DuracellEnergizer

^Latest reply EVER.

^What a slappable face that is.

^WRONG CONCLUSION!!!

you married to the Cryptkeeper?

spam from World War I

Nice?! NICE!? Do you realize how many mes out there happen to be murderers, rapists, and furries?!?! Too many!!!

^You left out the whores and misogyny.

^Pics or it didn't happen.

can double as stiletto knives

generalfrevious said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

generalfrevious said:

Superman vs Batman: Dawn Of Justice will easily become the highest grossing film of next year in spite of being equivalent to watching newsreel footage of WWII atrocities.

Comparing what is bound to be a soulless piece of crap with historical film footage of educational value?

 I only made that comparison in the first place because Zack Snyder put facist undertones in Man Of Steel. I didn't resort to Godwin's law out of a whim.

*sigh* Now I'm forced to use a meme from the Nolan Batman films, and I hate referencing those movies.

If this is a block universe -- with all points in the past, present, and future co-existing at once in the sea of eternity -- then the question is meaningless; neither the chicken nor the egg came first.

imperialscum said:

Films are an art and therefore film maker should be first and foremost an artist. A true artist follows his/her vision with disregard to popularity and people's tastes. A film maker who makes stuff in a way so that people will like it is not an artist but a salesman or an attention whore.

So, seeing as Lucas cut down on Jar Jar's screentime with each prequel as a result of negative public opinion on the character, does that make him an artist or a salesman?

I for one wouldn't mind seeing nudity in a SW film as long as it was done naturalistically. After all, uncovered boobs and butts don't have to lead into or follow sex.

RicOlie_2 said:

As for swearing, there's "kriff" and several that are intended to sound like "frick" and the F-word.

And let's not forget the infinitely moronic "bastarve".

To gobble-gobble-gobble, like a turkey.

Isn't there another, older philosophy thread buried somewhere in the mire of this forum? 

CounterpartS, you multiversally challenged imbecile. There are googolplex of other mes in a googolplex of other timelines, and I am attuned to at least a billion of them.

generalfrevious said:

But to stay on topic, didn't Peter Jackson do to the Hobbit what Orci and Kurtzman did to Star Trek, turning thought provoking works into mindless action schlock? Is anyone afraid that Jackson could spend the rest of his life butchering the rest of Tolkien's work in the same vein?

If someone butchers something you love, you butcher them right back -- through art!

Neglify said:

^wut

Sorry. My counterpart in another timeline suffered a stroke and the effects reverberated through hypertime to affect me here. 

Yes, but not all of us will end up going to Heaven. Some of us will end up in Hell, where we'll be forced to watch the PT over-and-over again for all of eternity.

Ah, but frevious thinks everyone'll be dead in 100 years, so it's a moot point to him.

Jason Statham isn't an actor -- he's a big slab of raw meat perched atop two blocks of wood.

generalfrevious said:

Superman vs Batman: Dawn Of Justice will easily become the highest grossing film of next year in spite of being equivalent to watching newsreel footage of WWII atrocities.

Comparing what is bound to be a soulless piece of crap with historical film footage of educational value?

I am now trying to picture what a Star Wars movie directed by Frank Miller would be like ...

That, or he's being sarcastic.

With imperialscum, it's next to impossible to tell. The guy's a living incarnation of Poe's law.