logo Sign In

Darth Lucas

User Group
Members
Join date
14-May-2013
Last activity
4-Mar-2025
Posts
1,719

Post History

Post
#953662
Topic
Help Wanted: Star Wars The Force Awakens: 1986 Edition
Time

MonkeyChicken said:

littlev87 said:

I’ve had this same problem, no idea why it happens. I gave up on my editing experiments because of it. If you figure it out let me know.

edit:
though now that I think about it, I read some where that it might be either what program you use to convert file types or what file type you convert to. Are you using MP4?

I am working with AVI files, and even before I render them they’re screwing up.

I don’t really know how to help you without basically sitting right next to you and watching your process through to see where you’re going wrong. Sorry man.

Post
#953439
Topic
Help Wanted: Star Wars The Force Awakens: 1986 Edition
Time

MonkeyChicken said:

Hey, I’ve been having a problem with After Effects, and I decided to finally give in and ask for help.

Here’s the problem: For my edit of TFA, I need to mask around certain laser blasts and Lightsabers, but for some reason my masks will come out of sync at random times. All of my comps are at the same frame rate, and I mask each individual frame. Nowhere else online have I seen someone else have this problem, so I have to ask this thread.

Help me OriginalTrillogy, you’re my only hope!

If you’re masking and key framing every individual frame, then I don’t see how it could go out of sync.

Post
#953393
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

DarkChili said:

So the 81 crawl still has the whole frame bounce right after the 20th Century Fox logo. Also the crawl itself just looks off. The Star Wars logo gets more and more aliased the more it fades into the background. Also right when it’s about to fade out, it looks like a different mini star field, much more dense with stars, shows up, then after the logo’s faded out, then THAT part of the star field starts fading out, then the logo pops back up for 5 or so frames before finally disappearing again. I thought the frame bounce would’ve been fixed with 1.6, but I don’t know what to say about the 81 crawl itself. Was it that bad in the theaters?

The mini starfield is an error on my part. I just checked to see what you were talking about. That’s a carryover from my pervious version which had a different starfield. It’s a recreation, and sometimes these things slip through the cracks. Nonetheless I’m glad you caught it. I’m not sure if williarob will consider it worth re-encoding and rebuilding, but either way, I’ll fix that at my earliest convenience.

Post
#953150
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

Williarob said:

clutchins said:

Should Team Blu work on ESB and ROTJ 35mm, would they still call them Silver Screen Edition?

I don’t know. It would be nice to have a “Silver Screen Trilogy”, but at the same time it’s probably wise to distinguish Team Blu’s work from that of TN1… And with Harmy and Dre on board, perhaps “Ultimate Edition” would be a better title.

I would have to change the name of my project haha but I’d gladly do so if the name goes to a much more worthy project.

Post
#953001
Topic
My review of Episode III (minor, minor spoilers)
Time

NeverarGreat said:

It will be interesting to look back on our first impressions of TFA in a decade.

I would imagine a lot of the “problems” I give a pass and even defend now, may not sit as well with me in a decade, but we’ll see. I’m sure I’ll always have fond memories of TFA, just as I have fond memories of ROTS, even though I quite dislike the movie with the benefit of hindsight.

Post
#952967
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

negative1 (Power User) at 2016-06-13 16:51:23 GMT - [Quote]

Ok, so negative 1 is writing something.

…There are other members, including me, Rogue1,…

Still negative 1.

Negative1 has no involvement with these posts, or these phases of the project.

Rogue1

Oh… So now it’s Rogue1?

Last edited by negative1 at 2016-06-13 16:58:46 GMT

And back to being negative 1.

Are you negative 1 or Rogue1? Make up your mind!

Post
#952956
Topic
Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition HD - V2.7 - MKV (Released)
Time

I think a lot of us are not unwelcoming, but rather just a little weary of new users simply because a lot of what we do rides a very fine line between fair use and piracy, and one person who isn’t understanding or following the protocols we’ve set in place can easily mess it up for everyone. All it takes is one notice to Harmy, or towne32, or poita, or Adywan, etc, from lucasfilm/Disney/fox and we all can’t do these kinds of projects anymore. Or at least we couldn’t share them.

So when someone who we don’t know if we can trust or not comes in acting so unlike you’d expect a new user to, we are I think understandably a little defensive.

Post
#951351
Topic
team negative1 - star wars 1977 - 35mm theatrical version (Released)
Time

dark_jedi said:

We cannot wait for this Williarob, now get it done so we can move on to bigger and better things lol.

I got permission from the negative 1 group to post this Team Blu announcement here so here goes.

Hello everyone on OT!

Today I’m very happy to announce that Harmy, Williarob, schorman13 and DrDre are joining Team Blu!
Their combined knowledge, skill and passion will be a great addition to the team as well as to the quality of future releases, now this really, really has created some fantastic opportunities for us, and will be passed on to all of you.

Stay tuned!

*edit, I deleted the info about our own SW projects, that was not important in this thread, sorry.

😮

Post
#950909
Topic
Info & Ideas: ESB and ROTJ Wishlist
Time

ray_afraid said:

Bingowings said:

  1. Leia remembers Padme…but how? One easy fix could be that when she refers to “images” she produces a locket with a picture of her mother and gives it Luke, something regal that Bail Organa may have given her when she was a little girl.

I really like this.
I’m usually against putting ANYTHING from the PT into the OT, but this really works without you having to have even seen the PT. You’ll know who the lady is via the current conversation.
I think Mark and Carrie look down enough times in the scene to make the locket inserts work.

Just spitballing here but maybe instead of a locket it could be the necklace thing anakin gave padme?

Post
#950776
Topic
Darth Vader's suit
Time

yotsuya said:

Anchorhead said:

yotsuya said:
When you investigate where the name came from, it is almost impossible to ignore Dark Father and the implication that he was someone’s father from the very beginning.

No.
If you want to go from the very beginning, in the original outline Vader isn’t even part of the story. In the next writing (first script), he’s just a military officer.

  • “He slaps DARTH VADER, a tall, grim-looking general, on the back…”

He’s not the Central tragic figure, Chosen One, destroyer of worlds Lucas morphed him into decades later. He isn’t related to any of the characters. He isn’t Annikin. In fact, the separate character of Annikin is considerably younger than Luke.

  • “ANNIKIN STARKILLER, a tall, heavy-set boy of eighteen.”

Vader wasn’t Luke’s father in Brackett’s script for The Empire Strikes Back either. That change came along later when Lucas rewrote her work.

Leia being Luke’s sister would be another such item that Lucas would not tell anyone the real story until it was time.

No.

  • “LUKE SKYWALKER, Commander of the Aquilaean Starforce. He is a large man, apparently in his early sixties…”
    PRINCESS LEIA, about fourteen years old…"

Their being related was a late change while writing Return Of The Jedi as a way to tie up the “There is another” line from The Empire Strikes Back. When Lucas decided to scrap films 7, 8, 9 (or was that 10, 11, 12?), he had to scramble to come up with “another”.

Also, the saber duel on the lava planet was planned from the beginning. I knew about it very early on.

No.
For the film Star Wars, the original outline and the first four scripts have no mention what so ever of a lava duel. That wouldn’t come along until an early draft of Return Of The Jedi and even then it was Luke fighting Vader. The lava had nothing to do with Vader needing a suit.

I occasionally peruse a Saga forum to get a feel for the climate when a new trailer or bit of news is released. I understand there are lots of fans who want the saga to be a clean, contained, planned-from-day-one story. I understand they are under the impression that Lucas * genuflect * was some sort of profound creator of their world.

Unfortunately (for them) there are decades of evidence proving that just isn’t the case.
If you dig The Tragedy Of Darth Vader saga, cool, but don’t kid yourself that it was all planned from the very beginning as some sort of Original Vision ™. It wasn’t.

The problem with evidence is that it is only as good as the truth at the time. Lucas wanted the identity of Luke’s real father kept a secret. I am not surprised Leigh Brackett didn’t include it becuase it was probably something Lucas intended to drop in a later draft (which is what happened) and no draft of the script had the right lines until the script was published. That line was omitted from all circulated scripts during the entirety of production. I think only Lucas, Kasdan, Hammil, James Earl Jones and Ben Burt knew what the line was before the movie premiered so I don’t think that not seeing the line in early drafts of the script is any indication of when that particular piece of the story was added to what Lucas intended.

And since he played it so close to his chest during Empire’s production, there is nothing to say that Luke and Leia being siblings was not similarly hidden and she was the other all along. His comments since indicate that he was planning the family drama from the beginning and the earliest drafts of the script bear this out. He had fathers, sons, twins, from the beginning, but they vanish once he started seriously developing the installment we know as just Star Wars. Luke just has a dead father and an aunt and uncle. Lucas has repeatedly said what his intentions were and I think his secrecy (of which there is plenty of evidence) kept it out of the drafts of the script and kept there from being any evidence of his intentions. Such secrets were very closely guarded during production and were deliberately left out of the scripts.

And not everything is clean. Yoda originally didn’t exist. Leia’s memories and the story of her birth don’t really mesh up (unless she was really strong with the force at birth - possible but…). So there is plenty that is not clean, but I think Lucas has been very clear since Jedi came out that the story we got (at least as far as the Skywalker family goes) is the story he intended. I just pulled out the novel of A New Hope and just the opening section and the section in Ben’s hut - much about the Repubic, the Jedi, Palpatine (the public face, not the Sith Lord), and Ben’s untruth to Luke (Ben tells Luke a comfortable lie) are right there on the page. The volcano duel came from Lucas himself in multiple interviews back to late summer 1977. He even once hinted that one version of the story might have Vader be Luke’s father. A rare slip for him, but a nice tidbit the indicates that was his thinking all along.

Sources?