logo Sign In

Fang Zei

User Group
Members
Join date
14-Oct-2006
Last activity
3-Jul-2025
Posts
2,779

Post History

Post
#1072559
Topic
Star Wars Negatives and Interpositives
Time

Cthulhunicron said:

I’m aware of the clean up that happened in the 90s, because the film was in bad shape. So as far as I understand things, the original negatives were scanned digitally, cleaned up, and then used as the basis for the special editions as well as the 1993 release.

The 1993 release was simply the final time a fresh video master was made from the 1985 interpositives (it was done for the definitive collection laserdisc release in '93 and reused for the “Faces” aka “One Last Time” aka “THX” release in '95). Since it was still the early 90’s, this last video master was only done as a 4:3 standard def transfer with the 2.35:1 image letterboxed. Hence, in 2006 when George was reminded by the people at Lucasfilm that an unaltered dvd release would make quite a bit of money but he didn’t feel like spending a dime on it, this was the most recent transfer and we got the GOUT.

The restoration for the Special Edition wasn’t even started until 1994 and involved physically cleaning and restoring the original negatives themselves. No digital scanning was done except for the SE additions where cgi was integrated into existing shots. The technology to digitally clean up an entire film at resolutions high enough to be printed back to film for theatrical exhibition wouldn’t exist for another several years AFAIK.

The SE restoration is a fascinating subject in and of itself since they cleaned the entirety of the movies, including the parts that were going to be replaced anyway for the SE. Some frames on the o-neg were damaged beyond repair and were replaced with dupe neg made from the '85 interpositives since that was the next best source. So not only are the altered parts of the negative still in storage somewhere, the '85 interpositive is also a viable source for an OOT restoration should it come to that.

But yeah, what Density said x1,000,000. See: just about any criterion release for good examples of stunning restorations that didn’t use an original negative.

Post
#1072290
Topic
How did you first see the Star Wars films?
Time

I don’t really have a clear memory of seeing Star Wars for the first time the way a lot of you do.

I got into Trek first. My mom rented Search for Spock when I was 5 (1990/91) and from then on I was hooked (I detailed this recently in the Star Trek thread in off topic).

Star Wars was just something I always kinda knew about, and it was finding out relatively early on that ILM had also worked on several of the Trek films that I think helped me avoid the “Trek vs Wars” thing, though I was definitely the outlier in my class of 30 for liking Trek. All the cool kids were “down with the trilogy” (they didn’t actually say that, I’m just quoting Clerks II).

There was another connection to a separate “franchise” I remember finding out about. Really random memory time here, but back in the early days of Sci-Fi Channel there was this mini-vignette they would always play during commercial breaks. Voiceover guy was talking about so-and-so who won such-and-such awards for his work on Star Wars and Battlestar Galactica, and I remember very clearly they played the shot of Artoo and Threepio crossing the Tantive corridor as blaster bolts somehow miss them. It was only in recent years that I realized they must have been interviewing John Dykstra. In any event, I don’t really have an earliest Star Wars memory.

One thing I do remember quite clearly is being in first or second grade (91/92) and looking through one of those children’s story books lying on the shelf in the classroom. It had photos from the movies (possibly it was only from RotJ). At one point, I was on a page with that photo of Jabba with Leia in the metal bikini. A friend of mine goes “you know who that guy is?” as he points to the green-armored person with the helmet standing by Jabba’s side. “That’s Boba Fett,” he tells me.

I must have seen the original movie or at least gotten the gist of it, because I remember staying over at my relatives’ place and popping in their vhs of RotJ they’d recorded off a tv broadcast. They had a whole drawer full of movies they’d taped off tv years earlier before they had ditched cable. Smart thinking, really. Since it had the word “Return” in the title, I incorrectly assumed it was the second movie of the trilogy and not the third. By the scene where Han still frozen in carbonite was revealed, I realized I had no idea what was going on. Must’ve ejected the tape not long after that.

I must have just sorta known Vader was Luke’s father, because I definitely saw RotJ first. It must’ve been when USA network was airing them in the early-to-mid nineties, or possibly when Sci-Fi Channel showed the movies letterboxed. Actually, I remember vividly my first time seeing the “I am your father” scene from ESB and I’m pretty sure it was as a clip in some retrospective vignette they were playing on Sci-Fi channel right around that same time (early to mid 90’s).

So yeah, my first clear memory of watching the OT would probably be as the USA network P&S broadcasts. I still remember it cut to commercial right after the Emperor’s “So be it … Jedi” and my dad echoed the words.

VHS rentals helped fill in the gaps, of course. I’m pretty sure that’s how I actually sat down and watched the first two films properly for the first time. My mom also ended up getting me the Faces VHS of ANH for Christmas of '95.

I saw the SE’s once each in the theater (was eleven, same age as JJ in '77) and got the widescreen vhs SE trilogy “silverbox” for Christmas that year. For seven years, that was my Star Wars. I actually have to credit my mom with getting me fascinated with aspect ratios, whether she meant to or not. Funny how almost every time I saw the SE vhs set sitting on someone’s shelf it was almost always the fullscreen “goldbox” when seven years later it was jarring to see an '04 dvd set that was gold instead of silver.

We got the ‘04 dvd set of course, a month or so after it was released. It was sheer curiosity about the fanmade bootlegs that led me to this place. During the couple hours’ wait before the midnight opening of RotS, I noticed someone in one of the rows closer to the screen watching ESB on their laptop … and it was the original version. Started lurking here later that summer, finally got around to downloading Cowclops v2 in March of '06. That was an experience, and what I would probably call my first time seeing these movies in something halfway resembling how they were originally shown in theaters.

Post
#1072263
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Y’know, if a restored/remastered OOT were to happen within the next couple years, do you think Lucasfilm would just release the original three movies or do you think it would be all six (with the OT movies “just happening to include their original versions”)?

Reason I ask is because the OT hasn’t recieved preferential treatment on home media since forever ago. Yeah, there was the GOUT, but that was also the first time the original three were available individually so it hardly counts.

It’s actually kind of hard for me to imagine LFL re-releasing only the OT movies just for the sake of putting the OOT on the market. Even if the SE was from the newer 4k master, I feel like it would just seem awkward. Sure, we would be thrilled, but I could see prequel/SE fans not liking the preferential treatment the OT was getting. LFL doesn’t want division within the fandom like that. I could see them also reissuing the prequels at the same time. While the changes to TPM have not been nearly as extensive as those to the OT, it’s essentially its own SE now. The theatrical version would be a nice bonus, ditto the Imax cut of AotC.

This is why I don’t think they’ll bother to put out the OOT until the time comes for a 4k UHD release, which won’t be for another several years anyway. I could see them putting it together similarly to how they did the 2011 “complete saga” set. Maybe they could even carry over the dvd extras that weren’t included in the blu-ray (“The Beginning,” anyone?). There’s even a few good ones they’ve never included in any release, like the Fox specials hosted by Howie Long and Samuel L. Jackson that aired in '97 and '99, respectively. There was also The Legacy Revealed from EoD’s Kevin Burns, which aired on the history channel in 2007.

If it really is going to take that long, one upside is it will give us more time to petition Lucasfilm with everything we’d want to see included, like the '97 SE for example.

Post
#1071805
Topic
The Marvel Cinematic Universe
Time

Maybe they’re saving the fifth one for when it opens here in the States. I’ve heard they’ve done that in the past. The first GotG in particular kept a tight lid on the post-credits scene at the very end of the movie, even the critics didn’t see it at their screenings.

Then there’s the Schawarma scene at the end of Avengers, which wasn’t even shot until after the world premiere IIRC.

Post
#1071435
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Someone brought up the question of just how much of a percentage Fox gets on ESB, RotJ and the PT.

Maybe it’s not worth it for Disney to wait three years if they only have to share a small percentage of the profits from those movies.

Also, if they can’t keep selling the same SKU’s after May of 2020, an OOT restoration released within the next couple years practically screams to have the words “limited edition” emblazoned across its cover.

Post
#1071167
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

SilverWook said:

MalàStrana said:

lovelikewinter said:

James Cameron is a douche

Ouch 😄 ! One of the most important artists of the past decades. Not only an artist, but an engineer and an explorer. The kind of man (along with Lucas by the way, as well as Zemeckis, Spielberg, Jackson and Del Toro) who is a pioneer and a researcher in cinematic ways of telling a story. One of the most talented sci-fi storytellers. So… ok man, “bouh hou hou, Cameron said bad things about Episode 7, he’s a douche, bouh hou hou me sad 😦”… Ok 😄

I don’t think anyone is disputing that. But if he could find time in his busy schedule to sign off on HD transfers of The Abyss and True Lies, so they could finally see a Blu Ray release this century, that would be nice. 😉
Seriously, there was never even an anamorphic DVD of either film.

At least by waiting this long they can take advantage of even newer home video formats … assuming they ever get around to it at all.

Post
#1071114
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Sougouk said:

darthrush said:

lovelikewinter said:

James Cameron is a douche who only gets away with it because most of his movies turn out decent. Good luck on people caring about the 5 million Avatar sequels.

I loved Avatar…sue me.

I liked Avatar, it was a fun movie. But, making 4 sequels… sheesh!

In all fairness, Hollywood set a terrible precedent when a Transformers Cinematic Universe was announced.

Post
#1070907
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Disco_Lobot said:

lovelikewinter said:

I was reading up on the Legacy 4K Scan and I’m wondering why Lucasfilm is so afraid of it. They let Despecialized and Silver Screen have free reign. Hundreds of copies sold on ebay. But Verta was told point blank if it gets out, they will go after him.

My understanding is that it has to do with how he got the source material… very different situation supposedly

Right, but … (see: question in my post above)

Post
#1070859
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

MrPib said:

yoda-sama said:
Also, I don’t know if it is necessarily disheartening that the head of Lucasfilm has announced they aren’t further ruining the OT through continued SE dicking around.

Her saying “Those will always remain his” is disheartening to me, because I take it mean that they’ll respect GL’s “vision” for SW – which would mean no theatricals, ever.

George himself released the original versions on dvd, albeit in terrible quality, which is what we’ve been waiting all this time for the new regime to rectify.

Talking about hypothetical future changes to George’s version and saying whether or not you’re going to release earlier versions that already exist seem like two totally unrelated things to me.

Post
#1070594
Topic
Kathleen Kennedy Shuts Down any Hope for Unaltered Release <em>(*not really)</em>
Time

Anyway, I’m sure Kennedy is well aware of the demand for an unaltered release on modern formats (blu-ray, 4k, digital, etc). The podcast guy should’ve made it clear he was asking about that, although as someone suggested, maybe he actually wasn’t asking about that at all. Maybe he actually meant to ask her what he asked her, which would be weird because who really cares what Disney does with George’s version but whatever, to each their own.

Post
#1070497
Topic
4K restoration on Star Wars
Time

Amano said:

I still cannot believe that Kennedy buries the original cut of Star Wars while celebrating the 40th anniversary of said cut.

That would be a sad anniversary (with the passing of the jubilarian), indeed.

(My first post btw, I am a very long time lurker in these forums and just found the motivation to register. Living in Austria, Europe. A big hello to everybody.)

Welcome!