logo Sign In

Jeebus

User Group
Members
Join date
24-Mar-2016
Last activity
7-Sep-2021
Posts
2,199

Post History

Post
#1107406
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

snooker said:

Here’s doubleofive’s old list of wanted ROTJ changes if anyone wants to take a look.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140927233237/http://doubleofive.wordpress.com:80/rotj-fanedit-wishlist/

I quite like the idea of having the barge assault be a little (or quite a bit) more violent. I think it would do better at selling the idea that Luke is getting very close to the Dark Side. I imagine the change would be very controversial, though.

Post
#1107023
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

yhwx said:

This PewDiePie guy doesn’t look good.

https://kotaku.com/indie-dev-calls-for-copyright-strikes-against-pewdiepie-1803099736

Game developer Sean Vanaman announced on social media today that Campo Santo, the studio behind the indie game Firewatch, will be filing a takedown against Felix “Pewdiepie” Kjellberg on YouTube over footage featuring their latest game, as well any future releases. This came hours after widely circulated footage showed Kjellberg say the n-word while streaming an online shooter.

“There is a bit of leeway you have to have with the internet when u wake up every day and make video games,” Vanaman wrote on Twitter. “There’s also a breaking point.”

Vanaman appeared to be reacting to the latest controversy surrounding the YouTube star, as this afternoon, a clip in which Kjellberg called a Battlegrounds player the n-word spread widely on message boards and social media. “What a f**ing n-” Kjellberg said, while killing an opponent. “Sorry, but what the f**. What a f***ing asshole.”

Campo Santo declined to comment when asked by Kotaku if Vanaman was responding directly to the video clip, but Vanaman’s tweets are pretty clear. “He’s worse than a closeted racist: he’s a propagator of despicable garbage that does real damage to the culture around this industry,” Vanaman wrote.

Previously, Kjellberg uploaded a full playthrough of Firewatch that has been viewed 5.7 million times on YouTube, and in the description for that 2016 video, he calls it “a wonderful story driven game.” If Campo Santo goes forward with its plan, the Digital Rights Millennium Act would be invoked to protect their copyright over Firewatch, meaning the video could be taken down. UPDATE 7:28 PM: the video is currently unavailable.

Kjellberg did not respond to a request for comment, but has been in the spotlight over the last year for a number of contentious reasons, including jokes about Jewish people, ironically embracing nazi references, and tussles with mainstream media. This latest flare-up is actually not the first time Kjellberg has said the n-word on his channel. Actually, on YouTube, hearing a personality with a large following say the n-word isn’t particularly out of the ordinary. The Battlegrounds community is also permissive here: players sometimes scream the n-word before matches start, and in some cases, offensive antics are considered a spectacle by viewers.

“I am sick of this child getting more and more chances to make money off of what we make,” Vanaman wrote on Twitter.

Vanaman also urged other developers to do the same, stating that he would “be reaching out to folks much larger than us to cut him off from the content that has made him a millionaire.”

Uh, I don’t think they can do that.

Post
#1106474
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

chyron8472 said:

You make no effort to understand why Warbler feels the way he does,

yhwx said:

Why do you care so much about a kneel?

yhwx said:

What is so insulting to you about kneeling?

oojason said:

People raising awareness in a manner deemed undesirable to you takes prevalence over the cause itself?

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

…something you hold to be sacred…

But why?

Jeebus said:

Am I not a “true” American because I don’t revere the flag as a ‘holy’ object?

Post
#1106313
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Others, especially those around the world (that are allowed to do so) have no qualms protesting against symbols of their own Govt or country when it is failing it’s citizens, or there is an inequality perceived to be taking place with no-little appetite for change.

The raising of awareness for a cause is one of the first and most important steps in the long, slow and difficult road to implementing change. Media suppression or censorship certainly does not help that.

raising awareness in such a shitty way does not inspire me to help them.

People raising awareness in a manner deemed undesirable to you takes prevalence over the cause itself?

…something you hold to be sacred…

But why?

I don’t know how to explain to you why I hold to be sacred what I hold to be sacred.

Meaning you do know why you hold it sacred, but don’t think I’d understand; or you don’t know why you hold it sacred and can’t explain it for that reason?

meaning that I know why I hold it it sacred but I don’t know how to explain it. I especially don’t know how to explain it to someone that grew up in this country but yet still asks these kinds of questions.

Am I not a “true” American because I don’t revere the flag as a holy object?

That is not what I said.

Didn’t say you did, I just got a bit of a “I can’t believe he’s an American but doesn’t hold the flag in the same regard as I do, he must be crazy or something,” feeling from the quoted post; so I wanted to know your actual opinion on the matter.

and no, I don’t hold the flag as a holy object, just sacred. Holy for me is reserved for the cross and the Bible.

Is there a difference?

Post
#1106306
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Others, especially those around the world (that are allowed to do so) have no qualms protesting against symbols of their own Govt or country when it is failing it’s citizens, or there is an inequality perceived to be taking place with no-little appetite for change.

The raising of awareness for a cause is one of the first and most important steps in the long, slow and difficult road to implementing change. Media suppression or censorship certainly does not help that.

raising awareness in such a shitty way does not inspire me to help them.

People raising awareness in a manner deemed undesirable to you takes prevalence over the cause itself?

…something you hold to be sacred…

But why?

I don’t know how to explain to you why I hold to be sacred what I hold to be sacred.

Meaning you do know why you hold it sacred, but don’t think I’d understand; or you don’t know why you hold it sacred and can’t explain it for that reason?

meaning that I know why I hold it it sacred but I don’t know how to explain it. I especially don’t know how to explain it to someone that grew up in this country but yet still asks these kinds of questions.

Am I not a “true” American because I don’t revere the flag as a ‘holy’ object?

Post
#1106299
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Others, especially those around the world (that are allowed to do so) have no qualms protesting against symbols of their own Govt or country when it is failing it’s citizens, or there is an inequality perceived to be taking place with no-little appetite for change.

The raising of awareness for a cause is one of the first and most important steps in the long, slow and difficult road to implementing change. Media suppression or censorship certainly does not help that.

raising awareness in such a shitty way does not inspire me to help them.

People raising awareness in a manner deemed undesirable to you takes prevalence over the cause itself?

…something you hold to be sacred…

But why?

I don’t know how to explain to you why I hold to be sacred what I hold to be sacred.

Meaning you do know why you hold it sacred, but don’t think I’d understand; or you don’t know why you hold it sacred and can’t explain it for that reason?

Post
#1106275
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Warbler said:

oojason said:

Others, especially those around the world (that are allowed to do so) have no qualms protesting against symbols of their own Govt or country when it is failing it’s citizens, or there is an inequality perceived to be taking place with no-little appetite for change.

The raising of awareness for a cause is one of the first and most important steps in the long, slow and difficult road to implementing change. Media suppression or censorship certainly does not help that.

raising awareness in such a shitty way does not inspire me to help them.

People raising awareness in a manner deemed undesirable to you takes prevalence over the cause itself?

…something you hold to be sacred…

But why?

Post
#1106185
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/349423-sanders-brushes-off-clinton-criticism-look-forward-and-not-backward

“My response is that right now it’s appropriate to look forward and not backward,” Sanders told The Hill.

“I’m working overtime now to see we overturn Trump’s decision on DACA, pass a $15-an-hour minimum wage, and next week I’ll be offering a Medicare-for-all single-payer system,” he said.

Post
#1105423
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

DominicCobb said:

Jeebus said:

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/09/new-cancer-drug-priced-at-475k-raises-questions-about-pricing-and-value/

The $475,000 price tag is much less than Wall Street expected and might disappoint some investors who hoped for a premium on such a complex drug.

I have a lot to say about this, but it’s all very close to breaking rule 3; so all I’m gonna say is that these fucking sociopaths are a blight on this Earth.

Is this the gene therapy thing?

It is.

Not that I think that’s a good price tag, but it does sound like a pretty expensive operation.

I don’t doubt that it’s expensive; I’m just amazed that they have the gall to sell it at $150,000 above what it ‘should’ cost, and then turn around and say “hey, at least it isn’t $800,000.” The profit motive doesn’t work for healthcare.

Post
#1105410
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/09/new-cancer-drug-priced-at-475k-raises-questions-about-pricing-and-value/

The $475,000 price tag is much less than Wall Street expected and might disappoint some investors who hoped for a premium on such a complex drug.

I have a lot to say about this, but it’s all very close to breaking rule 3; so all I’m gonna say is that these fucking sociopaths are a blight on this Earth.

Post
#1105408
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Personally, I do believe Sanders would’ve gotten more votes than Hillary, I can’t say how many more, though. There are definitely a lot of reasons why Trump won, but I’d be willing to bet that a sizable portion of them are under the umbrella of Hillary. I don’t doubt that the ‘socialism’ thing would’ve been a major hurdle; and it’s a bit of a shame, since I think both sides are really misunderstanding the term (Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist, and to some people, Socialism instantly springs Communist regimes to mind). On the other hand, I think he would’ve run a very good issue-focused campaign.

Honestly, I think Hillary’s irrelevant at this point, and she should stay that way. To some, it seems like she’s preparing to run again in 2020, but I think the best thing she could do for the country is just not. It’s clear that she hasn’t matured or learned anything since November, so she’d really just be handing the election to Trump, and I don’t want that to happen.

Post
#1104977
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

Possessed said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Why can’t people just accept that their memory isn’t perfect?

I’m not really saying I actually believe in an alternate universe but there is a significant number of people who claim they remember it as Stein. There’s even groups dedicated to trying to prove it lol

My totally unqualified explanation is that ‘stein’ is a more common suffix than ‘stain’, so a lot of people (me included) just assumed it was ‘stein’ without looking closely.