logo Sign In

DuracellEnergizer

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
30-May-2010
Last activity
30-Dec-2020
Posts
24,211

Post History

Post
#747873
Topic
Flaws, plotholes, and "could-have-been-done-betters" in the OT (alternate plot points especially welcome)
Time

NeverarGreat said:

It was never clear to me that the second impact was a meteorite. In fact, since it appeared to be the exact same shot as before but from a different angle, I always (since I first saw ESB when I was five) thought that it was the same probe droid impact, simply edited to show that Luke saw it as well.

That's what I thought as well.  

Post
#747766
Topic
Episode III: Revenge of the Ridiculousness
Time

Dreams are dreams -- they don't have to make sense.

Of course, taking into consideration the whole "forced celibacy" thing the Jedi have going on and all the sexual frustration that must arise from that, I wouldn't be surprised if Annie's subconscious mind pulled up images of usually-chaste nuns giving in to their primal sexuality during sleep. 

Post
#747765
Topic
Flaws, plotholes, and "could-have-been-done-betters" in the OT (alternate plot points especially welcome)
Time

Ronster said:

Bingowings said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

^I think you've watched TESB too many times for all the wrong reasons.

 Or maybe not enough.

It's clearly explained in the film that there has been a lot of meteorite activity so the second impact is one of those.

The so called teleportations and casual strolls are just editing for dramatic reasons.

 Bingo the shooting script has the probe droid appearing after luke get's dragged off by the Wampa.

That means that the meteorite was clearly meant to be the probe droid and because Luke was attacked he failed to check it out so it got away.

Authorial intent doesn't matter. What matters is what is shown directly on the screen, and what is shown directly on the screen is up to personal interpretation.