logo Sign In

Jetrell Fo

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
12-Aug-2004
Last activity
18-May-2017
Posts
6,102

Post History

Post
#932714
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

Whichever mod eventually has to ban IKnowWhatYouDidLastSummer deserves a lifetime supply of whatever substance they enjoy most.

You must unlearn what you have learned. Ugly things last far longer than reason intended them to around here. It may be one sock trying to catch another … the sock probably belongs to someone long-standing round these parts … fact is, the rule about no socks is mute apparently … if they served no real purpose here … we wouldn’t have them or the rule against them. You’d also end up having to buy your groceries somewhere else.

Circle of life thing I guess.

Post
#927781
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

Dek Rollins said:

Why would any socks be allowed after the rules were changed, then?

Why wouldn’t they? Stranger things have happened here and there were some folks who weren’t happy with the rule change.

My original comment was actually meant towards the ones that were banned WHEN (prior to,reason for) the rules changed.

Post
#927779
Topic
TV's Frink's List of Bannable Offenses
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Your Eminence, may we please add … Impersonating JetrellFo … as a bannable offense? One of me is most certainly enough, correct?

LOL

I’m tired of you trying to incite me. This was a pot shot at ME you conceded ass nerf herder. Damn, not everything is about you around here. Can you get over your LOL phobia and your ego long enough to even understand your humor is NOT the only humor on this site.

Now I’m pissed. Your so f&*king spoiled here it makes me sick sometimes but I don’t say anything because I don’t need to get banned for making you cry or something. Now, I just don’t care.

Eat elephant crap and live would you.

Post
#927693
Topic
If you need to B*tch about something... this is the place
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

TV’s Frink said:

I’m quite sure this is one.

http://originaltrilogy.com/user/IKnowWhatYouDidLastSummer/id/26036

Yeah I was already skeptical about that one, but the statement of multiple socks roaming free intrigued me.

How can that be if sock accounts were banned?

Gee, I don’t know, maybe he’s already had multiple accounts banned but the moderators also have lives so they haven’t gotten to this one yet?

Or maybe it belongs to someone who was approved to have a sock account? It’s certainly another plausible explanation wouldn’t you agree?

Post
#927684
Topic
Should The Off Topic Section be more moderated?
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Unless your intention is to create an issue between you and I that does not exist I am asking you politely to back off. You and Dek are not moderators either unless I missed something recently.

Um, no. You’ve been taking potshots at me recently for no particular reason I can discern, so if you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.

And this part of the forum is generally unmoderated, so you don’t get to tell me what to post and what not to post.

Now you’re Mr. Sensitive?

Relax, I was merely having a little fun, as you often do with others. So it’s not okay for me? I also didn’t tell you anything. I politely asked you to back off. There IS a difference.

I have no beef with you and I don’t want one. It would seem that maybe you’re just itching for there to be one so you can pounce with false justification.

You are the only person on this forum that I know of that can hold a grudge longer than any Mongolian Mountain woman can carry a Yak on her back.

I’m sorry your upset … if you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.

Post
#927625
Topic
Should The Off Topic Section be more moderated?
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I think another example of something that speaks poorly about things here … is that the TeamNegative1 thread is still in the announcements. Since the matter was decided upon there is no good reason I can see for it to remain … it seems almost childish … like the site is still sticking it’s proverbial tongue at people because somehow it “destroyed the most hated team of people” on the Internet.

Last time I checked there are still people who are clueless, if not misinformed about what happened. (We also have someone who’s made a very disturbing post on social media recently who thinks we have done TN1 a terrible wrong. About as close to making a personal threat as you can get away with.) Does this site not have the right to keep the facts in public view?

If you think that announcement should come down, please talk to Jay about it.

Jay has already publicly told me how he felt about how I felt so I take that as his final word on the matter.

I don’t think you understand what “final” means.

I do not need a dictionary education from you, thank you very much. Unless your intention is to create an issue between you and I that does not exist I am asking you politely to back off. You and Dek are not moderators either unless I missed something recently.

I said what I meant and I meant what I said. I respect Jay’s decision as it’s his board but there is nothing in the rule book that says I have to like it as well. It is only MY opinion that it is an eye sore because it does not contain all the relevant information. I’m not asking you to agree with me or my opinion. That would be stupid. If the thread stays, it stays. I don’t lose sleep over it.

Post
#927582
Topic
Should The Off Topic Section be more moderated?
Time

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

I think another example of something that speaks poorly about things here … is that the TeamNegative1 thread is still in the announcements. Since the matter was decided upon there is no good reason I can see for it to remain … it seems almost childish … like the site is still sticking it’s proverbial tongue at people because somehow it “destroyed the most hated team of people” on the Internet.

Last time I checked there are still people who are clueless, if not misinformed about what happened. (We also have someone who’s made a very disturbing post on social media recently who thinks we have done TN1 a terrible wrong. About as close to making a personal threat as you can get away with.) Does this site not have the right to keep the facts in public view?

If you think that announcement should come down, please talk to Jay about it.

Jay has already publicly told me how he felt about how I felt so I take that as his final word on the matter. That thread does not display all the relevant information regarding the situation so it is itself a bit misleading. I did not know about the threat. That said, I do believe the site should take a positive stand towards it, not a negative one, we aren’t just a bunch of cavemen living in their parents basements are we? Okay maybe I am, LOL, but that’s an entirely different discussion.

Post
#927501
Topic
Should The Off Topic Section be more moderated?
Time

imperialscum said:

Let’s be honest, “light moderation” is a fancy term for “let’s ban few specific individuals simply because we don’t like them”. Like corrupt politicians when they make some fancy sounding laws with a sole purpose to enable them exploit something they desire.

It is funny that some of you, unlike me, have been actually braking the forum rules (sock accounts, direct insults etc.). And the most most hilarious thing is that, of all people, a well-known troll was nominated as a potential moderator. 😄

Aside from whatever issue there was over collectibles, there is some truth in this. We do have some members, since I’ve been a member here, that can clutter up some of the project threads with off-topic remarks and the like, and they seem to get a wider birth than say someone people may have ganged up on.

I think another example of something that speaks poorly about things here … is that the TeamNegative1 thread is still in the announcements. Since the matter was decided upon there is no good reason I can see for it to remain … it seems almost childish … like the site is still sticking it’s proverbial tongue at people because somehow it “destroyed the most hated team of people” on the Internet.

If the rules are gonna be lax for some, they should be lax for all. I am for the moderation of off-topic until we can at least learn to better moderate ourselves equally within the boundaries already laid out by the rules that are in place now.

Post
#927495
Topic
The "101 Ways to Improve Off-Topic" Thread
Time

doubleKO said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

I’m a realist.

You’re also the best dead horse beater we have here too.

You follow a live horse around trying to beat it with a fly swat.

He beats it with the dullest thing he can find until even the death of it’s death is dead, and then continues beating it some more. He’s consistent, that’s for sure.

😃