Remember when we were considered the fan fringe just for asking if we could get a restored OOT? My how times have changed!
The amount of dragging I’ve seen on twitter over this is next level. Absolutely hilarious. I also love the totally real and not at all fake $16.9mil that they have already raised for it.
Just saw JP5:JW2:FK1. Thought it wasn’t bad actually. On the high end of the sequels.
Moving somewhere else just because you can’t find a date seems pretty extreme to me. And I dated before computers existed so it seems even more extreme now.
That wasn’t really what I was suggesting though. Handman has been saying that he doesn’t have friends largely because of where he lives. So I presented a possible option. The biggest reasons for or against that option are largely things that I don’t know.
Move somewhere else. Take better pictures of yourself.
This isn’t an option unless I uproot everything I’ve done this past year.
Fair enough. But it is an option.
Also, there’s nothing worse for online dating than a selfie. The damn word is just so stupid.
I didn’t say take a selfie. That would be a worse picture.
Six months after TLJ was pushing it. I just hope the window of opportunity to bring Ewan back as Obi Wan isn’t lost in the process. He seems to be a busy fellow.
He’s aging pretty well. I think he’s still far off enough from Guinness that we shouldn’t worry.
I’m sure he’s fine, I meant scheduling wise. Solo had to replace an actor for the reshoots since they were committed to another project after the initial shoot. Actors can be tied up for years that way.
That’s probably less of an issue. With reshoots it can be a problem because of last minute scheduling. One would imagine if a Kenobi movie came to pass there’d be enough lead in time to make sure he could fit it in.
I like one movie a year but I like movies and like SW. One movie a year really doesn’t seem that overwhelming.
I don’t mind it either but for general audiences it’s possibly too much. Most franchises usually have at least a couple years in between installments. Hype for new Star Wars used to be built long waits.
By “his son’s” do you mean “his brother-in-law’s”?
Six months after TLJ was pushing it. I just hope the window of opportunity to bring Ewan back as Obi Wan isn’t lost in the process. He seems to be a busy fellow.
He’s aging pretty well. I think he’s still far off enough from Guinness that we shouldn’t worry.
definitely for the better, imo.
Glad it was this that got put on hold and not the Johnson/Benioff+Weiss stuff. That stuff is actually (supposedly) taking SW to new places.
Seems like they’ve hit pause on this and Kenobi after Solo’s underperformance:
http://collider.com/star-wars-spinoffs-on-hold/
Which is probably smart. The truth is probably that movies based on single characters were always going to be something of a tough bet, because there isn’t much of a precedence for this (whereas with superhero solo films those characters already have built in solo recognition). At the very least they need to adjust their expectations going forward - not every movie with the SW name on it will make a billion just because - and scale down these productions if they want to go forward with them at some point.
My wild prediction is that, if we do see these spin-offs resume, they’ll be on Disney’s streaming platform. I think part of the problem is that people just aren’t crazy about one SW theatrical film a year, which probably shouldn’t be a surprise, considering everyone got mad about that when it was announced in 2012/13. Again, the only precedent is really Marvel, and I guess the lesson is that SW is not Marvel, for better or worse.
Weird to say someone is “no Feige” when Feige is one of the few who’s even attempted it so far and had done nothing prior to it that would’ve suggested he could.
That being said, Kurtzman did kill the “Dark Universe,” so maybe there is a point there.
Correct. We know he tried and failed. The only question is if the failure of the Mummy and therefore of Dark Universe is ONLY his fault or if the studio interfered too much
Well Kurtzman directed the film in addition to producing, so there was a level of quality control there that Feige has never had. Anyone who’s seen the film will tell you the reason the Dark Universe failed was because the movie just plain sucked. There are elements there that could potentially come down to interference, but I think it was going to be bad regardless.
Weird to say someone is “no Feige” when Feige is one of the few who’s even attempted it so far and had done nothing prior to it that would’ve suggested he could.
That being said, Kurtzman did kill the “Dark Universe,” so maybe there is a point there.
Move somewhere else. Take better pictures of yourself.
How did we get into a video game discussion in the politics thread?
Anyway, I think there should be some WWII games that do it accurately and some that do imaginary WWII stuff.
MFM’s problem is the ones inbetween. The ones that are just kinda sorta maybe somewhat accurate.
I don’t agree though that adherence to historical accuracy need be binary. I do agree that people are stupid, and that corporations market to stupid people because stupid people have money, but it’s the stupid people who are ruining society not the entertainment made for them.
It’s cyclical since the video game market apparently has shifted to desire ahistorical crap so obviously the entertainment will reflect that, but I blame the entertainment too. I think it’s done in this case for PC points. The reception to the trailer was largely negative.
My point is, if you want to make a game about a weird awesome lady with a cybernetic arm and blue face paint that fights Nazis, then make an Inglourious Basterds type game that throws historical accuracy out the window. That would be great and I’d probably buy it, but don’t do a WWII setting that’s just faithful enough to the time period to make it somewhat grounded in reality and then add shit that makes it totally ahistorical. It’s stupid. It’s lazy.
It’s a fucking fictional game. Get over yourself. Why does it have to be one thing or the other? Why can’t it just be?
Respawning is historically inaccurate.
I don’t play online multiplayer. In the games I’m talking about you’d have to just restart the level when you got killed. I know that games aren’t reality, but I prefer them to at least make an honest attempt at resembling the historical period that they’re attempting to portray. If they aren’t going to try, then make a game that doesn’t need to be historically accurate, like a Wolfenstein.
That’s silly. Games are silly. Who cares. Don’t play it if it bothers you so much.
Respawning is historically inaccurate.
If I remember correctly, the estimate was 6% of priests.
It better be good, I’m agreeing to see it tomorrow so I can have beer and popcorn at the movies.
It’s very good.
My favorite sex position is quantum superposition.
My least favourite sex position is when you’re in the awkward position of talking to a transsexual and accidentally refer to straight people as “normal.”
Lot to unpack here.
are you, mr. cobb, aware that the pigmen in rotj were actually put to sleep by luke rather than choked?
Choked? Who would have ever thought that? They were clearly in need of a good long nap.
well i thought that the skb fired and charged through the same hole until now. weird.
Are you also aware that the trench with the exhaust port in ANH is not the equatorial trench where ships enter and leave?
Online dating is a real hit or miss type thing and it largely comes down to luck and location. It’s also basically useless if you don’t live near a big city, unless you get really lucky
It’s probably a lot less hit and a lot more miss when you have social anxiety and rely on someone messaging you first to break the ice.
Bumble isn’t the only dating app.
Treasure Island (1950)
Been playing a lot of Sea of Thieves of late. It got me in a very piratey mood. So what better way to indulge than to partake in a classic? This was Disney’s first ever live action film and it’s a great one. If you’ve never seen it, I recommend it!
Just started watching that actually (got halfway through before I had to do something, will finish soon).
Film is a collaborative medium though so comparing Lucas to the Beatles isn’t quite fitting (for that and many other reasons). Plus Star Wars was built as a pastiche throwback that added onto existing myths and genres, so it seems perfectly natural and fitting (moreso than even in other franchises) that people would take up the tradition and continue the series without him.
(Which is to say nothing of the fact that the last three [four if you count TCW] SW movies the man made are nowhere near the quality of the four that have since been made without him.)
Maybe the issue is that people are too quick to criticize her without understanding what they’re actually criticizing.