logo Sign In

Fang Zei

User Group
Members
Join date
14-Oct-2006
Last activity
9-Dec-2025
Posts
2,798

Post History

Post
#297696
Topic
2007 DVD repackage
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297696/action/topic#297696
Time
Plus there was "30th anniversary" on all of the toy boxes. Maybe they honestly decided that was enough for this year, not that next year won't now also be crowded but maybe they decided it was the lesser of two evils in terms of when to publish The Force Unleashed and therefore the dvd set. Also, look at just how these videogames have gone along with dvd's. Battlefront spanned Episodes I, II, IV, V and VI and was released day and date with the '04 set, meaning it spanned all of the movies that had been released onto dvd thus far. The big deal about Battlefront II was all the new stuff from Revenge of the Sith, which was released onto dvd the same day. Then there's the GOUT with coincided with a Lego game centered only around the original trilogy.

Now I could just be setting myself up for major disappointment and probably am, but since Force Unleashed takes place between the trilogies maybe that's how marketing will tie in the boxset. Of course, it will probably be no different from the way Shadows of the Empire handled things, taking its time in the sun until something else came along a few months later (the '97 SE). 2008 will probably be similar, first Force Unleashed in the Spring and then The Clone Wars in the Fall returning Star Wars to the small screen after a long absence just as the SE returned it to the big screen after a long absence.

But I dunno, this is just me theorizing that they wouldn't release a new dvd set without a new videogame and just figured they couldn't wedge in the grand multimedia event of The Force Unleashed when there's a 30th anniversary toys/ comics/ books sale already going on. We'll just have to wait and see what really happens.
Post
#297571
Topic
George Lucas to host showing of Star Wars "1977" for AFI's 40th anniversary.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297571/action/topic#297571
Time
The way I see it, if Lucas does eventually do an SE of the prequels it won't be to go along with the SE of the OT. That's what the original version of the PT was for. So basically it won't be like two totally separate versions of the entire six film saga that follow parallel paths, they will connect in a criss cross pattern. If and when he remasters the OOT, he can do an SE of the PT that goes along better with that. Of course he'll also include his PT and the latest SE of the OT as well. Sorry if I sound like a broken record with my constant suggestion of what the ultimate dvd / high def release should be, I just find it unlikely that GL would give the OT anything more than equal treatment to the PT.
Post
#297467
Topic
George Lucas to host showing of Star Wars "1977" for AFI's 40th anniversary.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297467/action/topic#297467
Time
I wasn't even born until 1985 so I'm one step ahead of you there, sj. It's for that reason above all that I want a high definition transfer of the OOT. At least a whole lot of you older folks actually got to see it in the highest quality possible.

As for the unending rumors that Lucas destroyed every original print he could get his hands on, do we even know if this is true? The form response letter to all of our GOUT complaints back in May of '06 said "existing prints are in bad condition." So while they probably did try to get their hands on every O-OT print, would they really have a good reason to destroy them?
Post
#297382
Topic
George Lucas to host showing of Star Wars "1977" for AFI's 40th anniversary.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297382/action/topic#297382
Time
Originally posted by: COI am watching the list of movies that are coming out in the first two years of HDDVD, and it is almost exactly the list of DVD titles in 1997/98/99.


Yea I noticed that also, Dune and The Thing being the most obvious. This brings up something else I was going to say, and that is Star Wars didn't hit dvd in any form until 2004. The same kind of thing happened back in the vhs/beta days, but that was because home video hadn't nudged theatrical exhibition aside as much. Jedi, for example, was re-released in '85 before it first hit home video in '86. LFL only reissued the SE vhs once and that was 2000, but then again it was getting plenty of revenue from the first two prequels between then and '04. So, as has been said, with no more Star Wars movies on the way LFL will need something special to sell us next time around.

In regards to the AFI thing I think the 121 minute running time may just be them trying to be consistent in their lies, although we've already pointed out the incorrect title of "Episode IV: A New Hope" from 1981 and not 1977, so who knows.
Post
#297379
Topic
George Lucas to host showing of Star Wars "1977" for AFI's 40th anniversary.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297379/action/topic#297379
Time
"I've brought a film print of the original release to screen for all of you tonight. There's an anamorphic dvd enhanced for 16:9 television sourced from a high definition restoration that's available, but this particular version I'm showing tonight is only available to buy in a non-anamorphic dvd that is not enhanced for 16:9 television sourced from a transfer done in 1993."

Seriously folks, you know why I'm not ruling out the possibility of the OOT getting nicely remastered someday? The Graduate only just got an anamorphic Region 1 dvd release last week, and in this past year we've seen several other notable films receive anamorphic transfers for the very first time (Dune, Brazil, The Doors). There's even a rumor that The Abyss won't get remastered until it hits blu-ray, and the same probably goes for a lot of the other movies still on dvd without an anamorphic transfer (Conan the Destroyer, I'm looking squarely at you).

Perhaps all the GOUT ultimately boils down to is LFL's desire to make a quick dollar. It's sad and petty, but not impossible.

The big question in my mind is whether LFL and Fox might decide to accelerate their plans, so to speak, now that Paramount has gone hd-dvd exclusive. If Paramount starts releasing some of their really big catalog titles on hd-dvd within the next year and half (after which they are expected to go format neutral again), the blu-ray exclusive studios will need to fire back with their own titles. As some of you people have said, even a high definition disc release of the holy Star Wars trilogy would need more selling points than simply owning a 1080p transfer of the '04 SE. With the original versions of Close Encounters and Blade Runner, films from the OT's very same era, now being faithfully preserved for all eternity in 1080p24, maybe it's time LFL stepped up to the plate and really deliver something amazing. The '06 release gave us absolutely nothing that hadn't already been released. If they're going to release anything worth hyping, they should go all out and wow us.
Post
#297316
Topic
George Lucas to host showing of Star Wars "1977" for AFI's 40th anniversary.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297316/action/topic#297316
Time
I'm pretty sure Lucas did in fact get the rights to the original film starting in 1995 with the Faces THX-certified "one last time" release although I could be wrong and it may have happened earlier. Looking at my three official copies of ANH right hurr, the '95 vhs reads "Copyright '77 Fox Corporation. All rights reserved. Trademark and copyright '77 Lucasfilm Limited. Reserved (I'm assuming that's what the R with the circle around it means), trademark and copyright 1995 Lucasfilm Limited. All Rights Reserved. Used Under Authorization."

The '97 vhs reads "Reserved, Trademark and Copyright 1977 & 1997 Lucasfilm Limited. All Rights Reserved. Used Under Authorization."

The '04 dvd reads "Reserved, Trademark and Copyright 1977, 1997 and 2004 Lucasfilm Limited. All Rights Reserved. Used Under Authorization. 'Star Wars' and all associated characters, logos and other elements are the property of Lucasfilm Limited."
Post
#297255
Topic
George Lucas to host showing of Star Wars "1977" for AFI's 40th anniversary.
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297255/action/topic#297255
Time
Originally posted by: none
Thanks for the heads up. Here's my e-mail:

Hello, you've got on your website (http://www.afi.com/tvevents/40th//) a mention that you will be playing:

"Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope (1977)"

This movie never existed. If you are intending to play "Star Wars: Episode IV..." then that would be the rerelease from 1981.

I sincerely hope you don't fraudulently advertise playing the 1977 "Star Wars" but actually play the 1997 Special Editions at your ceremony, that would be tragic.


Very clever of you to point that out, none. I actually didn't know what you meant until I read it a second time and realized it's the combination of the subtitle "Episode IV: A New Hope" with the year 1977 that's fraudulent, not the existence of a version of "Star Wars" in 1977, so props to you.

I also heard about this recently on Access Hollywood or something while flipping between tv channels and asked the exact same self-answering question, "yea, but will it be the '77 version?" Not a chance in hell.

An interesting question is how will this be exhibited? Since this is AFI I would hope they'd at least use the High Def master from '04 if not an actual print from '97.
Post
#297127
Topic
A question about NTSC telecine
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297127/action/topic#297127
Time
Well it would technically be 23.976 to 24 or 29.97 to 30 but I think you already get my point. There was an article on wiki about moving image formats and how it is apparently possible to speed up 23.976 fps video to 24, it just didn't say how this could be accomplished.

In regards to the whole refresh rate / frame rate confusion, whenever I watch HD quicktime trailers the info says it's a 23.98 fps file but it's playing at 24.00. So again, I don't quite understand what the computer is doing.
Post
#297046
Topic
A question about NTSC telecine
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/297046/action/topic#297046
Time
another question,

Does PowerDVD automatically speed up NTSC dvd's to 30 fps? The reason I ask is that whenever I play dvd's in PowerDVD, the configuration says that the framerate is 30.00 per second. That's being pretty precise. Also, computer monitors can't display such a precise framerate as 29.97, so doesn't it have to speed it up to a rounded number like 30? Also, from time to time and depending on the soundscape of the movie, I've noticed a certain distortion in the audio of my dvd's while playing them in PowerDVD that I don't notice while playing them on a tv. Maybe it's just that my ears are noticing the lossy compression but I was wondering if it's actually the sped up audio.

Something I just remembered that might make my assumption incorrect is that my old roommate would hook up his nice 128megabyte video card on his computer to my small as hell sony trinitron tv so we could watch dvd's, and if it was a different framerate it wouldn't have worked on both his computer monitor and my tv at the same time, right?
Post
#296370
Topic
The Music of Star Wars: 30 Anniversary Collection
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/296370/action/topic#296370
Time
It's almost like they're doing the exact same thing for the soundtracks of the OT as they did for the DVD of the OOT. Slap the retro art on the cover to make you really, really want to buy it even though it's nothing new. Ok, correction, technically the GOUT was new in that the laserdisc had never been ported to dvd, I apologize.

I've never bought any release of the OT scores. A couple years back my roomate was lucky enough to find the original LP of Star Wars at the local books and music shop. Needless to say I was quite jealous (I don't even have a working vinyl player!), but on a separate occasion I found a first edition copy of ADF's ghost written Star Wars novelization there, so all is well.

Am I to understand this is the long rumored "complete John Williams scores" or is that still on the way? Also, this is being announced now for a November release. Anyone want to take bets on whether or not LFL will repackage the OT dvd's for a December release just like they did in '05?
Post
#296068
Topic
Blu-ray Disc or HD-DVD?
Link
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/296068/action/topic#296068
Time
Even if downloadable movies take over, that won't make them better in quality than BD or HD-DVD. There's not much higher you can go in home video than 1080p, and it's taking people long enough just to upgrade to HDTV. By any other logic, we'll be turning around and doing that all over again in 15 to 20 years when something better, presumably 2k or 4k televisions, become available. Is there any evidence that it will actually happen?

This competition between the two formats is so intense because the studios realize that high def is it for home video, at least for quite a long while.