logo Sign In

GundarkHunter

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Mar-2003
Last activity
9-Apr-2017
Posts
4,720

Post History

Post
#179133
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
What it boils down to is a lack of respect. Tolerance is the lowest level of respect. What the European papers have done by publishing the comics is show a total lack of respect for the Muslim community and couched it in the terms of "freedom of the press." However, the Muslim community has done nothing to mitigate the damage by violently protesting the publication of the comics. In fact, what they've done is arouse curiosity and made the issue mushroom into something even more offensive: the "car-crash effect", as I like to call it. If the Muslim community had either issued a strongly worded rebuke or done nothing, the whole issue would have gone away; instead, it winds up making headlines all over the world, and now EVERYONE has to see the comics to see what all the fuss is about.

There are only two ways to deal with the disrespectful: one is to rebuke them, and the other is to ignore them. Anything else is going to fuel their flames.
Post
#179004
Topic
T2 HDWMV isn't the full print
Time
Originally posted by: Knightmessenger
So E. T. wasn't open matte. Thanks for the correction and how did you find that out? Is there any way to find out if a particular film was shot open matte. Were most of the mgm films named in the lawsuit actually matted widescreen or were the people not even that bright? Does IMDB point it out when it lists the aspect ratio for a film?

When E.T. was first released on video back in the late 80s, Video Review ran an article on the process of transferring the film to video. The subject of letterboxing was brought up, and since cinematographer Allen Daviau worked closely with the colorist on the transfer, he divulged in the article that he had composed the film in a loose 1.75:1 aspect ratio and shot with a 1.66:1 hard matte in the camera. It's just one of those things that has stuck in my head.