logo Sign In

Fang Zei

User Group
Members
Join date
14-Oct-2006
Last activity
4-Nov-2025
Posts
2,797

Post History

Post
#1616821
Topic
'Rey Skywalker' (Upcoming live action motion picture) - general discussion thread
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

Pulled from 2026 Christmas release is un-freakin believable.

It really isn’t, though.

Dune: Messiah is also set for that same date.

The irony of all of this to me is that we went from five movies that got rushed through production to five years of streaming shows without a single new theatrical film. Now the first one we actually get won’t be any of the originally announced projects but a continuation of one of the shows.

Maybe this is actually a good thing, since this way there’s less of a chance they rush unfinished scripts before the camera.

Post
#1614221
Topic
DIGITAL MASTER FROM 1995-1997 (TEDIOUS AND SOMEWHAT LONG TOPIC)
Time

The only things that got scanned into the digital realm in ‘95/‘96 were the shots getting cgi added to them. The optical composites were also redone digitally using scans of, presumably, the original VistaVision vfx footage.

Literally everything else had to be restored photochemically.

Lowry’s 2004 HD master that was initially prepared for the dvd was created from a 2k scan of the camera negative. This was redone from scratch in 2012 for the 4k.

The new pieces of negative created in ‘96 for the SE would’ve mostly been filmouts of footage that had gone through the computer to have new cg effects added to them (obvious exceptions here and there, the new shots of Boba Fett and Oola in RotJ for example) and/or been generated entirely in cg. It’s unclear whether these new and redone vfx shots still existed in purely digital form by 2004/2012 or if only the filmed out negative was made.

TPM’s digital filmout tapes, which were used to film out the final “negative” in May of ‘99, were still readable twelve years later when it came time to prepare the blu-ray and do the 3D conversion. Remember, unlike the SE which was still mostly the true original camera negative, every single shot in TPM had to go through the computer to have vfx added to it, something pretty much unprecedented for a live action film at the time. Even the few shots that had no vfx added to them were scanned in/out just for the sake of consistency.

So, for the SE it was just the new cgi vfx shots (either the old footage with cgi added to it or the entirely new cg shots) and the digitally recomp’d shots that would have existed in their finished form as digital filmout tapes before being, well, filmed out to brand new pieces of negative. Whether those filmout tapes were saved and still readable by 2004/2012 is unclear, but I’ll just say that back in ‘04 watching the dvd even the entirely cg shots in A New Hope still look like they were scanned back in off the filmed-out negative.

Post
#1613843
Topic
<strong>Dawn of the Jedi</strong> (live action film by James Mangold) - a general discussion thread
Time

Acbagel said:

Wish they’d just adapt the Dawn of the Jedi novel/comics from the EU. I really want to see Disney Star Wars attempt a genuine and faithful EU adaptation to live action, and the Old Republic/Dawn era is a perfect place to experiment with this.

I just feel like they’re never going to do that in order to maintain the element of surprise. Otherwise the fans would already know what was going go happen.

That’s the whole reason they gave for rebooting the EU in the first place, to “maintain the element of surprise for the audience.” Of course, they could have still set the sequel trilogy within the existing EU if they’d really wanted to, but even Lucas doesn’t seem to have been planning on that before he decided to step away for good.

Anyway, the latest rumor is that Mangold plans on tackling this movie next, possibly as early as next year, after his Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown” comes out in December.

Post
#1582706
Topic
Info: Theatrical AOTC Discussion Thread
Time

MonkeyLizard10 said:

Fang Zei said:

MonkeyLizard10 said:

Does anyone happen to know off-hand which DTS trailer(s) would have been the ones played before DTS showings of AOTC?

EDIT: actually the DTS disc for it should give it away so long as the names are not too short and cryptic

Like Mike and that first teaser for the Matrix sequels are two that I still remember from my opening day screening.

Total guess as to what else would be on the dts disc.

Minority Report, The Bourne Identity, and Men in Black II are other possibilities.

According to the DTS disc, for DTS theaters, either the regular DTS trailer or the DTS SONIC trailer were used.

For THX it seems that many seem to think that the first theatrical (as opposed to home video) premiere of the relatively new 2001 THX Cavalcade trailer was with Attack Of The Clones.

Yeah Like Mike trailer ‘A’ is for sure that was supposed to always run as well as the built into the first reel Minrority Report trailer ‘C’. They are the two with audio on the AOTC Cinema DTS feature disc.

I was a little unsure about The Matrix Revolutions since it didn’t come out for over a year later and if it was true figured it must have been the teaser so it is cool that you confirm that you saw The Matrix Revolutions teaser.

Apparently some say the film was supposed to only run with 4 trailer max limit opening week, although it is unclear if that meant max 4 in addition to the built-in Minority Report or max in addition to that plus Like Mike so whether it was supposed to be 4 or 5 or 6 total. Most seem to think probably the limit meant max 6 total but maybe 5 total and few think it meant 4 total.

Apparently Star Trek Nemesis, Men In Black II, Die Another Day, Austin Powers Goldmember were other options.

Probably it was Minority Report ‘C’ + Like Mike ‘A’ and then some mix of 4 of: Star Trek Nemesis, Men In Black II, Die Another Day, Austin Powers Goldmember, The Matrix Reloaded teaser. There also seems to have been a Star Trek Nemesis w/Men In Black II combo trailer not sure if that was supposed to count as one or two, maybe ones that showed that then also shows The Matrix Reloaded teaser or something?

To clarify, the very first teaser for the Matrix sequels went out to theaters with AotC. I still have a vague memory almost twenty-two years later of watching it in quicktime as soon as it went up online the night before. It was for both sequels, but only contained footage from Reloaded since they were probably still in the middle of filming Revolutions and didn’t want to give away too much about where the story was going anyway.

Post
#1580203
Topic
Info: Theatrical AOTC Discussion Thread
Time

MonkeyLizard10 said:

Does anyone happen to know off-hand which DTS trailer(s) would have been the ones played before DTS showings of AOTC?

EDIT: actually the DTS disc for it should give it away so long as the names are not too short and cryptic

Like Mike and that first teaser for the Matrix sequels are two that I still remember from my opening day screening.

Total guess as to what else would be on the dts disc.

Minority Report, The Bourne Identity, and Men in Black II are other possibilities.

Post
#1562653
Topic
Disney Plus should release all of the theatrical versions of the Star Wars movies on their service
Time

Another Enthusiast said:

JadedSkywalker said:

People holding out for the originals are gonna be disappointed they haven’t been touched since the laserdisc master in 1992. The restoration was the 1997 edit. No restored OT exists.

The best you can hope for is team blu. I can’t fathom the mind of George Lucas on this nor will i try to psychoanalyze it, its just so bizarre.

To be fair, the Light & Magic trailer on YouTube does show the Death Star explosion with no Praxis effect, which I’m pretty sure is what the comment above yours was referring to. I believe it is also in the actual series, also, and not just in the trailer, but I have not yet watched the series. In addition, I believe it is a possibility that when the '19SE master was created, the new master created was digitally backed up without any alterations. I may be wrong, though. I believe I remember reading somewhere that the unaltered footage in Light & Magic was not sourced from Despecialized or 4K77. This may bring more credibility to my guess, or not, depending on personal opinion. Make of that what you will.

It’s in the actual series itself also. I’m pretty sure all of the footage they used is the actual unaltered material.

There was a rumor back around 2015 that Lucasfilm was going through every last piece of film footage they had and cataloguing it. I’m sure they have, at the very least, a raw scan of some type of print of the OOT, even if they haven’t spent the money to restore it.

Post
#1555644
Topic
what's the original format of star wars trilogy? 35mm or 70mm?
Time

Pryze said:

A bit of an old thread – but does anyone on here know the actual “resolution” of the 70mm print? Like if you COULD compare it to a digital res like 4k or 8k, what would it be?

This is actually something I’ve always wondered myself.

It’s probably around 4k worth of perceivable detail, although I’m not sure exactly at what point in the photochemical chain the OT films were blown up to 70 from 35.

There was actually a study done years ago where it was estimated a 35mm release print was only projecting about 875 lines worth of detail onto the screen at the absolute most.

70mm is a perf taller than 35 and roughly twice as wide, but that still only gets you between 2k and 3k worth of information up there on screen.

There’s way more detail to be gleaned from the camera negative itself, but seeing a Star Wars movie in 70mm back in the day was getting you as close as possible to what the 35mm cameras captured.

Post
#1551624
Topic
Will Disney eventually release every version of all Star Wars movies?
Time

thepowerofwill said:

JadedSkywalker said:

They also are releasing Prey on 4k. From 20th Century Studios. I never thought Disney would put out so much all at once.

is it on their disney+ ? or where ?

That ended up being made exclusively for Hulu. By skipping theaters altogether they exploited a loophole that would’ve otherwise required that the movie have a window on HBO afterwards. Avatar 2 was apparently the very last new movie in their deal with HBO.

Post
#1549731
Topic
The end of Star Wars physical media
Time

Roobyoo said:

jpb19 said:

Roobyoo said:

This is a punch into the gut. I recently tried to watch The Phantom Menace (don’t blame me) on Disney+, but the low bitrate and bad sound quality had to force me to turn it off. So I decided to plug in my HDD with an own rip of the film from my Blu-ray, with a prestine bitrate and DTS sound. The podrace scene was like night and day compared to the stream.

Bad bitrate and sound quality? Disney Plus version is 4K. Streams are based on your Internet connection. I prefer digital 4K versions of Star Wars over Star Wars on disc for the altered versions of the six films. I own Star Wars on digital HD. Eventually, I will purchase 4K versions of all 11 Star Wars movies. If you have ITunes, you can download 4K versions locally to your PC and cast the video to a smart TV screen or Roku device.

Resolution isn’t the same as bitrate. The lower the bitrate, the more compression artifacts you’ll get. With a 4k Blu-ray you’ll probably will get around 1000 mbps, although Disney+ in 4k dumps around 17 Mbps.

My internet connection is very good, and I’m streaming via direct cable connection.

I’m guessing that’s a typo, but just to be clear, a 4k disc will peak at 100mbps, not 1000.

Post
#1549729
Topic
Who Would Like To See An Original Star Wars Re-Release Theatrical Showing?
Time

CarboniteSolo said:

I think Disney is going to release the original trilogy again in theaters in 2027 for the 50th anniversary.

Wouldn’t surprise me at all.

Maybe they’d even do it the year before the big anniversary, sort of like how George was originally planning the SE for ‘96 before realizing Episode I wasn’t going to be ready in ‘97.

Right now the rumor is ‘26/‘27 for the Rey movie. I could almost see them attaching a saga 3D trailer to Avatar 3 at the end of ‘25 in the style of that first SE trailer, starting off just 2D with the glasses on … but then …

“If you’ve only seen it this way, you haven’t seen it at all.”

Post
#1549728
Topic
The Empire Strikes Back 4k DCP
Time

As others have said, yeah, the 2020 Empire dcp was still from the 2011 for some reason. Even though the 4k master had already been out there in UHD form on disc for several months (and for several months more on Disney+).

RotJ’s re-release this year was apparently the 4k. This still wasn’t shown in Dolby Cinema or Imax, though. I can’t help but feel like they’re holding those back for a big theatrical re-release of all the films at some point further down the road, maybe when they get around to converting the OT into 3D.

Post
#1541918
Topic
25 Years of the Special Edition
Time

WookieeWarrior77 said:

Fang Zei said:

I also remember wondering if the special edition would be considered the official version going forward but seeing that first TPM teaser on Entertainment Tonight in November of ‘98 pretty definitively answered that question for me.

Do you think LFL/Disney would ever commission ILM to do a complete re-do of the SE? Re-rendering the ‘97 cg shots at late 2000’s / early 2010’s quality would not only be cost-effective but also wouldn’t exceed the resolution of the ST and the cg wouldn’t go from ‘99 to ‘05 quality only to revert to ‘97 quality for modern viewers watching the saga in official order for the first time.

Before you say “but what about ‘04 Jabba?”, well, I still think the ‘97 version looked better.

I highly doubt that would ever happen. Kathleen Kennedy’s often misunderstood quote of, “I wouldn’t touch those, they´re his” (or something to that effect) means LFL under Disney wouldn’t make any new changes to the movies. It does NOT mean they would never release the originals. That isn’t changing the movies, that’s giving another cut which has existed for over 40 years.

I forgot to add “with George’s blessing.”

If he’s still okay with how everything looks 26 years later then that’s probably how the cgi shots will look forever. I doubt he wants to bother with it anymore.

Post
#1541841
Topic
25 Years of the Special Edition
Time

I also remember wondering if the special edition would be considered the official version going forward but seeing that first TPM teaser on Entertainment Tonight in November of ‘98 pretty definitively answered that question for me.

Do you think LFL/Disney would ever commission ILM to do a complete re-do of the SE? Re-rendering the ‘97 cg shots at late 2000’s / early 2010’s quality would not only be cost-effective but also wouldn’t exceed the resolution of the ST and the cg wouldn’t go from ‘99 to ‘05 quality only to revert to ‘97 quality for modern viewers watching the saga in official order for the first time.

Before you say “but what about ‘04 Jabba?”, well, I still think the ‘97 version looked better.

Post
#1538348
Topic
It seems like nobody involved in the making of the Original Trilogy has spoken up about George Lucas’ oppression of the unaltered theatrical version of the OT.
Time

Cameron has said he considers the special edition of Star Wars a revision of history and I couldn’t help but think of his considering the version of Avatar that won Academy Awards the definitive version as a subtle nod to that.

Of course, he himself has altered his films using digital technology but it was almost always to fix visible mistakes or continuity errors.

Post
#1536347
Topic
Return Of The Jedi's 40th anniversary
Time

ThatPixarGuy said:

Fang Zei said:

ThatPixarGuy said:

SomethingStarWarsRelated said:

ThatPixarGuy said:

I’m seeing a 40th anniversary screening with some family and friends on Saturday. The theatrical cut would be preferable of course, but I’m just happy to see a good Star Wars film in theaters haha.

Was it ever clarified why Empire’s 40th anniversary screenings used the 2011 Blu-ray rather than the more recent 2019 transfer? Hopefully that won’t be the same case here…

Yes, I was just wondering this. Once you see it, could you let us know which version it is?

Sure!

The only thing that would really give it away is the color timing, as the 2011 and 2019 versions are basically otherwise identical.

LexX said:

Fang Zei said:

ThatPixarGuy said:

SomethingStarWarsRelated said:

ThatPixarGuy said:

I’m seeing a 40th anniversary screening with some family and friends on Saturday. The theatrical cut would be preferable of course, but I’m just happy to see a good Star Wars film in theaters haha.

Was it ever clarified why Empire’s 40th anniversary screenings used the 2011 Blu-ray rather than the more recent 2019 transfer? Hopefully that won’t be the same case here…

Yes, I was just wondering this. Once you see it, could you let us know which version it is?

Sure!

The only thing that would really give it away is the color timing, as the 2011 and 2019 versions are basically otherwise identical.

The opening logos are different as well.

Those, and also I remember hearing that an entire reel was accidentally scanned out of focus which was fixed in/for 2019.

Well, yeah, but I feel like even that sort of difference would be easy to miss unless you’ve got sharp eyes.

I totally forgot about the Lucasfilm logo, though.

Post
#1536245
Topic
Return Of The Jedi's 40th anniversary
Time

ThatPixarGuy said:

SomethingStarWarsRelated said:

ThatPixarGuy said:

I’m seeing a 40th anniversary screening with some family and friends on Saturday. The theatrical cut would be preferable of course, but I’m just happy to see a good Star Wars film in theaters haha.

Was it ever clarified why Empire’s 40th anniversary screenings used the 2011 Blu-ray rather than the more recent 2019 transfer? Hopefully that won’t be the same case here…

Yes, I was just wondering this. Once you see it, could you let us know which version it is?

Sure!

The only thing that would really give it away is the color timing, as the 2011 and 2019 versions are basically otherwise identical.

Post
#1533653
Topic
A '<strong>Rumour and News</strong>' thread for reported new Star Wars films and tv series
Time

rocknroll41 said:

Fang Zei said:

rocknroll41 said:

Not sure if this has been discussed here yet but right now LFL is hoping to have the Rey movie ready for 2025 and the Filoni movie for 2026 and the Mangold movie for some time later (after he finishes his Bob Dylan movie):
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/star-wars-lucasfilm-rey-movie-mangold-filoni-1235371547/

Just to clarify, we don’t have any indication whatsoever right now as to when Filoni’s film will get made. 2026 was only listed in the context of the original plan circa late 2019.

Disney was going to alternate Avatar sequels and Star Wars movies on Christmas of odd and even numbered years respectively starting with Avatar 2 in 2021, but then the pandemic pushed everything back a year and Lucasfilm didn’t get anything ready for the big screen quickly enough.

2026 will be a crowded year for Disney as it is, with Avengers: Secret Wars in May and Avatar 4 at the end of the year. That doesn’t mean they can’t put out something some other time of the year, but I don’t know why they wouldn’t just wait lest they get a repeat of Solo.

Cameron already said that Avatar 4&5 might get delayed, and reports are saying that the MCU is about to enter a “slowdown” phase. I think we’re about to see a major reshuffling of the whole Disney schedule tbh.

Wouldn’t surprise me, but I’m also curious how they’re planning on handling the big 50th anniversary in 2027.

Post
#1533610
Topic
A '<strong>Rumour and News</strong>' thread for reported new Star Wars films and tv series
Time

rocknroll41 said:

Not sure if this has been discussed here yet but right now LFL is hoping to have the Rey movie ready for 2025 and the Filoni movie for 2026 and the Mangold movie for some time later (after he finishes his Bob Dylan movie):
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/star-wars-lucasfilm-rey-movie-mangold-filoni-1235371547/

Just to clarify, we don’t have any indication whatsoever right now as to when Filoni’s film will get made. 2026 was only listed in the context of the original plan circa late 2019.

Disney was going to alternate Avatar sequels and Star Wars movies on Christmas of odd and even numbered years respectively starting with Avatar 2 in 2021, but then the pandemic pushed everything back a year and Lucasfilm didn’t get anything ready for the big screen quickly enough.

2026 will be a crowded year for Disney as it is, with Avengers: Secret Wars in May and Avatar 4 at the end of the year. That doesn’t mean they can’t put out something some other time of the year, but I don’t know why they wouldn’t just wait lest they get a repeat of Solo.

Post
#1532963
Topic
Return Of The Jedi's 40th anniversary
Time

Servii said:

StarkillerAG said:

I saw the new poster for the rerelease on Reddit today. Right now, it’s one of the most active threads on the site, for a reason that I’m sure a lot of people here will be proud of: Pretty much all the comments are demanding a release of the theatrical OT.

As a member of the site that created the Despecialized versions, it was so satisfying to go through that thread and see all the people saying things like “Will this be the original version?”, or “I wish Disney would release the original versions”, or “This is why I only watch Despecialized”. There are even people spreading the news about the 4K77 project to people who think Despecialized is still the best option to see the original movies in HD.

I thought people had pretty much stopped caring about the theatrical OT, but I think this proves that there’s still a ton of demand. If Disney releases the original versions, people will watch them. It’s a shame that they probably won’t.

Yeah, it’s very telling of how many people care about seeing the original movies. It flies in the face of the claim that “Only a tiny vocal minority want those versions.” Many fans put up with the Special Editions, but if given the chance to buy remasters of the original cuts, they absolutely would.

George’s own friends Steven and Francis included all three versions of Close Encounters and Apocalypse Now on 4k. Even just last year the 4k rebuild of the director’s edition of Star Trek: The Motion Picture was released in a special deluxe edition that included the “special longer version” originally cut together for home video in the 80’s along with the 1979 original, both also in 4k.

Even if they never want to release the older versions in theaters again, they’ll eventually run out of ways to repackage the same altered movies to us again and again on home video.

Also, it’s rather uncool of them to commission such a retro poster meant to evoke 1983 when we all know it once again won’t be that version.

Post
#1532557
Topic
A '<strong>Rumour and News</strong>' thread for reported new Star Wars films and tv series
Time

rocknroll41 said:

RogueLeader said:

And it comes out tomorrow! Doesn’t seem like it will be a big thing, “Grogu and the Dust Bunnies”. A cute little short. But maybe we will see more if there is a lot of positivity around it.
Also, rocknroll, do you know how many of these projects have been officially confirmed by Lucasfilm and how many are reports? I feel like it is a running gag at this point about how Lucasfilm announces a project only for it to go nowhere, but I am curious how many of those are just insider reporting. I mean, it isn’t unusual for filmmakers to work on projects with studios only for them to never get off the ground, but regardless it seems like there are a high number of them coming out of Lucasfilm.

These are the only ones Lucasfilm announced directly:

Rian Johnson’s trilogy
Kevin Feige’s movie that Michael Waldron is writing
Taika Waititi’s movie (rumored to be a loose Dawn of the Jedi adaptation)
Rogue Squadron (originally for 2023 but now delayed indefinitely like everything else)

(from November)

Since it turns out Mangold is directing Dawn of the Jedi, I wonder what Waititi’s film is actually about.