2112 - Rush

This is just an early grindhouse we’re talking about, though. If it was the final product, sure, 30-40GB is great! But this is the first release without a whole lot of work finished, so IMO it isn’t really worth all that internet usage to download a massive file that will inevitably be replaced and be made largely obsolete within a year.

I believe there was frequent posting of links etc.

Possessed said:

Meh

Mine’s too old too?

I think I’m the only one on this page right now with a “new” sig.

I’m guessing this means I’m still molesting children right now?

RU.08 said:

We can always produce versions further compressed to 20GB or 10GB @ 720p etc for people who want smaller file sizes.

Yeah, I don’t think I’d want to bother with something too large when it’s not the final product. 😄

I really don’t care what all it is as long as a 10-20GB down-convert is shared.

^PM sent.

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:

moviefreakedmind said:

no one cares about anything you’re saying.

Will you please refrain from referring to yourself as “no one”.

I’m pretty sure he speaks for everyone on this forum besides you and you don’t really count at all to be honest so “no one” was more or less accurate.

Or his real name is “no one”.

Kind of like this guy:

Neglify said:

Dek Rollins said:

I just realized that I have only actually seen one single Woody Allen film; Casino Royale (1967). I really like that film, so I guess I’ve molested children and never even knew it.

He only acted in it, he didn’t write or direct it. In my opinion you’ve seen zero Woody Allen films. You definitely have molested children though.

He was a starring role, so I would count it. And I’m pretty sure General Feverish was also referring to acting roles. That’s why I mentioned it.

I just realized that I have only actually seen one single Woody Allen film; Casino Royale (1967). I really like that film, so I guess I’ve molested children and never even knew it.

still a child

generalfrevious said:

Even re-watching an old Woody Allen film you already own IS A DELIBERATE ACT OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AGAINST CHILDREN.

Oh shut up.

Tyrphanax said:

Top Gear is great and I’m mad that it’s gone now.

I like the idea of “The Grand Tour”, I just hope that it’ll be as good.

Their new show should be just as good (if not better) than Top Gear was. They even have a massive budget from Amazon. The only thing that’s really a negative is that they no longer have The Stig.

Darth Lucas said:

But let’s be real, guys. VHS slipcases are tops.

QFT

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/413614

generalfrevious said:

Anyone who watches Cosby, Allen, Polanski, etc is endorsing sexual assault, and we need to erase those works out of existence, for the victims.

I frankly don’t care about Bill Cosby’s personal life and wrong doings. I’ll watch his shows and listen to his stand-up because he’s funny, not because he’s innocent.

generalfrevious said:

Even in 2016 women […] are just there for the sexual gratification of men at whatever age the man wants it to be.

And even in 2016 men are just there for the sexual gratification of women at whatever age the woman wants it to be.

You have no right to complain about a problem when you fail to acknowledge both sides.

Actually, standard 14mm DVD case is the best case. Though, some could argue that the Criterion 14mm BD cases are the best.

TV’s Frink said:

NOT FUNNY

JUST EH

OR MEH IF YOU PREFER

Well I thought it was pretty funny and ironic when reading your post! I won’t be voting for you now! 😛

Neglify said:

Fonz would be Ayyy

Yeah, I know; that part was just for the Funz.

TV’s Frink said:

EH

Like… didn’t get it? Or not funny enough? Or like:

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

Check your PM’s, ww12345.

LOWER CASE LETTERS

TV’s Frink said:

THIS ISNT A BABY

Yes it is! It’s Williarob’s 3ABY now.

delete

Papai2013 said:

…it’d be best if you can create a 19201660 resolution file instead of 12551080…
…downrez the corrected file to 1920*1660 (approx) and share it with us.

This, please! 😄

Also, how would you go about brightening the dark parts? Gamma correction? Because I would advise against just raising the brightness, because that would simply wash-out the image (blacks become grey, etc.).

I think the scenes would be best served by staying as dark as they are on the scan, but with as much crushed detail retrieved as possible without making the image literally brighter (I have zero knowledge about how possible this scenario is under the digital circumstances).