logo Sign In

Darth Lucas

User Group
Members
Join date
14-May-2013
Last activity
4-Mar-2025
Posts
1,719

Post History

Post
#916550
Topic
Harmy's Despecialized Star Wars 1977 - Color Adjustment Project for v2.7 (released)
Time

towne32 said:

DL: What did you have in mind for your V2 crawl? We’ve discussed the 1981 crawl before, but for the benefit of everyone else: I like what Darth Lucas has done in general. He got a cleaned up 1981 crawl from Harmy (I think originally from TN1?) and then used the ESB starfield and redid the pan and rotoscoped the flyover elements in.

V2 is going to be starting completely from scratch, instead of building off of Harmy’s crawl. Also 1080p since its as of now planned to accompany despecialized v3.0.

Working from the bluray, I’ll use the same technique as MikeVerta used for recreating his 77 crawl: taking screen grabs of each line of the crawl and then reconstructing the entirety of it in Photoshop. I will then place The 2D crawl in after effects over the 81 starfield and key frame it to follow the path and timing of the 81 crawl.

For the pandown and flyover I’ll utilize the same techniques as before, but working from a color corrected bluray in 1080p instead of from DeEd2.5 as before.

Post
#916207
Topic
Link: "New Darth Maul Fan Film Shows the Sith We All Deserve"
Time

There’s more to entertainment than just action and visually exciting things happening on screen. Not saying that’s the reason you weren’t entertained by them, but its a valid point. I’m sorry you weren’t too entertained by them, but we’re talking about telling stories here. The whole point was to illustrate that it is possible to tell a compelling story in a short amount of time.

Imagine something with the sense of action that this Darth Maul fan film had, but with an interesting story attached. I’d rather have a shorter action sequence amidst a compelling story, than a very large action sequence bookended by these framing devices that could have been developed into something more interesting.

Post
#916199
Topic
Star Wars Trilogy SE bluray color regrade (a WIP)
Time

Harmy said:

I’m simply saying, that just because this source fits what looks correct to you, doesn’t make it correct and that all other prints we’ve seen had the walls blue/green, so I don’t see what makes this one right, when it is the one that stands out among all the others.
And the JSC is definitelly red-shifted, as is the '93 THX master.

I’m not sure if this in reference to my prior posts or not. Either way I’ll address them as such. I certainly wasn’t saying these are perfectly correct. Only that if this is indeed a tech print, then there isn’t as much of a bias toward one particular color as there seems to be on other tech prints, and it backs up the idea that the walls should probably be less cyan/green than previously thought.
My personal belief is greyish with a subtle tone of cyan or blue depending on the shot.

Post
#916193
Topic
Harmy's Despecialized Star Wars 1977 - Color Adjustment Project for v2.7 (released)
Time

I believe he’s using Harmy’s 97. There is a noticeable gate weave in the crawl of my version that makes it jump around somewhat distractingly from the starfield. I understand him using the 97 crawl as it’s a more pleasant casual viewing experience.

I’ve said it before, watch mine if 1981 accuracy means that much to you, but if you just want ANH in the crawl, go with Towne32’s.

Post
#916185
Topic
Star Wars Trilogy SE bluray color regrade (a WIP)
Time

I actually do see a bit of red shifting. Nothing major, but it is there. You have to hunt for the red tones in the shadows to really see them.

The walls certainly shouldn’t be perfectly grey, but just much less green than I’ve seen lately. It should read as grey but have subtle cyan or blue tones depending on the scene, since, as we’ve established, the wall color is different from set to set.

Still, as far as faded prints go, this is in pretty damn good shape regardless of if it’s tech or not. I think it’s a good reference, but as I’ve stated before, there should never be a time when we’re trying to match ONE reference alone, but rather look for what is consistent between references and try to find a natural looking medium between them all.

I don’t think there is such a thing as a BAD reference. There are inaccurate references, but since they are all derived from a common ancestor, every reference we can get our hands on can tell us something about the original colors, even if the reference itself is wildly off. No such thing as too much information to draw from.