Davis

User Group: Members
Join date: 24-Apr-2005
Last activity: 18-Dec-2012
Posts: 214

Post History

Post: #145371
Topic: Personal Encounters?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/145371/action/topic#145371
Time: 4-Oct-2005 3:32 PM

I was just curious- has anyone on this forum ever personally met with another guy on this forum? I think it would be really neat if all the moderators met up, or all the fan editors got together at a convention or something.

Just wondering...have any of you ever met personally?

Post: #143915
Topic: BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/143915/action/topic#143915
Time: 1-Oct-2005 5:23 PM

Chaltab- I'm actually 15 now. I was 14 when I did the Girl Problem thread (not 13)- Just to clear it up.

Post: #143905
Topic: BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/143905/action/topic#143905
Time: 1-Oct-2005 4:06 PM

This is sick. I used to like this thread.

Post: #140152
Topic: What the heck is this?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/140152/action/topic#140152
Time: 21-Sep-2005 4:24 PM

What in the world?

I stumbled across this on the net. Out of curiosity, I read a little bit into it. What the heck is this "smoking fetish"? Some kind of disease that makes you want to take random pictures of people smoking on the street?

Does anyone know what this is?

Post: #139439
Topic: BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/139439/action/topic#139439
Time: 18-Sep-2005 8:07 PM

(don't want the thread to die out)

http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/286/untitled1xr.jpg

Post: #138292
Topic: Art Carney
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/138292/action/topic#138292
Time: 12-Sep-2005 4:51 PM

Sorry- I meant Art Carney. That was stupid of me. Too much "Honeymooners".

Post: #138288
Topic: Art Carney
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/138288/action/topic#138288
Time: 12-Sep-2005 4:45 PM

I love this guy. Not only that, he's in the SW universe because he starred in the Holiday Special!!!

Post: #137539
Topic: Books you would like to make into movies.
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/137539/action/topic#137539
Time: 8-Sep-2005 12:23 PM

The Eragon books would make good movies if they were done right.

Post: #136209
Topic: R.I.P. Chief Justice Rehnquist
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/136209/action/topic#136209
Time: 4-Sep-2005 7:25 AM

Quote
It's 2005 now, y'know... how's that hunt for Bin Laden coming along?

No clue. None of us do. And THAT'S what is wrong, not the fact that we went in to begin with. An uninformed public is dangerous.

The point is that it was NOT a mistake to go in there at first. Four years and many lives later, it IS a mistake to the best of my knowledge because we don't have any info- only dead soldiers.

Post: #136167
Topic: R.I.P. Chief Justice Rehnquist
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/136167/action/topic#136167
Time: 4-Sep-2005 3:41 AM

Quote
They just don't stop do they?

Yeah, darn it, Bush really has to stop killing these justices like that. He won't quit.

Quote
They overtook the white house, the courts, brainwashed over half the country, started a war, and now wish to conquer the world!

Typical liberal attitude. I'll respect your stupid opinion when you provide some basis in fact. Conquering the world

My simplified opinion: I think that we were right to go over and fight the terrorists/Taliban and bring them to justice. We DID NOT start the war- the suicidal Al-Quida maniacs did that. The fact that we've stayed over there for so long is troubling, however. If Bush has a reason for doing this (besides oil), he apparently doesn't trust the public with it and I don't like that. If I was the father of a soldier that was killed in Iraq, I would be EXTREMELY upset because I still wouldn't know what we were fighting for.

So I disagree with Bush on his handling of this. But I didn't say they "started a war and now wish to conquer the world"; nothing personal, but that's just plain stupid.

Post: #133105
Topic: Shot in the Dark
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/133105/action/topic#133105
Time: 24-Aug-2005 2:06 AM

What? They can't be making a NEW Pink Panther movie! Ridiculous.

I'm certainly not going to see it.

Post: #132948
Topic: Poll: who is hotter. Padme or Princess Leia
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/132948/action/topic#132948
Time: 23-Aug-2005 8:39 AM

I don't think there's really a contest here.

Post: #132727
Topic: Shot in the Dark
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/132727/action/topic#132727
Time: 22-Aug-2005 11:18 AM

This is one of the funniest movies ever made. I never get sick of watching it.

"Have you been...swimming?"
"Why yes- how did you know?"
"It is my business to know"

Post: #122640
Topic: Help Wanted: a bitmap of the original green 'Lucasfilm Limited' logo?
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/122640/action/topic#122640
Time: 12-Jul-2005 4:24 PM

Sorry for my ignorance- i can't get Adobe to load the AI file (or any other program).

Could someone tell me how to do it?

Post: #117130
Topic: MagnoliaFan Edits: Ep I "Balance Of The Force", and Ep II "The Clone War" (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/117130/action/topic#117130
Time: 21-Jun-2005 12:44 PM

Thanks

Post: #117126
Topic: MagnoliaFan Edits: Ep I "Balance Of The Force", and Ep II "The Clone War" (Released)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/117126/action/topic#117126
Time: 21-Jun-2005 12:41 PM

MagnoliaFan- awesome work! The podrace in Balance of the Force was especially incredible!

Does anyone know what music was used in that sequence? It didn't sound familiar to me. (not the famous SW fanfare, but the stuff before it).

Post: #117134
Topic: George Lucas says that the original versions of SW will probably be released on DVD
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/117134/action/topic#117134
Time: 21-Jun-2005 6:50 AM

Heck, I don't care why he releases it, only that he does.

Good news

Post: #114602
Topic: Info: A new edit (The Lost Cut - it was a prank; but some good info in here)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/114602/action/topic#114602
Time: 13-Jun-2005 11:17 AM

1. I should have said that he's a Greek immigrant in the U.S.
2. You really don't want to hook up with this guy.

Post: #114398
Topic: Rankings
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/114398/action/topic#114398
Time: 12-Jun-2005 3:59 PM

Please, Chaltab. Tell us about your girl situation (or lack of).

Post: #114085
Topic: Info: A new edit (The Lost Cut - it was a prank; but some good info in here)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/114085/action/topic#114085
Time: 11-Jun-2005 2:44 PM

I want to apologize to everyone in here for getting their hopes up. My friend is a moron with a really bad sense of humor. No, he does not have this “Lost Cut”- he doesn’t even have a recreation. I asked him for details about the disc, he asked why, and I told him I talked about it in this forum and that people were interested. He started laughing.

He made the whole thing up, and I’m so mad that I came on here and made a fool of myself because of it. I should have kept my mouth shut until actually seeing it for myself. He’s a member on this very forum- he’s a Greek guy who joined late last year. What an idiot.

I’m sorry, guys. I guess it doesn’t exist, then. Please...no hate mail. I'm sorry.

Post: #114235
Topic: Clubbing
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/114235/action/topic#114235
Time: 11-Jun-2005 2:39 PM

Evidence:

1. One posts immediately after the other
2. Note the extremely similar style that they use in terms of grammar. They both use the same incomplete sentences and inner-city slang.

Conclusion: Shimraa=Hot.like.fire

Post: #113283
Topic: Info: A new edit (The Lost Cut - it was a prank; but some good info in here)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/113283/action/topic#113283
Time: 8-Jun-2005 8:08 PM

Are you saying that you have (or your friend has) a copy of THE "Lost Cut" that was edited by John Jympson before he was fired and replaced by Richard Chew and Paul Hirsch?? I have heard rumors of Lost Cut bootlegs but I never believed them. Or is this a fan edit meant to replicate the Lost Cut? I wonder if this is actually Deleted Magic... or a joke.

The Lost Cut? I seem to remember hearing about that before. I assumed it wasn't, mostly because I thought the title was for a reason and it wasn't readily available.

Hmmm...Any WWII aerial combat footage standing in for unfinished FX shots in this thing?

I have no idea. I'll have to ask him.

I've never actually seen this disk. Once I get my burner running, I could ask him to borrow it and then burn a copy and send it to you to identify it. The only problem being that the disc is probably dual-layer and I only have a single layer burner. Maybe I could put it on two discs in different parts.

That would be the holy grail of holy grails. My God, I don't care what the quality is, and while we've seen some the footage...the entire lost cut...uh yeah, anyone here on this forum would give their first born to see that.

Wow- had no idea it was this rare. If it's what you think it is, which I don't know. It did seem weird that the editor would degrade the picture and the effects for a new edit- maybe it was an attempt to make it look old-fashioned.

But I repeat- I haven't seen this. I don't want to get your hopes up if it turns out to be fake.

Post: #112932
Topic: Info: A new edit (The Lost Cut - it was a prank; but some good info in here)
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/112932/action/topic#112932
Time: 7-Jun-2005 9:45 PM — Edited 2-Jul-2020 11:23 AM

A friend of mine says that he just got a DVD of a new edit of Star Wars from some dealer through the mail. He says it’s longer and it has different music and was edited by different people. He says that he wasn’t too happy with it because the editor (who calls himself John Jympson) put in a lot of extraneous scenes that slow the plot down. It was also irritating because the whole thing was in black-and-white; I told him he paid too much for it.

Apparently the quality is awful to begin with. However, I thought some of you fan-edit collectors might be interested because this is a lot longer than the original version and it has some new scenes. Han kisses someone else in this version, the end battle is all messed up, they put the original “furry” Jabba back in (probably from an SE documentary), Darth Vader’s voice is weird, and all the special effects look like cartoons (he says the lasers look like little arrows). Some edit! I’d rather watch the 2004 DVD’s (and that’s saying a lot).

But it has got some deleted scenes.

Post: #112184
Topic: ROTS: A particular movie...
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/112184/action/topic#112184
Time: 5-Jun-2005 12:54 PM

Guys, understand that the last thing I wanted was a thread discussing where to find bootlegs. I was just interested in differences between workprint and final film (and maybe digital version), that's all.

Quote

Quote
Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
Well, there's apparently a fourth, then, because MF hasn't said anything about the Russian. I suggest anyone who wants more info about this head over to that site.

STAR.WARS.EPISODE.III.Revenge.Of.The.Sith.INTERNAL.DVDRip.XviD Text

What on earth are you talking about? Who said anything about Star Wars?

Post: #112081
Topic: ROTS: A particular movie...
Link: https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/112081/action/topic#112081
Time: 5-Jun-2005 5:18 AM — Edited 22-Dec-2019 2:37 PM

So…let’s say that there’s a particular movie I was thinking about downloading (it’s about a guy that abuses his wife because he thinks that she betrayed him). I’m thinking about downloading it, but I’ve heard that there are 2 versions- a workprint version never released theatrically, and the theatrical version with no timer on the top of the picture.

Is there any difference whatsoever in the workprint version that would warrant a download? Visually, deleted scene-wise, incomplete FX-wise, music-wise, overall sound mix-wise; does anyone know whether there is more than one version of this “particular movie” at this point?