234. I’m sure that one of the mods could confirm my identity with an IP check.

Jetrell Fo, there was no message. I was not trying to insult you, as if you’re important enough for me to care.

Also, guess again, I’m not HansiG. The one truth I did tell last week is that I was a lurker who read the forum for about a year before joining.

Oh and feel free to ban me, mods.

I chose to see something positive in your visit. It is sad that you and most other members chose the opposite. I believe you to be a sock, and as with your previous incarnation, your identity will not be released because the person behind it does not want to be revealed as that would be breaking the rules of “no socks”. The only people that can circumvent that rule would be mods or admin. Now, I am NOT accussing mods or admin because I typed that but they are the ONLY entities here that can circumvent any rules without having to reveal themselves. The privilege of being a mod or admin at most any internet site on the planet.

I’m sure you’ll ignore this question but if you aren’t accusing modes or admin who do you think created that account?

Best I can figure, you think it’s me, having done so with mod or admin blessing. Is that right?

As I have explained before, as a regular member, I do not have access to any information that would help to determine who it is.

What I do know is that the “identity” of the other account has not been revealed publicly and I doubt this one will be. I conclude from that alone that it might be someone here and that if their identity were revealed members would be upset because of the “no sock” rule … which includes you as you had to give up your socks, so no, I don’t readily believe it is you.

Could it be you? Sure it could. Could it be me? Of course but I still have no need for a sock/dummy account. It could technically be anyone here because as far as I know we are still not accepting new members.

Now, that “could” also imply that someone was allowed in around that rule, and allowed to post long enough to cause issue. We end up coming back to the possibility of it being a mod or admin as they might be the only ones to circumvent said rule. “IF” that might be the case, it is another reason no identity would be revealed.

It is all conjecture based on the available facts, for me anyways.

Post
#1013870
Topic
The Messenger ... What, if anything, did you take away from it?
Time

starwarsfan236 said:

You guys are still going with this? Really? Oh boy. I figured you would have forgotten me by now.

Hey ot.com, this is the guy who made starwarsfan234. I’m sure that one of the mods could confirm my identity with an IP check.

Jetrell Fo, there was no message. I was not trying to insult you, as if you’re important enough for me to care.

Also, guess again, I’m not HansiG. The one truth I did tell last week is that I was a lurker who read the forum for about a year before joining.

Oh and feel free to ban me, mods.

I chose to see something positive in your visit. It is sad that you and most other members chose the opposite. I believe you to be a sock, and as with your previous incarnation, your identity will not be released because the person behind it does not want to be revealed as that would be breaking the rules of “no socks”. The only people that can circumvent that rule would be mods or admin. Now, I am NOT accussing mods or admin because I typed that but they are the ONLY entities here that can circumvent any rules without having to reveal themselves. The privilege of being a mod or admin at most any internet site on the planet.

Glad you’re back. Frink’s trolling is tiresome. We need something new.

That is my belief regardless of how hammered I get over it.

Post
#1013573
Topic
The "TV's Frink (AKA The Real Ric Olie) vs. the Infinite Fos" Thread
Time

Tyrphanax said:

Yeah let’s keep this all confined to here because I’m really pretty tired of it spilling over into other threads.

Politics I can ignore, but I’d rather not have to ignore Off-Topic entirely.

I would prefer that if it has to happen this should be where it stays. What I know for sure is that my friend Mr. Frink does not appreciate being contained and regardless of whether I post elsewhere or not, him and others will make all the cracks they can in other threads, I will just have to try harder to avoid the issue in other threads all together.

Post
#1013570
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

What the fuck.

https://holidayhole.com/

People, give your money to charity, not this joke that has somehow earned $80,000 so far.

Q:Why aren’t you giving all this money to charity?

A:Why aren’t YOU giving all this money to charity? It’s your money.

Fuck you, assholes.

How do we know it’s not going to charity in the end?

At this point, nobody knows.

I believe this is tied to the questionable GoFundMe recount campaign of Jill Stein. In other words, at least your donation to these people will get a hole dug, while donating to Jill Stein will get you nothing for your money. Either way your donation doesn’t accomplish anything real important. It also parallels a lot of issues people have with donating to charities in general as one never knows where the money really goes. It could also be a silent reference to the Clinton Foundation.

It’s anyone’s guess really.

Post
#1013536
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

doubleKO said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Yes, the problem is all of us and not one of you. Sounds reasonable.

This was not my point. My point was that other people and not just myself should find a way to stop your mindless trolling of anyone you believe needs to be trolled to the brink of extinction.

Let me put it another way for you: The problem is you. That’s the reason other people aren’t trying to find a way to stop Frink’s “mindless trolling”. Many of us (myself included) wish that Frink could rise above your inane whinging and just ignore you, but he can’t resist an easy target. Your inane whinging and stunted sense of humour make you the easiest target there is.

I would trade you for a dozen ImperialScums or DarthIds.

Frink has been “mindless trolling” long before I came to off topic. No-one stopped him then so your point is moot. He is a known troll and I don’t appreciate your suggestion that there is only one person to blame. Jay said it himself … Frink gets away with quite a bit here … and he wasn’t lying. Frink has told people to die and it goes un-noticed so if you’re going to point fingers remember to look at the 3 pointing back at you.

I will not respond to this anymore. This thread shouldn’t be soiled anymore than it already has been by this nonsense.

Post
#1013532
Topic
The Messenger ... What, if anything, did you take away from it?
Time

Possessed said:

Jetrell Fo said:

maybe the rest of you doing it because you think it’s so damn funny when you say it should stop as well.

Warbler s… oh, nevermind.

And I only jest Warbler. And really I only jest to you Jetrell as well. Merely a good natured ribbing. Although I do think you take this forum way too personally.

I appreciate you saying it. The “delete my account” request is starting to look better to me all the time lately. It’s sad that anyone should even get to the point they feel this way.

The post below is the kind of crap around here that just irks the f*&k out of me. Antagonizing other members just for the sake of doing so is counter-productive and a waste.

doubleKO said:

The proliferation of “children” around here was supposedly going to stop you from posting as much. If only…

Post
#1013530
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

Swazzy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Swazzy said:

Fo-win’s law: in which every conversation will eventually become about Frink being a jerk.

WTF is wrong with you people? The discussion was specific and all you are doing is antagonizing Frink to go farther and farther.

Why do we show support to members known for trolling others instead of trying to show support for each other as a site?

Just makin’ a joke, mate. You guys’ arguments are your own.

I’m sorry for snappin. It’s not your fault. I get tired of other members joining in on the slap-fest, not because they should, but because they can.

My apologies Swazzy.

Post
#1013477
Topic
[fill in the blank] Just Died!
Time

SilverWook said:

To be fair, he didn’t have a chance to edit his post before I locked the thread.

To be fair, I didn’t either, no-one did. It doesn’t change the fact that he said it and it isn’t the first time he has done so.

TV’s Frink said:

I deleted the post because apparently Fo misinterpreted it. I understand why because words can mean anything.

You deleted it because you “apparently” misread something and your “words can mean anything” bs can just stop. You continue to antagonize and no-one says a word about it. Trolling me with stupid stuff doesn’t change your ignorant behavior.

Post
#1013470
Topic
The "TV's Frink (AKA The Real Ric Olie) vs. the Infinite Fos" Thread
Time

TV’s Frink said:

If you must know I misread what you wrote and thought you were saying another shitty thing about my parenting and my kids, like when you said my parents beat me and that’s why I probably beat my kids. When I realized I misread your post I edited out my response.

I never stated your parents beat you. I also don’t believe you misread my post. It was pretty simple and straightforward. It was also a sentence by itself.

Anyways, you said I should die, this is not the first time you’ve said it to me. The fact that you have said it more than once without getting at least a temporary ban should prove to anyone who doubts that you receive special treatment above and beyond what Jay said about you “getting away with a lot of things” here.

When I apologize for a mistake I am still the butt of jokes by numerous members here, yet it’s okay when you do it, it makes me sick.

Post
#1013457
Topic
The "TV's Frink (AKA The Real Ric Olie) vs. the Infinite Fos" Thread
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I take some offense to this thread. If Frink cannot control what comes out of his mouth that is his problem, not mine. Telling people to literally go die is not something that should either be encouraged or thought of as humorous.

All I meant was that you are a good dude.

That is clearly not what you meant.

But words mean whatever one wants, so that’s what I say it meant.

Since you are obviously mocking me, that alone, is proof that you meant I should die. That should at least be worth a temporary ban.

Post
#1013454
Topic
Frederick G. Nolan July 5, 1927 - June 4, 2016
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

um, we have a thread for these sort of things.

The thread is locked, if you hadn’t noticed.

Not only that, but someone dying months ago wouldn’t really count as “[fill in the blank] Just Died!” anyway.

Sure it would. I just found out about it today. I had no idea. I do not believe that there is a special criteria about posting on someone’s recent passing. If there is it is news to me.

See?!?!

TV’s Frink said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

um, we have a thread for these sort of things.

The thread is locked, if you hadn’t noticed.

Not only that, but someone dying months ago wouldn’t really count as “[fill in the blank] Just Died!” anyway.

You’ll have to forgive him, he has a definition of Just that no one else has.

You can’t not antagonize can you? Keep it up … let’s get another thread locked because you just can’t stop this kind of BS.

Post
#1013452
Topic
Frederick G. Nolan July 5, 1927 - June 4, 2016
Time

ray_afraid said:

Jetrell Fo said:

ray_afraid said:

Jetrell Fo said:
R.I.P. Mr. Nolan

Seems rude…

WTF is your problem? One thread just got locked because of bullshit like this. Why antagonize? I was sincere when I voiced my support for you. I still do support your recovery and continued good health. I am asking politely that if you were sincere about accepting people’s support, that you please stop knocking me to help make things worse.

Thank you.

I really don’t know what you’re talking about here.

You are correct, my apologies. I was trying to post too much at once and wasn’t paying attention.

I did mean this …

WTF is your problem? One thread just got locked because of bullshit like this. Why antagonize?