logo Sign In

Jetrell Fo

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
12-Aug-2004
Last activity
18-May-2017
Posts
6,102

Post History

Post
#1070017
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

said:

TV’s Frink said:

said:

TV’s Frink said:

said:

TV’s Frink said:

And here’s the transcript.

https://apnews.com/c810d7de280a47e88848b0ac74690c83/Transcript-of-AP-interview-with-Trump?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP_Politics

TRUMP: No I have, it’s interesting, I have, seem to get very high ratings. I definitely. You know Chris Wallace had 9.2 million people, it’s the highest in the history of the show. I have all the ratings for all those morning shows. When I go, they go double, triple. Chris Wallace, look back during the Army-Navy football game, I did his show that morning.

AP: I remember, right.

TRUMP: It had 9.2 million people. It’s the highest they’ve ever had. On any, on air, (CBS “Face the Nation” host John) Dickerson had 5.2 million people. It’s the highest for “Face the Nation” or as I call it, “Deface the Nation.” It’s the highest for “Deface the Nation” since the World Trade Center. Since the World Trade Center came down. It’s a tremendous advantage.

I read the article and the transcript. Trump is not slamming 9/11, quite the opposite, he is showing that more people are interested in the crap reporting than they were with 9/11. And sadly, he is correct to say that it has bee a benefit to him. In fact, it helped get him elected, and they still can’t stop complaining instead of fixing what they did wrong to get him there.

You are truly amazing.

I get that you’re laughing at me, but why? This is a slap at the media, and the media did help him win, not 9/11. There is a method to the madness and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to think up the method.

I’m not laughing at you, I just can’t believe the things you think you’ve read when it’s plainly clear he’s simply bragging about ratings, and doing so with a despicable comparison to the ratings from coverage of 9/11.

Why do you believe there is only one possible interpretation of what he said?

I give up.

Post
#1069891
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

And here’s the transcript.

https://apnews.com/c810d7de280a47e88848b0ac74690c83/Transcript-of-AP-interview-with-Trump?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP_Politics

TRUMP: No I have, it’s interesting, I have, seem to get very high ratings. I definitely. You know Chris Wallace had 9.2 million people, it’s the highest in the history of the show. I have all the ratings for all those morning shows. When I go, they go double, triple. Chris Wallace, look back during the Army-Navy football game, I did his show that morning.

AP: I remember, right.

TRUMP: It had 9.2 million people. It’s the highest they’ve ever had. On any, on air, (CBS “Face the Nation” host John) Dickerson had 5.2 million people. It’s the highest for “Face the Nation” or as I call it, “Deface the Nation.” It’s the highest for “Deface the Nation” since the World Trade Center. Since the World Trade Center came down. It’s a tremendous advantage.

I read the article and the transcript. Trump is not slamming 9/11, quite the opposite, he is showing that more people are interested in the crap reporting than they were with 9/11. And sadly, he is correct to say that it has bee a benefit to him. In fact, it helped get him elected, and they still can’t stop complaining instead of fixing what they did wrong to get him there.

You are truly amazing.

I get that you’re laughing at me, but why? This is a slap at the media, and the media did help him win, not 9/11. There is a method to the madness and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to think up the method.

I’m not laughing at you, I just can’t believe the things you think you’ve read when it’s plainly clear he’s simply bragging about ratings, and doing so with a despicable comparison to the ratings from coverage of 9/11.

Why do you believe there is only one possible interpretation of what he said?

Post
#1069860
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

And here’s the transcript.

https://apnews.com/c810d7de280a47e88848b0ac74690c83/Transcript-of-AP-interview-with-Trump?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP_Politics

TRUMP: No I have, it’s interesting, I have, seem to get very high ratings. I definitely. You know Chris Wallace had 9.2 million people, it’s the highest in the history of the show. I have all the ratings for all those morning shows. When I go, they go double, triple. Chris Wallace, look back during the Army-Navy football game, I did his show that morning.

AP: I remember, right.

TRUMP: It had 9.2 million people. It’s the highest they’ve ever had. On any, on air, (CBS “Face the Nation” host John) Dickerson had 5.2 million people. It’s the highest for “Face the Nation” or as I call it, “Deface the Nation.” It’s the highest for “Deface the Nation” since the World Trade Center. Since the World Trade Center came down. It’s a tremendous advantage.

I read the article and the transcript. Trump is not slamming 9/11, quite the opposite, he is showing that more people are interested in the crap reporting than they were with 9/11. And sadly, he is correct to say that it has bee a benefit to him. In fact, it helped get him elected, and they still can’t stop complaining instead of fixing what they did wrong to get him there.

You are truly amazing.

I get that you’re laughing at me, but why? This is a slap at the media, and the media did help him win, not 9/11. There is a method to the madness and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to think up the method.

Post
#1069811
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

TV’s Frink said:

And here’s the transcript.

https://apnews.com/c810d7de280a47e88848b0ac74690c83/Transcript-of-AP-interview-with-Trump?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP_Politics

TRUMP: No I have, it’s interesting, I have, seem to get very high ratings. I definitely. You know Chris Wallace had 9.2 million people, it’s the highest in the history of the show. I have all the ratings for all those morning shows. When I go, they go double, triple. Chris Wallace, look back during the Army-Navy football game, I did his show that morning.

AP: I remember, right.

TRUMP: It had 9.2 million people. It’s the highest they’ve ever had. On any, on air, (CBS “Face the Nation” host John) Dickerson had 5.2 million people. It’s the highest for “Face the Nation” or as I call it, “Deface the Nation.” It’s the highest for “Deface the Nation” since the World Trade Center. Since the World Trade Center came down. It’s a tremendous advantage.

I read the article and the transcript. Trump is not slamming 9/11, quite the opposite, he is showing that more people are interested in the crap reporting than they were with 9/11. And sadly, he is correct to say that it has bee a benefit to him. In fact, it helped get him elected, and they still can’t stop complaining instead of fixing what they did wrong to get him there.

Post
#1069702
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

CatBus said:

Someone out there was engaged in an anonymous, passive-aggressive protest that really amounted to strategic littering on a New York street. The residents subverted the protest and brought their community together around it. It’s still littering though, I guess, but at least it’s pretty now and community-approved: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/love-cross-nyc_us_58ff5447e4b0b6f6014ac24e?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

I had no idea there was a Gay Street in New York til I read this article. They did beautify it though.

Post
#1069521
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

chyron8472 said:

Jetrell Fo said:

https://nsarchive.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/trump-visitor-logs-foia-lawsuit-frinformsum-4132016/

This is funny. Clinton used Burn Bags for hers which is illegal and she’s still out running around singing? Common sense and priority are apparently out the window for these folks.

Dude, hush. Clinton is no longer relevant. She lost. She’s not running again. The End. Attacking her now makes no difference.

Meanwhile, Trump is still a pompous, blundering, bumbling idiot. You say if Hillary had won you’d give her a chance, but you can’t shut up about her when she doesn’t matter anymore. Shut up already about Hillary–she’s not even in any public office at all anymore.

I mean, you could similarly start attacking Michael Dukakis or Al Gore, or I could attack Bob Dole or Mitt Romney–for all the difference it would make.

I was just using her as an example in comparison to the article. It is fair game in that respect.

Post
#1069519
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

So, my apologies to those that came for help, and ended up with a little extra show this evening. It was not meant to derail the thread or somehow minimize your situations.

I want to say, I don’t think husezni was trying to be hateful, or demeaning. Some of our fellow members see it differently. That’s fine. We all have a unique view of the world because it belongs to us and no-one else. At times, especially on the internet, it comes off far worse than it really is. It’s just another example of how people are different compared to how people are alike. It is the curse, and the blessing, of being human.

😃

Post
#1069516
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

Possessed said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Possessed said:

It’s all our faults for antagonizing poor PTOTST. (Who directly stated he didn’t like frink. What a shocking coincidence!)

That is a whole different ball of wax my friend, LOL.

I did however at least give that user the benefit of the doubt before he went a hunting. I am guessing that is why someone laughed my way when PTOTST said he “liked me”. It was weird all the way around.

I’m sure we should be expecting another visit from him in the not so far off future.

He started going off the deep end before you said that, which probably influenced myself and possibly others to assume you were doing that. But I’m willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that you just hadn’t read some of his prior posts when you said that.

I had only seen the one thread and I believe it was the only one I posted in too at that point. I didn’t see the others or post til after he’d been banned. My apologies if I gave the wrong impression.

Post
#1069506
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

Possessed said:

It’s all our faults for antagonizing poor PTOTST. (Who directly stated he didn’t like frink. What a shocking coincidence!)

That is a whole different ball of wax my friend, LOL.

I did however at least give that user the benefit of the doubt before he went a hunting. I am guessing that is why someone laughed my way when PTOTST said he “liked me”. It was weird all the way around.

I’m sure we should be expecting another visit from him in the not so far off future.

Post
#1069487
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

DominicCobb said:

If you choose to ignore what I’m saying that’s fine. It’s clear the only one here with an “infighting” problem is you, as you’re clearing holding a grudge against me and take a biased view towards my posts.

Just know that from now on I won’t be putting up with your “posse” insults and will start reporting you when you refer to me as such.

Yeah, that’s what I’m doing, your threat is duly noted. The only thing that is clear, is that we see things differently. I will ask you politely to keep away from me at this point, and no, I won’t report you. I will respond in kind.

Now that we’re clear clear, can we please get back to helping people?

Post
#1069481
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

You read my post the way you wanted. I’m insulted because you do it, period, it doesn’t matter who it’s directed at. Instead of finding a better way to present it you tear and claw at folks. I don’t care who you like and who you don’t, the majority and the minority are obvious lines firmly drawn here and if you think I’m wrong, all one need do is look around at the history of disagreements.

I use the term “posse” because it never fails that after one of you takes issue with something said, others roll in one after another to pile on the dissatisfaction. Even telling people they are wrong and hated because no-one is defending them or thinks as they do but a group of you are right that they are wrong so you all must be right. It sucks.

Now, let’s be done with the infighting, and get back to helping people shall we?

Post
#1069474
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

DominicCobb said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DominicCobb said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Yeehaw … we got ourselves another roundup.

Lame.

😦

I’m sorry that I’d rather defend the struggling and good hearted coffee than the bigoted husezni that’s trying to make coffee hate himself. If that makes me a part of some “posse” then fine. I’m disappointed that you’d put petty disagreements with me in front of coffee’s personal mental health.

All my posts directly to those coming for support do not match your summation of my participation in the support of fellow members.

I know you voiced your support which is why I was so disappointed to see you defending husezni’s harmful words.

I will say that some of you seem to come in drooling when you go after folks over your interpretation of their words. That is something that should be left out of this thread and I’m sure you’d agree because we’re here to help people not hurt them.

I almost alway just ignore husezni’s bullshit, but if it’s going to hurt coffee, I’m not going to pass that by.

The fact that you lump all my critical posts into some kind of mythical “posse” is really irritating and honestly pretty insulting. My opinions are my own and I do not appreciate you considering me to be part of an unthinking and devious hive mind just because others agree with me and you don’t.

Your gallant enthusiasm to pounce claws first is insulting to me. Especially because it always happens when it’s someone you and others disagree with.

Post
#1069445
Topic
The Place to Go for Emotional Support
Time

DominicCobb said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Yeehaw … we got ourselves another roundup.

Lame.

😦

I’m sorry that I’d rather defend the struggling and good hearted coffee than the bigoted husezni that’s trying to make coffee hate himself. If that makes me a part of some “posse” then fine. I’m disappointed that you’d put petty disagreements with me in front of coffee’s personal mental health.

All my posts directly to those coming for support do not match your summation of my participation in the support of fellow members. I will say that some of you seem to come in drooling when you go after folks over your interpretation of their words. That is something that should be left out of this thread and I’m sure you’d agree because we’re here to help people not hurt them.

I have no more to say on the matter. Take it as you like. I will continue to support our members in need of it, because them and others in need, deserve it.

Good day to you.