Jetrell Fo

TV’s Frink said:

I’m not the so-called president.

Pot calling the kettle black is just that and one need not be the president for it to apply to them.

😉

TV’s Frink said:

Thank god we have a so-called president who lashes out immediately instead of being rational. Exactly what we need.

Funny you say this because you did the same thing before finding out about the morning edition.

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Reminds me of how Trump and Hillary were supposedly basically the same. Um, no, they’re two very different things.

They’re both clowns, that makes them the same in my book.

False Equivalence™

Religious Interpretation™

😉

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jesus Christ, is he trolling? An idiot? Suffering from dementia? All of the above?

well we can rule out the first one. i wasn’t sure for quite a while, but i think we can now safely say that Donald Trump is not, in fact, Jesus Christ.

He could never have been because if I remember my Bible reading correctly, Jesus was not a white guy, LOL.

U.S. politics can’t be take it seriously because the focus is on left vs right extremes, there’s no logical, middle ground explored.

Here is what’s happening in my hometown.

https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-milwaukee-arrests-16-during-operation-targeting-criminal-aliens

Tyrphanax said:

Jetrell Fo said:

With the FBI still having 1,000 open investigations on the books (which has also been made public and mentioned by me numerous times) makes it just as tough and those were set up based on the previous administrations policy.

Don’t you think we should finish getting these investigations finished before creating a far bigger back log?

I looked for a while tonight and couldn’t find an article about thousands of open investigations at the FBI… on immigrants? On potential immigrants? If you have a link, I’ll take a look at it (bonus points if it’s from the FBI itself). But if the FBI is suspicious of someone, I assume the case stays open until they find solid evidence one way or another. It’s tough to close a case (and I’d say that’s a good thing), especially if the person you’re suspicious about hasn’t really shown up on the radar yet.

I can give you this …

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/22/us/fbi-terror-ahmad-khan-rahami.html?_r=0

And a blurb from it …

The threat has only grown since Sept. 11, 2001, and more recently with the rise of the Islamic State. In recent years, the F.B.I. has averaged 10,000 assessments annually, and 7,000 to 10,000 preliminary or full investigations involving international terrorism. In addition, the F.B.I. receives tens of thousands of terrorism tips. All of those have to be tracked down, as in the case involving Mr. Rahami. That does not include information the F.B.I. learns from foreign partners, war zones or American agencies. Most investigations never end in prosecution.

In the meantime, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department have prosecuted more than 100 cases involving the Islamic State. Officials say those are the cases that the public tends to overlook, as well as all the other plots they have stopped.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/4/obama-administration-fails-to-check-immigrants-aga/

http://www.politifact.com/florida/article/2017/jan/27/donald-trump-says-fbi-investigating-more-people-ev/

It’s been knocked clear outta here.

😉

dahmage said:

Jetrell Fo said:

dahmage said:

Handman said:

Jetrell Fo said:

dahmage said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Handman said:

In addition, the new trend of not wearing socks with shoes is stupid.

Where on Earth is that a new trend? LOL

mostly concentrated on the green and brownish bits. never really caught on in the bluey whiteish areas.

Weird because I know white people (presumably that is what your comment is referrencing) that do this.

I think he was referencing the parts of the Earth not covered in water or snow/ice.

Handman gets the prize. the prize is pride.

My mistake. I missed it. Go make the post in the correct thread so you can claim your pride.

😃

we have a pride prize thread?

And it looks like Frink is welcoming you to post it in his prize thread … go on now, get that medal tiger, you earned it.

😉

With the FBI still having 1,000 open investigations on the books (which has also been made public and mentioned by me numerous times) makes it just as tough and those were set up based on the previous administrations policy.

Don’t you think we should finish getting these investigations finished before creating a far bigger back log?

I feel horrible for the refugees as well. I can’t imagine what it’s like to be them. It’s not their fault that their numbers are infiltrated by those that only care about harming people. They blend in to gain the communities trust but all the while their reason for coming is far different from those who want a new and safe life. I get that. I guess this administration wants to vet them before they hit U.S. soil and not after.

Some of you talk like this is such an easy fix by blaming it on Trump and wanting to oust him for it. He’s inherited the previous administrations baggage left behind just as each President before him has while wanting to do what he can. Is he perfect, are any of us actually perfect, no. There is plenty of finger pointing to go around if we really want to get down to it in this and every other country on the planet.

There is no exacting and clear solution especially if some people want action right now. It’s only going to get more fecked up if things aren’t done as properly as they can be and in a timely enough manner. We do not live in the 50’s anymore. We live in a Digital Burger King era. Everyone wants everything their way right away as fast as possible. There is no regard for the consequences of this mentality.

TV’s Frink said:

Tyrphanax said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

https://twitter.com/ProduKtJRG/status/829839180897406977?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet

@realDonaldTrump you have over 3000 pending lawsuits. Everyone has seen you in court.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/829846842150096896

I’m no Hillary fan, but brutal.

Here’s the full decision:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3457898/2-9-17-9th-Circuit-Order.pdf

Here’s an important bit from it:

The States argue that the Executive Order violates the Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument, the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban” as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b) and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims.

Of course what is overlooked is the fact that the list was created during and by the Obama administration. I am not in favor of a Muslim Ban. I do think our vetting system is broken when it comes to obtaining real information for the investigations they use for vetting.

Creating a list of countries to keep an eye on because they are of greater risk than others for terrorist threats and taking steps towards creating a ban against people from predominantly Muslim countries are two very different things.

Reminds me of how Trump and Hillary were supposedly basically the same. Um, no, they’re two very different things.

They’re both clowns, that makes them the same in my book.

Tyrphanax said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

https://twitter.com/ProduKtJRG/status/829839180897406977?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet

@realDonaldTrump you have over 3000 pending lawsuits. Everyone has seen you in court.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/829846842150096896

I’m no Hillary fan, but brutal.

Here’s the full decision:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3457898/2-9-17-9th-Circuit-Order.pdf

Here’s an important bit from it:

The States argue that the Executive Order violates the Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument, the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban” as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b) and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims.

Of course what is overlooked is the fact that the list was created during and by the Obama administration. I am not in favor of a Muslim Ban. I do think our vetting system is broken when it comes to obtaining real information for the investigations they use for vetting.

Creating a list of countries to keep an eye on because they are of greater risk than others for terrorist threats and taking steps towards creating a ban against people from predominantly Muslim countries are two very different things.

Something else not accounted for. The FBI has already stated publicly that large numbers of these refugees aren’t even native to said countries on the list they say they come from so they cannot get the proper information to clear them via the process.

dahmage said:

Handman said:

Jetrell Fo said:

dahmage said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Handman said:

In addition, the new trend of not wearing socks with shoes is stupid.

Where on Earth is that a new trend? LOL

mostly concentrated on the green and brownish bits. never really caught on in the bluey whiteish areas.

Weird because I know white people (presumably that is what your comment is referrencing) that do this.

I think he was referencing the parts of the Earth not covered in water or snow/ice.

Handman gets the prize. the prize is pride.

My mistake. I missed it. Go make the post in the correct thread so you can claim your pride.

😃

TV’s Frink said:

dahmage said:

Handman said:

Jetrell Fo said:

dahmage said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Handman said:

In addition, the new trend of not wearing socks with shoes is stupid.

Where on Earth is that a new trend? LOL

mostly concentrated on the green and brownish bits. never really caught on in the bluey whiteish areas.

Weird because I know white people (presumably that is what your comment is referrencing) that do this.

I think he was referencing the parts of the Earth not covered in water or snow/ice.

Handman gets the prize. the prize is pride.

I don’t think people should win pride for understanding the obvious, but I’ll allow it this once.

WRONG THREAD

I’d say it’s more panoramic thinking.

TV’s Frink said:

Hey look at that, words mean things.

Only when they suit the agenda of the person making such an observation.

😉

Tyrphanax said:

TV’s Frink said:

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

https://twitter.com/ProduKtJRG/status/829839180897406977?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet

@realDonaldTrump you have over 3000 pending lawsuits. Everyone has seen you in court.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/829846842150096896

I’m no Hillary fan, but brutal.

Here’s the full decision:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3457898/2-9-17-9th-Circuit-Order.pdf

Here’s an important bit from it:

The States argue that the Executive Order violates the Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument, the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban” as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b) and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims.

Of course what is overlooked is the fact that the list was created during and by the Obama administration. I am not in favor of a Muslim Ban. I do think our vetting system is broken when it comes to obtaining real information for the investigations they use for vetting.

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Here is something that should make you Trump haters happy.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/9/anne-mahlum-solidcore-founder-suggests-first-daugh/

I’m dubious she could anonymously join a workout gym and not be recognized. And the headline is a tad misleading to begin with. She seems to want a dialog with Ivnaka, not show her the door.

Why make it public then?

Unless I’m reading it wrong, she was responding to reports Ivanka was using her gym. She didn’t break the story, someone already knew about it.

I believe the story originated from the FB posts she made about it.

Ok. I’m not spelunking into the Facebook abyss to look for it. Why Ivanka wants to use a public gym when she probably can use one on any Trump property for free makes little sense. Even third tier celebs can’t scratch their butt in public without the paparazzi finding out. She was bound to be recognized sooner or later.

It might be a violation of a gym’s terms of service to sign up under a fake name anyway?

I didn’t expect you to, it says it in the article anyways. Maybe the class she took was recommended by someone. We don’t get that part of the story. I just feel that the owner really didn’t have any reason to publicize the issue any. Unless she’s using it as a marketing tool for her gym in some way alongside a political angle. That is all I can figure.

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Here is something that should make you Trump haters happy.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/9/anne-mahlum-solidcore-founder-suggests-first-daugh/

I’m dubious she could anonymously join a workout gym and not be recognized. And the headline is a tad misleading to begin with. She seems to want a dialog with Ivnaka, not show her the door.

Why make it public then?

Unless I’m reading it wrong, she was responding to reports Ivanka was using her gym. She didn’t break the story, someone already knew about it.

I believe the story originated from the FB posts she made about it.

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Here is something that should make you Trump haters happy.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/9/anne-mahlum-solidcore-founder-suggests-first-daugh/

I’m dubious she could anonymously join a workout gym and not be recognized. And the headline is a tad misleading to begin with. She seems to want a dialog with Ivnaka, not show her the door.

Why make it public then?

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

Jetrell Fo said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/us/arizona-guadalupe-garcia-de-rayos-protests/index.html

ICE: Case worked its way through system.

ICE officials, however, said the case had been working its way through the system and that the time for Garcia de Rayos to be deported had come. “Ms. Garcia’s immigration case underwent review at multiple levels of the immigration court system, including the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the judges held she did not have a legal basis to remain in the U.S.,” ICE said in a statement. “ICE will continue to focus on identifying and removing individuals with felony convictions who have final orders of removal issued by the nation’s immigration courts.”

Wait, I thought CNN was fake news?

I saw the story on the news first and it reported the same facts. Is that a problem?