- Post
- #1043779
- Topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1043779/action/topic#1043779
- Time
President Obama set the stage for this style of White House. This is not the old rodeo we are used to that’s for sure.
This user has been banned.
President Obama set the stage for this style of White House. This is not the old rodeo we are used to that’s for sure.
How I get on occassion.
😃
I wasn’t insulting anybody but my adolescent self.
I wasn’t either, we all can relate, that was the message. 😉
http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Possessed-Return-of-the-Jedi-Resurrected/id/11665
I haven’t updated the change list or bumped the thread yet, I will when I have more to share.
As you can see my first encounter with frink didn’t go well, in my defense I was like a sophomore in high school at the time.
If you wanted a reason to feel old, frink, I was a high school freshman when I first started >posting here and now I live by myself at 23.
Somethings get better with time, some never change, but age ain’t got nothing to do with it.
LOL
😃
You’ll always find a few passed out somewhere on the floor the morning after.
😃
Note: This does not include booze or tobacco or medicine type shit.
- Marijuana
- Acid
- Hash
- DMT
- Ecstasy
- Whip-its
- Cocaine
- Mushrooms
- Heroin
- Meth
Drugs I still haven’t done, will update the ranking once that has been achieved:
Mescaline, PCP, crack, opium, ketamine, salvia, other shit I’m too high to remember.
Peyote didn’t make the list? Wow. Weird to see whip-its up there. Haven’t heard about that in ages. You did list Mescaline but you weren’t specific about which form, LOL.
😃
http://abc7chicago.com/news/mass-mooning-planned-at-chicagos-trump-tower/1736784/
that is the type of activism that one can really get behind.
Even I would join in on this.
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Kuwait-impose-an-entry-ban-on-Iranian-and-Pakistani-citizens
http://www.visit-kuwait.com/858-Kuwait-lifts-family-entry-ban-on-nationals-from-six-countries.html
Looks like Kuwait is living in interesting times too.
What a shame. I’m sorry to see your thread got soiled possessed. You recovered it nicely.
Okay, but we can still say someone’s acting like a regular Sean Spicer though, right?
As long as their name really is Sean Spicer.
Well done Spuff, well done.
😃
Ok. Nobody calls anyone Sean Spicer. Unless your real name is Sean Spicer…
I have to admit that I laughed too. Serious with a side of sweet.
😃
That’s a really great design. Far better than anything I could do.
😃
^ 😦
Goodnight folks. This crap has tired me out and I’m no longer in a favorable mood because of it.
Is comparing someone to Sean Spicer name calling? Meditate on this I will…
#6. Do not harass other members, either publicly or via PM. Any unwanted contact after a request to stay away will be considered harassment.
I applaud hard rule #6.
Thank you!
I asked him to stop and he did not. Meditate on that as well please. Thank you.
http://www.theonion.com/article/fearful-americans-stockpiling-facts-federal-govern-55219
And they say satire is dead in this administration.
That is funny as hell.
😃
Her husband is an advisor, she is not.
Then what in hell was she doing in that meeting.
Maybe those that are married were all invited to & allowed to bring their wives/partners? Maybe this is acutally picture from the dinner and not the actual meeting where partners/wives aren’t allowed? I don’t see anything going on that isn’t supposed to be going on.
Then you are blind.
You would be mistaken because if I can respond to what you said I can read and see the picture just fine. If you’ve got actual proof that this picture shows impropriety, bring it. If you don’t you’ve got nothing except empty digs at me.
I maintain that you blind and are extremely biased in favor of Trump. I’d like to say more of what I think about you, but that would violate the rules.
You just did, a second time.
I don’t think I have.
My name on this board is JetrellFo, not what you changed it to. This is the third time you’ve done something like this to me trying to be funny. It is not, nor is it an opinion, it is purposeful and I don’t appreciate it.
Then stop acting like Trump’s spokesperson.
Again, I will say this only once, please stop. I don’t need or want to be harassed by you for something I’m not doing or being. Harassment as you know is also against the rules and I’ve been nice about it. Things have been better around here and I’d like to see it stay that way. If you don’t stop, I will report you for harassment and be done with you.
This is my last word to you on the matter.
In the interest of fairness here’s a piece in The Atlantic arguing that Trump shouldn’t be blamed for Yemen.
This raid, according to The New York Times, was approved by and recommended to the president by his secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For the recommendation to have gone forward to the president, the senior leadership of the Department of Defense would have signed off on this operation. And for that to have happened, special operations and regional U.S. commanders would have had to have blessed the planning that went into the operation itself.
The left cannot on the one hand claim Donald Trump is ignorant of military and security affairs, and then on the other hand expect him to second-guess the professional recommendations of his uniformed and civilian military leadership.
Then again, he also goes on to defend Hillary for Benghazi, so maybe no one will agree with this article.
I say this will all due respect, no argument intended. I argued this exact point a few pages back and it didn’t fly with anyone. As for Hillary Clinton and Benghazi, I cannot say with 100% certainty, but with my military experience I can say that she did not head the Department of State well enough to save Christopher Stevens and the others who died at Benghazi. I believe if she was more on top of things, she could have.
Her husband is an advisor, she is not.
Then what in hell was she doing in that meeting.
Maybe those that are married were all invited to & allowed to bring their wives/partners? Maybe this is acutally picture from the dinner and not the actual meeting where partners/wives aren’t allowed? I don’t see anything going on that isn’t supposed to be going on.
Then you are blind.
You would be mistaken because if I can respond to what you said I can read and see the picture just fine. If you’ve got actual proof that this picture shows impropriety, bring it. If you don’t you’ve got nothing except empty digs at me.
I maintain that you blind and are extremely biased in favor of Trump. I’d like to say more of what I think about you, but that would violate the rules.
You just did, a second time.
I don’t think I have.
Here’s a little flashback for you.
Back door name calling is still name calling. So knock it off.
Any of it ring a bell warbler? Now please, stop.
Thank you.
Her husband is an advisor, she is not.
Then what in hell was she doing in that meeting.
Maybe those that are married were all invited to & allowed to bring their wives/partners? Maybe this is acutally picture from the dinner and not the actual meeting where partners/wives aren’t allowed? I don’t see anything going on that isn’t supposed to be going on.
Then you are blind.
You would be mistaken because if I can respond to what you said I can read and see the picture just fine. If you’ve got actual proof that this picture shows impropriety, bring it. If you don’t you’ve got nothing except empty digs at me.
I maintain that you blind and are extremely biased in favor of Trump. I’d like to say more of what I think about you, but that would violate the rules.
You just did, a second time.
I don’t think I have.
My name on this board is JetrellFo, not what you changed it to. This is the third time you’ve done something like this to me trying to be funny. It is not, nor is it an opinion, it is purposeful and I don’t appreciate it.
I hope they get the Immigration Policy sorted so that it benefits and protects all Americans and people legally allowed to be here. Good to see the Constitution at work.
Her husband is an advisor, she is not.
Then what in hell was she doing in that meeting.
Maybe those that are married were all invited to & allowed to bring their wives/partners? Maybe this is acutally picture from the dinner and not the actual meeting where partners/wives aren’t allowed? I don’t see anything going on that isn’t supposed to be going on.
Then you are blind.
You would be mistaken because if I can respond to what you said I can read and see the picture just fine. If you’ve got actual proof that this picture shows impropriety, bring it. If you don’t you’ve got nothing except empty digs at me.
I maintain that you blind and are extremely biased in favor of Trump. I’d like to say more of what I think about you, but that would violate the rules.
You just did, a second time.
Anyways, to take a link from one of Frink’s favorite reliable news sources … this is why she was there. Nothing illegal either.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/ivanka-trump-women-workplace-234581
And look, it was a dinner at her house, LOL.
On Thursday night, President Donald Trump’s eldest daughter hosted a dinner party with a group of CEOs at her new Kalorama home—the stated purpose, according to two attendees, was for Ivanka Trump to solicit ideas on how to promote women in the workforce and fight for issues like paid maternity leave.
CNN pictures sure are reliable aren’t they?
^It’s a fasting luncheon, can’t you tell? 😉
Just finished to watch the raw LD capture, along with BD audio… well, it’s waaay better than BD; I thought skin tones could be too yellow but, a part few shots where indeed they are, in all the others they have the right colors - reflecting the lights, water etc. colors; even if skin color in the BD is natural, it should be not, as they are not scenes where there is natural light… also, on LD all that magenta is gone, so every light flash, explosion, fire etc. has its own, proper color, and not all the same magenta blanket…
I believe I sent Doombot the cinema DTS audio. You might want to pm him to see if he’s got it synched yet.
^I said the word “maybe” clearly twice in my response to warbler. I said it because I did not know why she was there, just like you don’t.
Your little jab is about as important to me as your ego is.
LOL