logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#556802
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

The Terror (1963)

The story doesn't quite make sense in many places, Jack Nicholson's acting is inconsistent, and the image quality of my copy isn't that great. Despite all that it has beautiful cinematography, haunting atmosphere, and is directed by Roger Corman, my favourite director. I give it 6/10.

Post
#556800
Topic
Get anything for Christma- I mean, for the holidays? Brag here!
Time

Warbler said:



DuracellEnergizer said:
Since my family adheres to <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">cultic lies</span> True Christianity, Christmas isn't observed in my household. I did buy myself the eighth season of The Simpsons on DVD, though, so it's almost all good.


I don't understand, you say your family adheres to True Christianity, yet they won't celebrate the birth of Christ?


My family believes Christmas to be a pagan holiday that "True Christians" don't celebrate because God doesn't like anything associated with paganism. My dad even believes Christmas is short for "Christ massacre" - a load of BS, I know.

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said: <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">cultic lies</span>


*sigh*  now, if I had said this in reference to the Islam or Jewish religion, what would the reaction have been?  Lets say a celebrity said this about Islam or the Jewish religion, what would the reaction have been?  I'm going to bet that he'd/she'd be labeled a bigot.   Why is it ok to insult my religion, when it isn't to do the same to the others?  DuracellEnergizer, was it really necessary to use those words? 

I have no problem with someone who doesn't believe in Christ, but I do have a problem with people insulting my religion. 


You misunderstand. I'm not referring to mainstream Christianity but the pseudo-Christian cult theology founded by the false prophet Herbert W. Armstrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_W._Armstrong


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrongism

Post
#555217
Topic
The thread where we make enemies out of friends, aka the abortion debate thread
Time

darth_ender said:



DuracellEnergizer said:

I used to be a firm anti-abortionist. In my POV abortion was to be avoided at all costs unless there was absolute 100% certainty that neither mother nor child would be able to survive pregnancy.

After I began to doubt my religious convictions my views began to grow progressively more liberal, until I finally lost all faith in my religion and did a complete 180.

These days I consider myself a firm antinatalist.



So if I am to understand you correctly, you are  completely opposed to birth, and thus favor human extinction?  I know you've got a bizarre sense of humor, so I'm going to assume you're kidding with your last sentence.


This time I'm being serious.

It doesn't show much in my posts here, usually because I don't often like to bring it up, but far too many things have happened to me in recent years that have left me very much a "glass-is-half-empty" type of person. Humans have gone from being wayward caretakers in my eyes to being glorified locusts that selfishly eat away at everything - and everyone - around them.

I'm not happy being a misanthrope, a pessimist, or - I'm sad to say - a nihilist. But that's the way the dice rolled, and short of some higher power showing up to prove me wrong, there's nothing that can be done to change how I feel.

Post
#555056
Topic
The thread where we make enemies out of friends, aka the abortion debate thread
Time

I used to be a firm anti-abortionist. In my POV abortion was to be avoided at all costs unless there was absolute 100% certainty that neither mother nor child would be able to survive pregnancy.

After I began to doubt my religious convictions my views began to grow progressively more liberal, until I finally lost all faith in my religion and did a complete 180.

These days I consider myself a firm antinatalist.

Post
#554864
Topic
Yoda: CGI vs Puppet
Time

nightstalkerpoet said:


It's been a while since I've watched ESB, so I just sat down and finally watched my bluray copy. I have to say that as a fan of all six films (they each have their flaws, but I try and love them anyways), the original Puppet is slightly underwhelming to me.

Some of the scenes with him are very well done, typically close up talking shots. Scenes where he is not the focal point are pretty disappointing though. It is hard to understand why, with as many things as they attempted to fix, they couldn't make Yoda look less like a floppy ragdoll during a lot of Lukes training.

I have a lot respect for the original films and film making techniques, but I do feel that it is perfectly acceptable to replace outdated effects... 

For a lot of people, the replacement of the TPM puppet with the CGI version was a welcome change.

Without fear of being bashed (and please people, don't bash opinions on this) does anyone think that the Yoda in the OT could be replaced in a way that would improve the films? Keep in mind, this is assuming the CGI is done well and is well integrated not to stand out.


I'm not an alcoholic. However, sometimes I suffer a negative reaction to an outside source and just feel like burning the negative emotions away with a blitz of booze.

This is one of those times.